Browse > Article

Exploration of the Direction for the Practice of Process-Focused Assessment  

Lee, Kyeong-Hwa (Seoul National University)
Kang, Hyun Young (Mokwon University)
Ko, Eun-Sung (Jeonju National University of Education)
Lee, Dong-Hwan (Busan National University of Education)
Shin, Bomi (Chonnam National University)
Lee, Hwan Chul (Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity)
Kim, Sun Hee (Kangwon National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics / v.26, no.4, 2016 , pp. 819-834 More about this Journal
Abstract
As a method to lead a change in mathematics education, recently reformation of assessment appears as a concept of process-focused assessment. Process-focused assessment is the concept that 2015 revised mathematics curriculum aims for, which is promoted also in policy. This research suggested a significance of process-focused assessment that has not been determined in conceptualization and the practical model. For this, this research investigated the content of the assessment on 2015 revised mathematics curriculum, and explored process-focused assessment based on the recent education assessment theory and research. Also, we suggested a model of practical plan by investigating the condition to perform the process-focused assessment. This research could take a basic role to practice process-focused assessment and investigate the concrete plan in the mathematics class field.
Keywords
process-focused assessment; 2015 revised mathematics curriculum; formative assessment;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Wiliam, D., & Leahy, S. (2007). A theoretical foundation for formative assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Eds.), Formative classroom assessment: Theory into practice (pp. 99-118). New York: Teachers College Press.
2 박경미 외(2015). 2015 개정 수학과 교육과정 시안 개발 연구 II. 한국과학창의재단.
3 강시중(1995). 교육개론. 서울: 교육출판사.
4 강옥기(2010). 수학과 학습지도와 평가론. 경문사.
5 교육과학기술부(2011). 수학과 교육과정.
6 교육부(2015a). 제2차 수학교육 종합 계획.
7 교육부(2015b). 수학과 교육과정.
8 교육부(2016). 학교생활기록 작성 및 관리지침 일부개정안. (2016. 4. 5.발표).
9 김송자(1991). 초등학교 수학과 수행평가 실천에 관한 연구- 자기평가.관찰평가 중심으로. 대구교육대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
10 김종서(1991). 교육연구의 방법. 배영사.
11 노철현(2009). 수행평가의 타당성: 인식론적 재검토. 교육철학회. 교육철학, 46, 67-89.
12 박경미 외(2015). 2015 개정 수학과 교육과정 시안 개발 연구 II. 한국과학창의재단.
13 박정(2013) 형성 평가의 재등장과 교육 평가적 시사. 교육평가연구, 26(4), 719-738.
14 손정화, 강옥기(2012). 수학교육의 교수.학습 참평가 모형 및 예시 도구 개발; 프로젝트법을 중심으로, 학교수학, 14(1), 109-134.
15 백순근(2000). 수행평가의 원리. 서울: 교육과학사.
16 백순근(2002). 수행평가: 이론적 측면. 서울: 교육과학사.
17 성태제, 임현정 (2014) 형성 평가의 재인식에 따른 교사와 학교교육의 변화를 위한 제언. 교육평가연구, 27(3), 597-615.
18 손정화, 강옥기(2013). 학교수학에서의 참평가 모형 개발에 대한 연구, 학교수학, 15(1), 77-99.
19 이봉주, 변희현, 류현아, 양명희, 최길찬, 민시은(2010). CRESST 형성 평가 프로그램 적용을 통한 효과적인 교육방안 연구. 한국교육과정평가원. RRI2010-7.
20 이종연(2002). 고등학교 수학의 정의적 영역에 대한 수행평가 기준개발. 학교수학, 4(2), 193-204.
21 정상권, 이경화, 유연주, 신보미, 김구연(2012). 과정 중심의 수학 교과 평가방안 연구. 한국과학창의재단 장학연구 2012-1.
22 Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: a cognitive view. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston..
23 최승현(1998). 대안적인 평가를 통한 수학교육. 대한수학교육학회 논문집, 8(1). 217-235.
24 한국과학창의재단(2016). 2016 수학교육 정책사업 공고. 한국과학창의재단 공고 제2016-008호
25 황혜정(2003). 수학과 수행평가에 관한 이해의 혼돈: 최근 국내 논문 분석을 중심으로. 수학교육. 42(2). 159-176.
26 Black, H. (1986). Assessment for learning. In D.L. Nuttall (ed.), Assessing educational achievement (pp.7-18). London: Falrmer Press.
27 Black, P. J., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5-31.   DOI
28 Brookhart, S. M. (2003). Developing measurement theory for classroom assessment purposes and uses. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(4), 1-5.
29 Daugherty, R., Black, P., Ecclestone, K., James, M., & Newton, P.(2012). Alternative perspectives on learning outcomes: Challenges for assessment. In J. Gardner(ed.), Assessment and learning (pp.72-86). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
30 Clarke, B. (2008). A framework of growth points as a powerful teacher development tool. In D. Tirosh & T. Wood (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics teacher education: Vol. 2. Tools and processes in mathematics teacher education (pp. 235-256). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
31 Doerr, H. M. (2006). Examining the tasks of teaching when using students' mathematical thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62, 3-24.   DOI
32 Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children's mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169-202.
33 Graue, M. E. (1993). Integrating theory and practice through instructional assessment. Educational Assessment, 1, 293-309.
34 Harlen, W. (2012). On the relationship between assessment for formative and summative purposes. In J. Gardner(ed.), Assessment and learning (pp.87-102). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
35 Harlen, W., & James, M.(1997). Assessment and learning: Differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 4(3), 365-380.   DOI
36 LeMahieu, P. G., & Reilly, E. C. (2004). Systems of coherence and resonance: Assessment for education and assessment of education. In M. Wilson (Eds.), Toward coherence between classroom assessment and accountability: 104th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
37 McMillan, H. J. (2011). Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effective standardsbased instruction. Boston: Pearson.
38 Peressini, D., & Webb, N. (1999). Analyzing mathematical reasoning in students' responses across multiple performance tasks. In Lee V. Steff (ed.), Developing Mathematical Reasoning in Grade K-12, NCTM yearbook (pp.156-174). NCTM, Reston. Verginia,
39 Moskal, B. M., & Magone, M. E. (2000). Making sense of what students know: Examining the referents, relationships and modes students displayed in response to a decimal task. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43(4), 313-335.   DOI
40 NCTM(1989). 수학교육과정과 평가의 새로운 방향(구광조, 오병승, 류희찬 역). 서울: 경문사.
41 Ryan, J., & Williams, J. (2000). Mathematical discussions with children. University of Manchester.
42 Shepard, L. A. (2000). The Role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14.
43 Sowder, J. T. (2007). The mathematics education and development of teachers. In F. K. Lester Jr (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 157-223). Charlotte, NC: Informational Age.
44 Stiggins, R. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment FOR learning: A path to success in standards-based schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(4), 324-328.   DOI
45 Swaffield, S. (2011). Getting to the heart of authentic assessment for Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(4), 433-449.   DOI
46 Swan, M., & Burkhardt, H. (2014). Lesson Design for Formative Assessment. Educational Designer, 2(7).
47 Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen. (1994). Improvement of (didactical) assessment by improvement of problems: An attempt with respect to percentage, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27(4), 341-372.   DOI
48 Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington. IN: Soluton Tree Press.