Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2019.33.1.35

A Study on the Meaning of Reflection and Meta-Cognition in Mathematics Education  

Hwang, Hye Jeang (Chosun University)
Kim, Soo-Jin (The Graduate School, Chosun University)
Publication Information
Communications of Mathematical Education / v.33, no.1, 2019 , pp. 35-45 More about this Journal
Abstract
Reflection and Meta-Cognition became the centered interest as main subjects of the mathematics education studies together with problem solving education in the 1980s. And lots of researches who have concerned with them have been even progressed actively. But, the concept of the reflection and particularly meta-cognition has been pointed out continually because of its ambiguity and uncertainty. There is almost no researches intended to reveal the concept itself. Although the status of the reflection and/or meta-cognition in mathematics education. Therefore, it is significant at this point in time that the work of examining the concept of the reflection and meta-cognition be accomplished. By this reason, this study tried to examine and find out the essential nature of the concept of reflection and meta-cognition in aspects of mathematics education.
Keywords
Reflection; Meta-cognition;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Kim Soo-Mi (1992). A Study on Metacognition in Mathematics Education. Journal of the Korea society of educational studies in mathematics, 9(2), 95-104.
2 Kim Soo-Mi & Kim Yeon-Sik (1996). A Study on the Concept of Metacognition in Mathematics Education. Journal of the Korea society of educational studies in mathematics, 6(1), 111-123.
3 Kim Yeon-Sik & Chong Yeong Ok (1997). A Study on Freudenthal"s Mathematising Instruction Theory. Journal of the Korea society of educational studies in mathematics, 7(2), 1-23.
4 Paik Suk-Yoon (1995). The Search for a Way to Teach Metacognitive Thinking Skills Useful for Problem Solving. Journal of the Korea society of educational studies in mathematics, 5(2), 51-60.
5 Woo Jeung-Ho (2013). The Principle and Method for Teaching and Learning Mathematics. Seoul National University Publisher.
6 Yu Hyun Joo (1996). Problem solving and Meta-cognition. Journal of the Korea society of educational studies in mathematics, 6(1), 63-73.
7 Jeong Eun-sil (1993). Considerations on Polya's Mathematical Inquiry. Journal of the Korea society of educational studies in mathematics, 3(1), 59-74.
8 Hwang Hye Jeang, Na Geo Soo, Choi Seung Hyun, Park Kyoung Mi, Rhin Jae Hoon & Seo Dong Yeop (2016). The New Theory of Mathematics Education. Seoul: Moon Eum Sa.
9 Freudenthal, Hans (1991). Revisiting Mathematics Education. 우정호, 정은실, 박교식, 유현주, 정영옥, 이경화 역(2008), 프로이덴탈의 수학교육론. 서울: 경문사.
10 Lakatos, Imre (1976). Proofs and refutations : the logic of mathematical discovery. 우정호 역(2001). 수학적 발견의 논리. 서울: 민음사.
11 Lester, Jr. F. K. and Garofalo J. (1985). Metacognition, Cognitive Monitoring, and Mathematical Performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Educaton, 16, 163-176.   DOI
12 Polya, G. (1957), How to Solve it. 2nd ed., New York: Doubleday & Company, Inc..
13 Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). What's All the Fuss about Metaconition? In A. H. Schoenfeld(ed), Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education, 189-215. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14 Skemp, R. R. (1987). The Psychology of Learning Mathematics. 황우형 역(2000). 수학 학습 심리학. 서울: 사이언스북스.