Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2020.34.3.215

An Analysis Prospective Mathematics Teachers' Perception on the Use of Artificial Intelligence(AI) in Mathematics Education  

Shin, Dongjo (College of Education, Korea University)
Publication Information
Communications of Mathematical Education / v.34, no.3, 2020 , pp. 215-234 More about this Journal
Abstract
With the advent of the AI, the need to use AI in the field of education is widely recognized. The purpose of this study is to shed light on how prospective mathematics teachers perceive the need for AI and the role of teachers in future mathematics education. As a result, with regard to teaching, prospective teachers recognized that the use of AI in school mathematics is a demand of a new era, that various types of lesson can be implemented, and that accurate knowledge and information can be delivered. On the other hand, they recognized that AI has limitations in having cognitive and emotional interactions with students. As for mathematics learning, the prospective teachers recognized that AI can provide individualized learning, be used for supplementary learning outside of school, and stimulate students' interest in learning. However, they also said that learning through AI could undermine students' ability to think on their own. With regard to assessment, the prospective teachers recognized that AI is objective, fair and can reduce teachers' workload, but they also said that AI has limitations in evaluating students' abilities in constructed-response items and in process-focused assessment. The roles of teachers that the prospective teachers think were to conduct a lesson, emotional interaction, unstructured assessment, and counseling, and those of AI were individualized learning, rote learning, structured assessment, and administrative works.
Keywords
mathematics education; artificial intelligence; prospective mathematics teachers; teacher role;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Kim, H-K., Park, C., Jeong, S., & Ko, H. K. (2018). A view on complementary relation of human teacher and AI teacher in future education, Journal of Education & Culture, 24(6), 189-207.
2 Nam M. (2018). The characteristics of teacher perceptions on the school education changes in intelligent information society. The Journal of Educational Development, 38(2), 129-153.
3 Park, S., & Ihm, H-J. (2019). Elementary English teachers' perception toward future of English education. The Journal of Education, 39(4), 123-144.
4 Park, J. H., & Shin, N. M. (2017). Students' perceptions of artificial intelligence technology and artificial intelligence teachers. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 34(2), 169-192.   DOI
5 Suk, J-Y., & Yi, S-W. (2018). The role of teachers in the age of artificial intelligence- A case of the tasks for Korean teachers. Humanities Research, 55, 361-390.
6 Song, S. C., & Shim, K. C. (2017). A study on the awareness of pre-service science teachers about secondary education in future intelligence information society. Biology Education, 45(3), 404-417.   DOI
7 Ryu, K., Jung, J. W., Kim, Y. S., & Kim, H. B. (2018). Understanding qualitative research methods. Seoul; Park Young Sa.
8 Lim, J. H., Ryu, K. H., & Kim, B. C. (2017). An exploratory study on the direction of education and teacher competencies in the 4th industrial revolution. The Journal of Korean Education, 44(2), 5-32.
9 Aksoy, E., Narli, S., & Idil, F. H. (2016). Using data mining techniques examination of the middle school students' attitude towards mathematics in the context of some variables. International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology, 4(3), 210-228.   DOI
10 Choi, M-Y. & Lee, T-W. (2019). The status of Artificial Intelligence in education and Prediction of change in roles of teacher and school. Conference Paper of the Korean Association of Computer Education, 23(2), 85-88.
11 Ally, M. (2019). Competency profile of the digital and online teacher in future education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(2), 302-318.   DOI
12 Chassignol, M., Khoroshavin, A., Klimova, A., & Bilyatdinova, A. (2018). Artificial intelligence trends in education: a narrative overview. Procedia Computer Science, 136, 16-24.   DOI
13 Araya, R., Jimenez, A., Bahamondez, M., Calfucura, P., Dartnell, P., & Soto-Andrade, J. (2014). Teaching modeling skills using a massively multiplayer online mathematics game. World Wide Web, 17(2), 213-227.   DOI
14 Bywater, J. P., Chiu, J. L., Hong, J., & Sankaranarayanan, V. (2019). The teacher responding tool: Scaffolding the teacher practice of responding to student ideas in mathematics classrooms. Computers & Education, 139, 16-30.   DOI
15 Cabestrero, R., Quiros, P., Santos, O. C., Salmeron-Majadas, S., Uria-Rivas, R., Boticario, J. G., ... & Ferri, F. J. (2018). Some insights into the impact of affective information when delivering feedback to students. Behaviour & Information Technology, 37(12), 1252-1263.   DOI
16 Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254-280.   DOI
17 Cope, B., Kalantzis, M., & Searsmith, D. (2020). Artificial intelligence for education: Knowledge and its assessment in AI-enabled learning ecologies. Educational Philosophy and Theory. Advance online publication.
18 Cukurova, M., Kent, C., & Luckin, R. (2019). Artificial intelligence and multimodal data in the service of human decision‐making: A case study in debate tutoring. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3032-3046.   DOI
19 Dutton, T., Barron, B., & Boskovic, G. (2018). Building an ai world: Report on national and regional ai strategies. Retrieved from https://www.cifar.ca/docs/default-source/ai-society/buildinganaiworld_eng.pdf
20 Martin, T., Smith, C. P., Forsgren, N., Aghababyan, A., Janisiewicz, P., & Baker, S. (2015). Learning fractions by splitting: Using learning analytics to illuminate the development of mathematical understanding. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(4), 593-637.   DOI
21 Masci, C., Johnes, G., & Agasisti, T. (2018). Student and school performance across countries: A machine learning approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 269(3), 1072-1085.   DOI
22 McCarthy, J., Minsky, M. L., Rochester, N., & Shannon, C. E. (1955). A proposal for the Dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence. AI Magazine, 27(4), 12-14.
23 Pai, K. C., Kuo, B. C., Liao, C. H., & Liu, Y. M. (2020). An application of Chinese dialogue-based intelligent tutoring system in remedial instruction for mathematics learning. Educational Psychology. Advance online publication.
24 Phillips, A., Pane, J. F., Reumann-Moore, R., & Shenbanjo, O. (2020). Implementing an adaptive intelligent tutoring system as an instructional supplement. Educational Technology Research and Development. Advance online publication.
25 Huang, X., Craig, S. D., Xie, J., GraManyikeesser, A., & Hu, X. (2016). Intelligent tutoring systems work as a math gap reducer in 6th grade after-school program. Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 258-265.   DOI
26 Gabriel, F., Signolet, J., & Westwell, M. (2018). A machine learning approach to investigating the effects of mathematics dispositions on mathematical literacy. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 41(3), 306-327.   DOI
27 Guilherme, A. (2019). AI and education: the importance of teacher and student relations. AI & Society, 34(1), 47-54.   DOI
28 Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). 인공지능 시대의 미래교육 (정제영, 이선복 역). 서울: 박영스토리.
29 Reinhold, F., Hoch, S., Werner, B., Richter-Gebert, J., & Reiss, K. (2020). Learning fractions with and without educational technology: What matters for high-achieving and low-achieving students?. Learning and Instruction. Advance online publication.
30 Rajendran, R., Iyer, S., & Murthy, S. (2018). Personalized affective feedback to address students' frustration in ITS. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 12(1), 87-97.   DOI
31 Roll, I., & Wylie, R. (2016). Evolution and revolution in artificial intelligence in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 582-599.   DOI
32 Russell, S, J., & Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
33 Li, W., Chiu, C. K., & Tseng, J. C. (2019). Effects of a personalized navigation support approach on students' context-aware ubiquitous learning performances. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 22(2), 56-70.
34 Ibanez, M. B., Di-Serio, A., Villaran-Molina, D., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2015). Support for augmented reality simulation systems: The effects of scaffolding on learning outcomes and behavior patterns. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 9(1), 46-56.   DOI
35 Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children's mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169-202.   DOI
36 Kim, D., Yoon, M., Jo, I. H., & Branch, R. M. (2018). Learning analytics to support self-regulated learning in asynchronous online courses: A case study at a women's university in South Korea. Computers & Education, 127, 233-251.   DOI
37 Manyika, J., Chui, M., Miremadi, M., Bughin, J., George, K., Willmott, P., & Dewhurst, M. (2017). A future that works: Automation, employment, and productivity. New York: McKinsey Global Institute.
38 Shin, D., & Shim, J. (2020). A systematic review on data mining for mathematics and science education. International Journal of Science And Mathematics Education. Advance online publication.
39 Ryoo, K., & Linn, M. C. (2016). Designing automated guidance for concept diagrams in inquiry instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(7), 1003-1035.   DOI
40 Schwarz, B. B., Prusak, N., Swidan, O., Livny, A., Gal, K., & Segal, A. (2018). Orchestrating the emergence of conceptual learning: A case study in a geometry class. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(2), 189-211.   DOI
41 VanLehn, K., Burkhardt, H., Cheema, S., Kang, S., Pead, D., Schoenfeld, A., & Wetzel, J. (2019). Can an orchestration system increase collaborative, productive struggle in teaching-by-eliciting classrooms?. Interactive Learning Environments. Advance online publication.
42 Hu, W., & Shi, Y. B. (2018). Research on the role predicament of teachers in the era of artificial intelligence. US-China Education Review, 8(6), 273-278.
43 Wu, H. M., Kuo, B. C., & Wang, S. C. (2017). Computerized dynamic adaptive tests with immediately individualized feedback for primary school mathematics learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 61-72.
44 Zhao, Y., & Liu, G. (2019, January). How do teachers face educational changes in artificial intelligence era. 2018 International Workshop on Education Reform and Social Sciences (pp. 47-50). Chengdu, China.
45 Zhou, J-S., & Dai, J-C. (2019, June). The transformation of teachers' role in the new era of intelligence education. 2019 International Conference on Advanced Education and Management (pp. 297-301). Chengdu, China.
46 Kim, D.-J., Shin, J., Lee, J., Lim, W., Lee, Y., & Choi, S. (2019). Conceptualizing discursive teaching capacity: A case study of a middle school mathematics teacher, School Mathematics, 21(2), 291-318.   DOI
47 Ministry of Science & ICT (2019). National strategy for artificial intelligence. Retrieved from https://www.msit.go.kr/web/msipContents/contentsView.do?cateId=_policycom2&artId=2405727
48 Kyun, S., Yi, J., & Kwon, S. (2018). Students' perception of universities' introduction of artificial intelligence and of the artificial intelligence professors. The Journal of Educational Research, 16(3), 77-101.