Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2017.31.4.433

Analysis of Year 7 Mathematics Textbook for Function Area in Germany  

Gong, Seo Young (Hyowon High School)
Ko, Ho Kyoung (Department of Mathematics Graduate School of Education Ajou University)
Huh, Nan (Department of Mathematics Graduate School of Education Kyonggi University)
Publication Information
Communications of Mathematical Education / v.31, no.4, 2017 , pp. 433-456 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to suggest the directions for the development and improvement of mathematics textbooks in Korea by examining these characteristics of German textbooks. As a result, German mathematics textbooks were free for unit order and names of units. German mathematics textbooks defined a function for various real life and natural phenomena, relation after intuitively knowing the correspondence between two variables through a graph. In addition, it exercises interpreting the characteristics and information of the graph, guides the activity of graphing various functional situations, and contents to convert various expression methods such as graphs, tables, relational expressions, mathematical terms and sentences. In the German mathematics textbooks, mathematical expressions of the functional relations of the materials in various contexts of daily life, and the activities of predicting and predicting the future, were made to feel the usefulness of mathematics. It has raised functional thinking and provided problems related to other subjects, thus enhancing connectivity with other disciplines. It also included open issues and issues that required mathematical communication.
Keywords
German mathematics textbooks; introduction of function; real life problem; graph analysis; open-ended problem; mathematical communication;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 교육부(2015). 수학과 교육과정 (교육부 고시 제2015-74호 별책 8). 세종: 교육부 (The Ministry of Education (2015). Mathematics curriculum. Se Jong: The Ministry of Education.)
2 교육인적자원부(2008). 고등학교 수학과 교육과정 해설. (The Ministry of Education (2008). National Curriculum Guide of High School Mathematics.)
3 김다예(2014). 2009 개정 중 1 교과서 분석을 통한 함수의 그래프 지도의 문제점과 개선 방안, 한양대학교 교육대학원 석사학위 논문. (Kim, D. Y. (2014). An analysis of 2009 middle school mathematics texts in their presentation of graphs of functions. - The drawbacks and proposal of ways of improving. MA.Thesis. Graduate School of Education, HanYang University.)
4 김보경, 권성룡(2010). 개방형 문제를 활용한 수준별 학습이 학업성취도에 미치는 영향. 한국초등수학교육학회지. 14(3), 907-935. (Kim, B. K. & Kwon, S. (2010). An Influence of Using Open-ended Problems in Ability-Level Activities on Academic Achievement of Mathematics. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 14(3). 907-935.)
5 김해윤(2015). 수학과 핵심역량에 관한 연구-중학교 수학을 중심으로. 성균관대학교 박사학위 논문. (Kim, H. Y. (2015). A Study of Mathematics Key Competencies-Focused on Middle School Mathematics. Doctoral Dissertation, SungKyunKwan University.)
6 노정학, 양춘우, 정환옥(2003). 한국과 독일의 중등학교 수학교과서 비교 연구- 중학교 대수 영역을 중심으로-. 한국수학교육학회지, 42(3), 275-294. (Lau, J. H., Yang, C., & Jung, H. (2003). A Study on the Comparision of Middle School Mathematics Textbooks in Korea and Germany-Focused on the Area of Algebra-. The Mathematical Education, 42(3), 275-294.)
7 안은경(2010). 한국과 독일의 중학교 수학교과서 비교연구- 함수단원을 중심으로-. 성균관대학교 석사학위 논문. (Ahn, E. K. (2010). A ComparativeanalysisofMiddleSchoolMathematics Textbooks in Korea and Germany - focusedontheareaofFunction-. MA.Thesis.. Graduate School of Education, SungKyunKwan University.)
8 이정은(2011). 한국과 캐나다의 중학교 수학 교과서 비교 연구- 온주 9-10학년 함수를 중심으로-. 건국대학교 석사학위 논문. (Lee, J. E. (2011). A ComparativeanalysisofMiddleSchool Mathematics Textbooks in Korea and Canada. MA.Thesis.. Graduate School of Education, KonKuk University.)
9 정두리(2014). 이차함수에 대한 중학교 3학년 학생들의 오개념과 오개념 처치를 위한 교수방법 제안. 이화여자대학교 교육대학원 석사학위 논문. (Jung, D. (2014). Misconception about Quadratic Function and Proposal about Teaching Method for Treating the Misconception.. MA.Thesis.. Graduate School of Education, Ewha Womans University.)
10 한국교과서연구재단(2012). 유럽 주요국의 교과서 제도 비교 및 정책 동향 분석 연구. 73. (Korea Textbook Research Foundation (2012). A Comparative Study on School Textbook System between Europe. 73.
11 한국교육과정평가원(2012). 2012 교육과정.교육평가 국제동향 연구: 독일.러시아.영국.프랑스.핀란드. 42. (Korea Institute for Curriculum and Education (2012). ORM2012-115-4, 42.)
12 Stober, G. (2010). Schubuchzulassung in Deutschland:Grundlagen, Verfahrensweisenund Diskussionen, Eckert.Beritrage.
13 허난, 안은경, 고호경(2011). 한국과 독일의 중학교 수학 교과서 분석을 통한 함수 내용 비교. 대한수학교육학회지, 13(2), 323-343. (Huh, N., Aha, E. K., & Ko, H. K. (2011). Comparative Analysis of the Contents of Functions in the Middle School Mathematics Textbooks in Korea and Germany. School Mathematics, 13(2), 323-343)
14 Arno Lergenmüller et al.(2014). MATHEMATIK NEUE WEGE 7, Schroedel.
15 Berlin Senatsverwaltung fur Bildung, Jugend und Sport(2006). Rahmenlehrplan fur die Sekundarstufe I - Mathematik. http://www.berlin.de/imperia/md/content/sen-bildung/schulorganisation/lehrplaene/sek1_mathematik.pdf
16 Jutta Cukrowicz et al.(2007). MatheNetz 7, westermann.