Browse > Article

Understanding a Prospective Teacher's Mathematics Lesson in the Perspective of Activity Theory  

Na, Gwisoo (Cheongju National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics / v.26, no.3, 2016 , pp. 355-370 More about this Journal
Abstract
This research intends to and understand a prospective teacher, Kim's mathematics lesson in the perspective of Activity Theory. In this study, Kim's mathematics lesson was explored in the aspects of subject, object, tools, division of labor, community, and rule which are main constituent of Activity Theory and Activity System suggested by $Engestr{\ddot{o}}m$. As the result of study, we discussed the phenomena such as the fluctuation between object and tool, the multi-voicedness between object, rule, outcome and student subject, and the dissonance between division of labor, community and rule were appeared in Kim's mathematics lesson as an activity system.
Keywords
prospective teacher; mathematics lesson; Activity theory; Activity system;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 강완(1991). 수학적 지식의 교수학적 변환. 수학교육, 30(3), 71-89. 한국수학교육학회.
2 권성룡(2015). 초등예비교사의 수학수업에서의 학습과제의 인지적 수준 분석. 초등수학교육, 18(2), 61-75.
3 교육과학기술부(2009). 2009 개정 수학과 교육과정. 교육과학기술부.
4 교육부(2015). 2015 개정 수학과 교육과정. 교육부.
5 나귀수(2008). 초등학교 예비교사들의 수학 수업 관점에 대한 연구: 예비교사들의 수업 논평 비교를 중심으로. 학교수학, 10(2), 279-296.
6 남승인 외(2004). 초등 교사 교육을 위한 수학프로그램 적용 및 확산 연구. 교육인적자원부.
7 방정숙(2011). 예비 교사의 초등 수학 수업 분석과 인식. 한국초등수학교육학회지, 15(2), 221-246.
8 이경화(1996). 교수학적 변환론의 이해. 대한수학교육학회 논문집, 6(1), 203-213.
9 이용숙(1999). 교육연구에서의 질적 자료의 분석. 이용숙.김영천(1999), 교육에서의 질적 연구 -방법과 적용-(107-186), 교육과학사.
10 한국과학창의재단(2016). 2016 수학교육 정책사업 공고-수학 수업용 교구 표준안 개발 연구. https://www.kofac.re.kr/?page_id=1673&pageid=2&uid=7387&mod=document.
11 Cobb, P., Perlwitz, M. & Underwood, D. (1996). Constructivism and activity theory: A consideration of their similarities and differences as they relate to mathematics education. In H. Mansfield et al. (eds.), Mathematics for Tomorrow's Young Children, 10-58, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
12 Chevallard, Y. (1980). The Didactics of Mathematics: Its Problematic and Related Research. Researches en Didactique des Mathematiques, 1, 146-157.
13 David, M. M. & Tomaz, V. S. (2012). The role of visual representations for structuring classroom mathematical activity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80, 413-431.   DOI
14 Mwanza, D. & Engestrom, Y. (2003). Pedagogical adeptness in the design of e-learning environments: Experiences from Lab@Future project. Proceedings of E-Learn 2003 International Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, & Higher Education. Phoenix, AR.
15 Engestrom, Y. (1987). Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
16 Engestrom, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-156.   DOI
17 Jaworski, B. & Potari, D. (2009). Bridging the macroand micro-divide: using an activity theory model to capture sociocultural complexity in mathematics teaching and its development. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72, 219-236.   DOI
18 Leont'ev, A. N. (1978) Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
19 Merriam, S. B. (1998) Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in education. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 강윤수 외 8인 역(2005), 정성연구 방법론과 사례 연구, 교우사.
20 NCTM(2000). Principle and standards for school mathematics. Reston. VA: The National Council of Teacher of Mathematics. 류희찬, 조완영, 이경화, 나귀수, 김남균, 방정숙 공역(2007), 학교수학을 위한 원리와 규준, 경문사.
21 Nunez, I. (2009). Activity theory in mathematics education. In Joubert, M. (ed.), Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Mathematics, 29(2), 53-57.
22 Reys, R. E., Lindquist, M. M., Lambdin, D. V. & Smith, N. L. (2007). Helping Children Learn Mathematics. NY, New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc. 강문봉 외 역(2003), 초등수학 학습지도의 이해, 양서원.
23 Skemp, R. R. (1989). Mathematics in the primary school. London: Routledge.
24 Engestrom, Y. & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5, 1-24.   DOI
25 Spradley, J. (1980). Participant Observation. N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 이희봉 역(1988), 참여 관찰 방법, 대한교과서주식회사.
26 Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in Society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.