1 |
Spradly, J. P. (1988). 참여관찰방법. (이희봉 역). 서울: 대한교과서주식회사, (원저 Participant observation은 1980년 New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston에서 출판).
|
2 |
Sternberg, R. J. (1977a). Component processes in analogical reasoning. Psychological Review, 84, 353-378.
DOI
|
3 |
Sternberg, R. J. (1977b). Intelligence, information processing, and analogical reasoning: The componential analysis of human abilities. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
|
4 |
VanLehn, K. A. (1983). Felicity conditions for human skill acquisition : validating an AI-based theory. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
|
5 |
Wharton, C. M., Holyoak, K. J., Downing, P. E., Lange, T. E., Wickens, T. D., & Melz, E. R. (1994). Below the surface: Analogical similarity and retrieval competition in reminding. Cognitive Psychology, 26(1), 64-101.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
김용태․신봉숙․최대욱․이순희 (2005). 유추를 통한 분수 연산에 관한 연구, 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 E <수학교육 논문집>, 19(4), 715-731.
과학기술학회마을
|
7 |
김진호 (2005). 수학자가 수학을 탐구하듯이 학습자도 수학을 탐구할 수 있는 방안 모색, 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 A <수학교육>, 44(1), 87-101.
과학기술학회마을
|
8 |
박미미․이동환․이경화․고은성 (2012). 유추에 의한 문제제기 활동을 통해 본 통계적 개념 이해, 대한수학교육학회지 수학교육학연구, 22(1), 101-115.
과학기술학회마을
|
9 |
박현정․이종희 (2006). 중학생들이 수학 문장제 해결 과정에서 구성하는 유사성 분석, 대한수학교육학회지 수학교육학연구, 16(2), 115-138.
과학기술학회마을
|
10 |
신은아 (2004). 귀납적 추론과 유추의 교과서 사례분석. 경북대학교 석사학위논문.
|
11 |
고상숙․김규상 (2003). 분수 학습에서 정신모델 구성을 위한 유추의 역할, 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 E <수학교육 논문집>, 15(1), 105-111.
과학기술학회마을
|
12 |
김연수 (1999). 기저유추원의 두 처리방식이 아동의 유추적 문제해결에 미치는 연령별 효과. 서울대학교 석사학위 논문.
|
13 |
양기열․이의진 (2011). 수학영재학생들의 유추를 통한 이차곡면의 탐구활동 분석, 영재교육연구, 21(2), 269-286.
과학기술학회마을
DOI
|
14 |
이경화 (2009). 영재아들의 세 유형의 유추 과제 해결, 대한수학교육학회지 수학교육학연구, 19(1), 45-61.
과학기술학회마을
|
15 |
이승우 (2001). 학교 수학에서의 유추와 은유. 서울대학교 석사학위 논문.
|
16 |
이종희․김선희 (2002). 인수분해 문제 해결과 유추, 대한수학교육학회지 <학교수학>, 4(4), 281-599.
과학기술학회마을
|
17 |
조성남․이현주․주영주․김나영 (2011). 질적연구방법과 실제. 서울: 그린.
|
18 |
조용환 (1999). 질적 연구: 방법과 사례. 서울: 교육과학사.
|
19 |
한인기․이상근 (2000). "유추"를 활용한 기하학습 자료 개발, 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 F <수학교육 학술지지>, 5, 165-174.
|
20 |
최남광․유희찬 (2009). 영재교육에서 유추를 통한 데카르트 정리의 도입가능성 고찰, 대한수학교육학회지 수학교육학연구, 19(4), 479-491.
과학기술학회마을
|
21 |
Alexander, P. A., White, C. S., & Daugherty, M. (1997). Children's use of analogical reasoning in early mathematics learning. In Lyn D. English(Ed.), Mathematical reasoning: Analogies, metaphors, and images(pp. 117-147). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
|
22 |
Bassok, M. (1990). Transfer of domain-specific problem-solving procedures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(3), 522-533.
DOI
|
23 |
Bassok, M., Wu, L. & Olseth, K. L. (1995). Judging a book by its cover: Interpretative effects of content on problem-solving transfer. Memory & Cognition, 23(3), 354-367.
DOI
|
24 |
Bourbaki, N. (1950). The architecture of mathematics. The American Mathematical Monthly, 57(4), 221-232.
DOI
|
25 |
Carpenter, P. A., Just M. A., & Shell, P. (1990). When one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the raven progressive matrices test. Psychological review, 97, 404-431.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
Chen, Z. (1995). Analogical transfer: From schematic pictures to problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 23(2), 255-269.
DOI
|
27 |
Chen, Z. (2002). Analogical problem solving: A hierarchical analysis of procedural similarity, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 81-98.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
28 |
Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1964). The early growth of logic in the child. New York: Norton.
|
29 |
Chen, Z., Yanowitz, K. L., & Daehler, M. W. (1995). Constraints on accessing abstract source information:Instantiation of principles facilitates children's analogical transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(3), 445-454.
DOI
|
30 |
Hunt, E. B. (1974). Quote the raven? Nevermore! In Lee W. Greg(Ed.), Knowledge and cognition(pp. 129-157). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
|
31 |
Keane, M. T., & Costello, F. (2001). Setting limits on analogy: Why conceptual combinations is not structural alignment. In Dedre Gentner, Keith J. Holyoak, & Boicho N. Kokinov(Eds), The analogical mind : perspectives from cognitive science(pp. 287-312). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
|
32 |
Ma, L. (2002). 초등학교 수학 이렇게 가르쳐라. (신현용, 승영조 역). 서울: 승산, (원저 Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teacher's understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States는 Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates에서 출판).
|
33 |
Markman, A. B. & Gentner, D. (1993). Structural alignment during similarity comparison. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 431-467.
|
34 |
Markman, A. B. & Gentner, D. (1997). The effects of alignment on memory. Psychological Science, 8, 363-367.
DOI
|
35 |
Medin, D., & Ortony, A. (1989). Psychological essentialism. In Stella Vosniadou & Andrew Ortony(Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning(pp.179-196). New York: Cambridge University Press.
|
36 |
Merriam, S. B. (2001). Qualitative research and case study applications in education(2nd ed.). San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publishers.
|
37 |
Miles M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods(2nd ed.). Sage Publications, CA: Thousand Oaks.
|
38 |
Reitman, W. R. (1965). Cognition and thought: An information-processing approach. New York: Wiley.
|
39 |
Novic, L. R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1991). Mathematical problem solving by analogy. Journal of experimental psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 398-415.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
40 |
Polya, G. (1954). Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning, Vol. I: Induction and analogy in mathematics. London: Oxford University Press.
|
41 |
Richland, L. E., Holyoak, K. J., & Stigler, J. W. (2004). Analogy use in eighth-grade mathematics classrooms. Cognition and instruction, 22, 37-60.
DOI
|
42 |
Ross, B. H. & Kilbane, M. C. (1997). Effects of Principle Explanation and Superficial Similarity on Analogical Mapping in Problem Solving. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 427-440.
DOI
|
43 |
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, Fla.: Academic Press..
|
44 |
Smith, L. B. (1989). A model of perceptual classification in children and adults. Psychological Review, 96, 125-144.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
45 |
Spearman, C. (1923). The nature of intelligence and the principles of cognition. London: MacMillian.
|
46 |
Creswell, J. W. (2005). 질적 연구방법론: 다섯 가지 전통. (조흥식, 정선욱, 김진숙, 권지성 역). 서울: 학지사. (원저 Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions은 1998년 CA: Sage Publication에서 출판).
|
47 |
Denney, N. W. (1972). A developmental study of free classification in children. Child Development, 43, 221-232.
DOI
|
48 |
Gholson, B., Smither, D., Buhrman, A., Duncan, M. K., & Pierce, K. A. (1997). Children's development of analogical problem-solving skill. In Lyn D. English(Ed.), Mathematical reasoning: Analogies, metaphors, and images(pp. 149-190). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
|
49 |
English, L. D. (1997). Analogies, metaphors, and images: Vehicles for mathematical reasoning. In Lyn D. English(Ed.), Mathematical reasoning: Analogies, metaphors, and images(pp. 3-18). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
|
50 |
Fischbein, E. (1987). Intuition in science and mathematics: An educational approach. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
|
51 |
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive science, 7, 155-170.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
52 |
Gentner, D. (1989). The mechanism of analogical learning. In Stella Vosniadou & Andrew Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning. New York: Cambridge University Press. 199-241.
|
53 |
Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American psychologist, 52, 45-56.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
54 |
Grick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306-355.
DOI
|
55 |
Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1989). Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction. Cognitive Science, 13, 295-355.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
56 |
Holyoak, K. J. (2005). Analogy. In Holyoak, K. J. & Morrison, R. G.(Eds.), The cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning(pp. 117-141). New York: Cambridge University Press.
|
57 |
Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1997). Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
|
58 |
Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (2003). A symbolic-connectionist theory of relational inference and generalizayion. Psychological Review, 110, 220-264.
DOI
|
59 |
Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (1992). Indirect analogical mapping. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth annual conference of the cognitive science society(pp. 516-521). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
|
60 |
Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (1997). Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. Psychological Review, 104, 427-466.
DOI
|
61 |
Holyoak, K. J., & Koh, K. (1987). Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer. Memory & Cognition, 15(4), 332-340.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
62 |
Vygosky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
|
63 |
서보억 (2009). 유추를 활용한 진법의 확장에 대한 수학탐구활동, 국제수학영재교육세미나프로시딩, 14, 39-42.
|
64 |
Pierce, K. A. & Gholson, B. (1994). Surface Similarity and Relational Similarity in the Development of Analogical Problem Solving: Isomorphic and Nonisomorphic Transfer. Developmental Psychology, 30(5), 724-737.
DOI
|
65 |
Grick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1-38.
DOI
|
66 |
Gentner, D. (1982). Are scientific analogies metaphors? In David S. Miall(Ed.), Metaphor: Problems and perspectives(pp. 106-132). Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
|