Browse > Article

Eye Movements in Understanding Combinatorial Problems  

Choi, In Yong (Hansung Science High School)
Cho, Han Hyuk (Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics / v.26, no.4, 2016 , pp. 635-662 More about this Journal
Abstract
Combinatorics, the basis of probabilistic thinking, is an important area of mathematics and closely linked with other subjects such as informatics and STEAM areas. But combinatorics is one of the most difficult units in school mathematics for leaning and teaching. This study, using the designed combinatorial models and executable expression, aims to analyzes the eye movement of graduate students when they translate the written combinatorial problems to the corresponding executable expression, and examines not only the understanding process of the written combinatorial sentences but also the degree of difficulties depending on the combinatorial semantic structures. The result of the study shows that there are two types of solving process the participants take when they solve the problems : one is to choose the right executable expression by comparing the sentence and the executable expression frequently. The other approach is to find the corresponding executable expression after they derive the suitable mental model by translating the combinatorial sentence. We found the cognitive processing patterns of the participants how they pay attention to words and numbers related to the essential informations hidden in the sentence. Also we found that the student's eyes rest upon the essential combinatorial sentences and executable expressions longer and they perform the complicated cognitive handling process such as comparing the written sentence with executable expressions when they try the problems whose meaning structure is rarely used in the school mathematics. The data of eye movement provide meaningful information for analyzing the cognitive process related to the solving process of the participants.
Keywords
combinatorics; word problem; executable expression; eye-tracking;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 김선희 (2004). 수학 문장제 해결에 영향을 주는 언어적.인지적 요인 - 혼합물 문제를 중심으로 -. 수학교육학연구 14(3), 267-281.
2 우정호 외 (2016). 고등학교 확률과 통계. 서울:동아출판.
3 이미진, 이광호 (2015). 시선 추적기를 통해 본, 4학년 학생들의 방정식에 대한 관계적 사고형성. 학교수학 17(3), 391-405.
4 이주영, 김서령, 박혜숙, 김완순 (2006). 조합문제 사이의 구조적 동형. 수학교육 45(1), 123-138.
5 이지윤 (2015). 3D 입체 변별 과제에서 공간 인지 전략의 유형과 역할 : 체화된 3D 거북 표현식과 전략을 중심으로. 박사학위논문, 서울대학교, 서울.
6 이지현, 이정연, 최영기 (2005). 순열 조합 문장제의 문제 변인과 오류 분석. 학교수학 7(2), 123-137.
7 조한혁 (2003). 컴퓨터와 수학교육. 수학교육 42(2), 177-191.
8 조한혁, 송민호 (2014). 실행식 (Executable expression) 기반 SMART 스토리텔링 수학교육. 수학교육학연구 24(2), 269-283.
9 Andra, C., Lindstrom, P., Arzarello, F., Holmqvist, K., Robutti, O., & Sabena, C. (2015). Reading mathematics representations: An eye-tracking study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 237-259.   DOI
10 Batanero, C., Navarro-Pelayo, V., & Godino, J. D. (1997). Effect of the implicit combinatorial model on combinatorial reasoning in secondary school pupils. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 32(2), 181-199.   DOI
11 Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., Christensen, R. H. B., Singmann, H., ... & Rcpp, L. (2015). Package 'lme4'. convergence, 12, 1.
12 Campbell, S. R. (2010). Embodied minds and dancing brains: New opportunities for research in mathematics education. In Theories of mathematics education (pp. 309-331). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
13 DeAngelus, M., & Pelz, J. B. (2009). Top-down control of eye movements: Yarbus revisited. Visual Cognition, 17(6-7), 790-811.   DOI
14 Clifton, C., Staub, A., & Rayner, K. (2007). Eye movements in reading words and sentences. Eye movements: A window on mind and brain, 341-372.
15 Cummins, D. D., Kintsch, W., Reusser, K., & Weimer, R. (1988). The role of understanding in solving word problems. Cognitive psychology, 20(4), 405-438.   DOI
16 Dambacher, M., & Kliegl, R. (2007). Synchronizing timelines: Relations between fixation durations and N400 amplitudes during sentence reading. Brain research, 1155, 147-162.   DOI
17 De Smedt, B., & Verschaffel, L. (2010). Traveling down the road: from cognitive neuroscience to mathematics education… and back. ZDM, 42(6), 649-654.   DOI
18 Dubois, J. G. (1984). A Systematic Study of Simple Combinatorial Configurations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15(1), 37-57.   DOI
19 Eizenberg, M. M., & Zaslavsky, O. (2004). Students' verification strategies for combinatorial problems. Mathematical Thinking and learning, 6(1), 15-36.   DOI
20 English, L. D. (1991). Young children's combinatoric strategies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(5), 451-474.   DOI
21 English, L. D. (1993). Children's strategies for solving two-and three-dimensional combinatorial problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 255-273.
22 Grant, E. R., & Spivey, M. J. (2003). Eye movements and problem solving guiding attention guides thought. Psychological Science, 14(5), 462-466.   DOI
23 English, L. D., & Halford, G. S. (1995). Mathematics education. 고상숙, 고호경, 박만구, 이중권, 정인철, 황우형 역. 서울: 경문사.
24 Epelboim, J., & Suppes, P. (2001). A model of eye movements and visual working memory during problem solving in geometry. Vision Research, 41(12), 1561-1574.   DOI
25 Fischbein, E., & Gazit, A. (1988). The combinatorial solving capacity in children and adolescents. Zentralblatt fur Didaktik der Mathematik, 5, 193-198.
26 Gegenfurtner, A., Lehtinen, E., & Saljo, R. (2011). Expertise differences in the comprehension of visualizations: A meta-analysis of eye-tracking research in professional domains. Educational Psychology Review, 23(4), 523-552.   DOI
27 Goldberg, J. H., & Kotval, X. P. (1999). Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: methods and constructs. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 24(6), 631-645.   DOI
28 Hegarty, M., Mayer, R. E., & Green, C. E. (1992). Comprehension of arithmetic word problems: Evidence from students' eye fixations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 76.   DOI
29 Hegarty, M., Mayer, R. E., & Monk, C. A. (1995). Comprehension of arithmetic word problems: A comparison of successful and unsuccessful problem solvers. Journal of educational psychology, 87(1), 18.   DOI
30 Holmqvist, K., Nystrom, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., & Van de Weijer, J. (2011). Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. OUP Oxford.
31 Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological review, 87(4), 329.   DOI
32 Kapur, J. N. (1970). Combinatorial analysis and school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 3(1), 111-127.   DOI
33 Lewis, A. B. (1989). Training students to represent arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 521.   DOI
34 Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., & Raney, G. E. (2001). An eye movement study of insight problem solving. Memory & cognition, 29(7), 1000-1009.   DOI
35 Kingsdorf, S., & Krawec, J. (2014). Error analysis of mathematical word problem solving across students with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29(2), 66-74.   DOI
36 Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. 김지홍, 문선모 역. 경기도: 나남.
37 Lin, J. J. H., & Lin, S. S. (2014). Cognitive Load for Configuration Comprehension in Computer-Supported Geometry Problem Solving: AN Eye Movement Perspective. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12, 605-627.   DOI
38 Mayer, R. E. (1992). Thinking, problem solving, cognition. WH Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co.
39 Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books, Inc..
40 Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it; a new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton university press.
41 Radford, L. (2010). The eye as a theoretician: Seeing structures in generalizing activities. For the Learning of Mathematics, 30(2), 2-7.
42 Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological bulletin, 124(3), 372.   DOI
43 Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
44 R Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Viena, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/.
45 Roa, R. (2000). Razonamiento combinatorio en estudiantes con preparacion matematica avanzada. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
46 Snowden, R., Thompson, P., & Troscianko, T. (2012). Basic vision: an introduction to visual perception. 오성주 역. 서울: 학지사.
47 Susac, A., Bubic, A., Kaponja, J., Planinic, M., & Palmovic, M. (2014). Eye Movements Reveal Students' Strategies in Simple Equation Solving. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12, 555-577.   DOI
48 Thomas, L. E., & Lleras, A. (2007). Moving eyes and moving thought: On the spatial compatibility between eye movements and cognition. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 14(4), 663-668.   DOI
49 Yarbus, A. L. (1967). Eye movements during perception of complex objects (pp. 171-211). Springer US.