Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2016.30.3.375

A communicational approach to mathematical process appeared in a peer mentoring teaching method  

Choi, Sang-Ho (Korea University Graduate School)
Ha, Jeong-Mi (Gwangreung Middle School)
Kim, Dong-Joong (Korea University)
Publication Information
Communications of Mathematical Education / v.30, no.3, 2016 , pp. 375-392 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to provide a philosophical reflection on mathematical process consistently emphasized in our curriculum and to stress the importance of sharing creativity and its applicability to the mathematical process with the value of sharing and participation. For this purpose, we describe five stages of changing process in a peer mentoring teaching method conducted by a teacher who taught this method for 17 years with the goal of sharing creativity and examine components of mathematical process and their impact on it in each stage based on learning environment, learning process, and assessment. Results suggest that six principles should be underlined and considered for students to be actively involved in mathematical process. After analyzing changes in the five stages of the peer mentoring teaching method, the five principles scrutinized in mathematical process are the principles of continuous interactivity, contextual dependence, bidirectional development, teacher capability, and student participation. On the basis of these five principles, the principle of cooperative creativity is extracted from effective changes of mathematical process as a guiding force.
Keywords
Changing stages in a peer mentoring teaching method; Sharing and participation; Mathematical process; Cooperative creativity;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 곽영순 (2014). 교사 그리고 질적연구, 경기도 파주: 교육과학사.(Kwak, Y. (2014). Teacher and qualitative research, Gyeonggido paju: kyoyookbook.)
2 김석우.최태진 (2007). 교육연구방법론, 서울: 학지사.(Kim, S., & Choi, T. (2007). Research Methodology in Education, Seoul: hakjisa.)
3 김은주.김민규.임은비 (2012). 유능성과 관계성이 내재동기에 미치는 영향, 교육학 연구, 50(1), 193-225.(Kim, E., Kim, M., & Lim, E. (2012). The effects of competence and relatedness on intrinsic motivation, Korean Journal of Education Research, 50(1), 193-225.)
4 김은주.도승이 (2009). 협동학습에서 학습자의 유능감 및 관계성 욕구와 내재동기 및 수업 참여의 관계분석, 교육심리연구, 23(1), 181-196.(Kim, E., & Do, S. (2009). The relationship among college students' competence, relatedness, intrinsic motivation, and engagement in cooperative learning, The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 23(1), 181-196.)
5 김종두 (2000). 교육과 의사소통, 서울: 양서원.(Kim, J. (2000). Education and communication, Seoul: yangseowon.)
6 김종렬 (2014). 내재적 동기, 학습전략, 수업참여 및 학업성취도의 구조적 관계, 아시아교육연구, 15(1), 93-113.(Kim, J. (2014). The structural relationship among intrinsic motivation, learning strategies, academic engagement, and academic achievement, Asian Journal of Education, 15(1), 93-113.)
7 김종렬.이은주 (2012). 초, 중학교급별 교실목표구조 기본심리욕구, 수업참여간의 구조적 관계 분석, 교육심리연구, 26(3), 817-835.(Kim, J., & Lee, E. (2012). The structural relationship among classroom goal structures, basic psychological needs, and academic engagement of elementary and middle school students, The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 26(3), 817-835.)
8 박승희 (2005). 아동의 학습동기 유형과 몰입과의 관계, 초등교육학연구, 12(2), 149-167.(Park, S. (2005). The relationship between children's learning motivation types and flow, The Journal of Elementary Education Studies, 12(2), 149-167.)
9 손영.김성일 (2005). 또래교수 집단구성 방식이 학업성취도와 교과흥미에 미치는 영향, 교육심리연구, 19(3), 595-613.(Sohn, Y., & Kim, S. (2005). The effect of grouping format of peer tutoring on achievement and interest, The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 19(3), 595-613.)
10 안미경 (2009). 동료멘토링을 통한 수학 학습부진아의 일차함수 학습에 대한 사례 연구, 이화여자대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.(Ahn, M. (2009). A case study on learning linear function of mathematical underachiever through the peer mentoring, Master's thesis, Ewha Womans University.)
11 전성연.최병연.이흔정.고영남.이영미 (2010). 협동학습 모형 탐색, 서울: 학지사.(Jeon, S., Choi, B., Lee, H., Ko, Y., & Lee, Y. (2010). Cooperative learning models, Seoul: hakjisa.)
12 조진우.이경화 (2015). 후기 비트겐슈타인 철학과 수학 학습, 수학교육학연구, 25(1), 59-74.(Cho, J., & Lee, K. (2015). The later wittgenstein' philosophy and mathematics learning, Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 25(1), 59-74.)
13 하정숙.박종호 (2010). 동료 멘토링이 초등학교 수학 학습장애아동의 사칙연산능력 및 학습태도에 미치는 영향, 한국초등교육, 21(2), 93-109.(Ha, J., & Park, J. (2010). The effect of peer mentoring on four rules of arithmetics ability and learning attitude of children with mathematics disabilities of elementary school, The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 21(2), 93-109.)
14 조현철 (2011). 내외적 학습동기, 자기결정성, 목표지향, 자기지각, 지능관 및 자기조절학습전략 요인들의 학습태도, 학습행동 및 학업성취에 대한 효과, 교육심리연구, 25(1), 33-60.(Cho, H. (2011). The effects of academic motivation, self-determination, goal orientation, self-perception, implicit theory of intelligence and self-regulated learning strategies on learning attitude, behavior and outcomes, The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 25(1), 33-60.)
15 차지혜.최상호.김동중 (2015). 또래교수법이 수학 문제해결과 수업 만족도에 미치는 영향, 한국학교수학회 논문집, 18(2), 203-221.(Cha, J., Choi, S., & Kim, D. (2015). Effects of a peer tutoring method on mathematical problem solving and class satisfaction, Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 18(2), 203-221.)
16 하정미 (2014). 두 가지 동료 멘토링 방법과 학습 참여의 특징, 고려대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문.(Ha, J. (2014). Two peer mentoring methods and characteristics of class participation, Korea University of the graduate school of education master's thesis.)
17 한영숙.현성용 (2010). 외적 보상, 내.외재동기, 과제유형이 문제 해결에 미치는 효과, 교육방법연구, 22(4), 21-42.(Han, Y., & Hyun, S. (2010). Effects of extrinsic reward, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation and types of task on problem solving, Educational Methodology Studies, 22(4), 21-42.)
18 홍진곤 (2012). 주체, 구조, 담론, 그리고 수학 학습, 수학교육학연구, 22(4), 459-475.(Hong, J. (2012). Subject, structure, discourse, and the learning of mathematics, Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 22(4), 459-475.)
19 휴먼스토리 (2011). 스티브 잡스의 세상을 바꾼 말 한마디, 서울: 미르북컴퍼니.(Humanstory(2011). Steve jobs' a word changing the world, Seoul: mirbook company.)
20 Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "What" and "Why" of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior, Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.   DOI
21 Dyer, J., Gregersen, H., & Christensen, C. (2009). The innovator's DNA, Watertown, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
22 Handelsman, M. M., Briggs, W. L., Sullivan, N., & Towler, A. (2005). A measure of college student course engagement, The Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 184-191.   DOI
23 Fantuzzo, J. W., King, J. A., & Heller, L. R. (1992). Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on mathematics and school adjustment: a component analysis, Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 331-339.   DOI
24 Gagne, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction(4th ed.), New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
25 Gallo, C. (2010). 스티브 잡스 무한 혁신의 비밀(박세연 옮김), 서울: 비즈니스북스.
26 Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Making cooperative learning work, Theory into Practice, 38(2), 67-73.   DOI
27 Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students' engagement by increasing teachers' autonomy support, Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 147-169.   DOI
28 Scruggs, T. E., & Osguthorpe, R. T. (1986). Tutoring interventions within special education settings: a comparison of cross-age and peer tutoring, Psychology in the Schools, 23, 187-193.   DOI
29 Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one, Educational Research, 27(2), 4-13.   DOI
30 Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating, New York: Cambridge University Press.
31 Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses, Distance education, 22(2), 306-331.   DOI
32 Wittgenstein, L. (1953/2003). Philosophical investigations: The German text, with a revised English translation (3rd ed., G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.), Malden, MA: Blackwell.
33 Vallerand, R. J., Fortier, M. S., & Guay, F. (1997). Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: toward a motivational model of high school dropout, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(5), 1161-1176.   DOI
34 Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language, Cambridge, M. A.: MIT Press.