1 |
김연식.정영옥(1997). Freudenthal의 수학화 학습 -지도론 연구. 수학교육학연구, 7(2), 1-23.
|
2 |
김진호(2003). 학교수준에서의 수학적 창의성에 대한 논의. 교육과학연구, 34(2), 149-165.
|
3 |
김진호(2004). 수학적 창의성에 대한 일 논의-창의적인 사람, 창의적인 산물, 창의적인 과정이란 관점으로부터. 수학교육논문집, 18(3), 45-56.
|
4 |
성창근.박성선(2012). 수학적 창의성 계발을 위 한 과제와 수업 방향 탐색. 한국초등수학교육학회지, 16(2), 253-267.
|
5 |
우정호(2000). 수학 학습-지도 원리와 방법. 서울: 서울대학교 출판부.
|
6 |
이경화(2015). 수학적 창의성. 서울: 경문사.
|
7 |
정영옥(1997). Freudenthal의 수학화 학습-지도론 연구. 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문.
|
8 |
정영옥(1999). 현실적 수학교육에 대한 고찰. 수학교육학연구, 9(1), 81-109.
|
9 |
정영옥(2005). 교과과정 개발을 위한 기초로서의 개발연구에 대한 고찰. 수학교육학연구, 15(3), 353-374.
|
10 |
한정민.박만구(2010). 수학적 창의성 관점에서 본 교사의 발문 분석. 한국초등수학교육학회지, 14(3), 865-884.
|
11 |
황우형.최계현.김경미.이명희(2006). 수학교육과 수학적 창의성. 수학교육논문집, 20(4), 561-574.
|
12 |
Bobis, J., & Bobis, E. (2005). The empty number line: Making children's thinking visible. In Coupland, M., Anderson, J., & Spencer, T. (Eds.). Proceedings of the twentieth biennial conference of the Australian association of mathematics teachers, 66-72.
|
13 |
Bobis, J. (2007). The Empty Number Line: A Useful Tool or Just Another Procedure?. Teaching Children Mathematics, 13(8), 410-413.
|
14 |
Brendel, E. (2004). Intuition pumps and the proper use of thought experiments. Dialectica, 58(1), 89-108.
|
15 |
Freudenthal, H. (1968). Why to teach mathematics so as to be useful. Educational studies in mathematics, 1(1), 3-8.
DOI
|
16 |
교육부(2015). 2015 개정 수학과 교육과정. 교육부 고시 제2015-74호 [별책8].
|
17 |
김도한.황혜정.김창일.정영옥.박만구. 고호경.김선희.한혜숙.한세호.김현아.장미라.정은선(2010). 창의 중심의 수학 수업 내실화 및 평가 방안 연구. 서울: 한국과학창의재단.
|
18 |
Freudenthal, H. (1973). Mathematics as an educational task. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
|
19 |
Freudenthal, H. (1981). Major problems of mathematics education. Educational studies in mathematics, 12(2), 133-150.
DOI
|
20 |
Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting Mathematics Education: China Lectures. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
|
21 |
Hanna, R. (2002). Mathematics for humans: Kant's philosophy of arithmetic revisited. European Journal of Philosophy, 10(3), 328-352.
DOI
|
22 |
Gravemeijer, K. (1993a). Modelling two-digit addition and subtraction with an empty number line. Teaching and learning mathematics in contexts, 51-61.
|
23 |
Gravemeijer, K. (1993b). The empty number line as an alternative means of representation for addition and subtraction. Innovation in mathematics education by modelling and applications, 141-159.
|
24 |
Gravemeijer, K. (1999). How emergent models may foster the constitution of formal mathematics. Mathematical thinking and learning, 1(2), 155-177.
DOI
|
25 |
Klein, A. S., Beishuizen, M., & Treffers, A. (1998). The empty number line in Dutch second grades: Realistic versus gradual program design. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 443-464.
|
26 |
Klein, A. S., Beishuizen, M., & Treffers, A. (2002). The empty number line in Dutch second grade. Lessons learned from research, 41-44.
|
27 |
Otte, M. F., Campos, T. M., & Abido, A. S. (2013). Plato, Pascal, and the dynamics of personal knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(3), 397-415.
DOI
|
28 |
Prediger, S., Gravemeijer, K., & Confrey, J. (2015). Design research with a focus on learning processes: an overview on achievements and challenges. ZDM, 47(6), 877-891.
DOI
|
29 |
Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2000). Mathematics education in the Netherlands: A guided tour. Freudenthal Institute CD-rom for ICME9, 1-32.
|
30 |
Van Den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2003). The didactical use of models in realistic mathematics education: An example from a longitudinal trajectory on percentage. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54(1), 9-35.
DOI
|
31 |
Van Oers, B. (2002). The mathematization of young children's language. In Symbolizing, modeling and tool use in mathematics education (pp. 29-58). Springer Netherlands.
|
32 |
Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2008). Learning from "didactikids": An impetus for revisiting the empty number line. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(3), 6-31.
DOI
|
33 |
Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Drijvers, P. (2014). Realistic mathematics education. In Lerman, S. (Ed.). Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 521-525). Springer Netherlands.
|