Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2013.27.1.039

The Study on the Investigation of the Evaluation Standards for Mathematics Teaching according to the teacher's opinion research  

Hwang, Hye Jeang (Chosun University)
Publication Information
Communications of Mathematical Education / v.27, no.1, 2013 , pp. 39-62 More about this Journal
Abstract
On the standards or elements of teaching evaluation, the Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation(KICE) has carried out the following research such as : 1) development of the standards on teaching evaluation between 2004 and 2006, and 2) investigation on the elements of Teacher Knowledge. The purposes of development of evaluation standards for mathematics teaching through those studies were to improve not only mathematics teachers' professionalism but also their own teaching methods or strategies. In this study, the standards were revised and modified by analyzing the results of those studies focused on the knowledge of subject matter knowledge, knowledge of learners' understanding, teaching and learning methods and assessments, and teaching contexts. For this purpose, according to those evaluation domains of each teacher knowledge, elements on teaching evaluation focused on the teacher's knowledge were established using the instructional evaluation framework, which is developed in this study, including the four areas of knowledge obtaining, instructional planning, instructional implementation, and instructional reflection. In this study, 1st and 2nd pilot studies was accomplished for revising evaluation standards and as a result, the procedure for implementing mathematics teaching using evaluation standards was changed to evaluate teachers own teaching using the standards focused on instructional reflection and according to the degree of satisfaction on reflecting their own teaching, standards on knowledge obtaining, instructional planning, instructional implementation would be utilized. Teacher survey is accomplished two times, by the subject of seven teachers. According ot the result of the first teacher questionnaire which was consisted of the essay type of questions on the degree of understanding the content of standards, the evaluation standards were revised. According ot the result of the second teacher questionnaire which was consisted of the essay type of questions on the application of standards, the evaluation standards were revised finally and the way of how to use the standards efficiently was suggested.
Keywords
Reflection on teaching; Subject matter knowledge; Learners' understanding; Teaching and learning methods and assessments; Teaching contexts; Evaluation standards for Mathematics teaching;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 황혜정 (2010c). 교사의 학습자 이해 지식에 초점을 둔 수학 수업 평가 요소 탐색. 한국학교수학회논문집, 13(4), 569-594.
2 황혜정 (2011a). 수학 교과에서의 교사 지식에 기초한 반성적 수업 평가에 관한 연구. 한국학교수학회논문집, 14(2), 123-142.
3 황혜정 (2011b). 수학 수업의 교사 지식에 관한 평가 요소 탐색 - 교수 학습 방법 및 평가를 중심으로 -. 한국학교수학회논문집, 14(3), 241-263.
4 황혜정 (2012). 수학 수업에서 요구되는 교사 지식에 대한 평가 기준 재탐색. 한국수학교육학회 시리즈 E <수학 교육 논문집>, 26(1). 29-55.
5 Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. NY : Basic Books.
6 Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.   DOI
7 임찬빈․이화진․곽영순․강대현․박영석 (2004). 수업 평가 기준 개발 연구(I): 일반기준 및 교과(사회, 과학, 영어) 기준 개발. 연구보고 RRI 2004-5. 서울: 한국교육과정평가원.
8 임찬빈․이화진․서지영․차우규 (2005). 수업 평가 기준 개발 연구(II): 일반 기준 및 교과(영어, 도덕, 체육) 기준 상세화. 연구보고 RRI 2005-3. 서울: 한국교육과정평가원.
9 임찬빈․이화진․최승현․오은순․이경언․이수정․노은희․권순달 (2006). 수업 평가 기준 개발 연구(III): 일반 기준 및 교과(국어, 수학, 기술․가정, 음악, 초등)기준 상세화. 연구보고 RRI 2006-3. 서울: 한국교육과정평가원.
10 최승현 (2007). 교육과정 개정에 따른 수학과 내용 교수 지식(PCK) 연구. 연구보고 RRI 2007-3-2. 서울: 한국교육과정평가원.
11 최승현․강대현․곽영순․장경숙 (2008). 교과별 내용교수지식(PCK) 연구(III) - 중등 초임교사 수업컨설팅을 중심으로- . 연구보고 RRI 2008-2. 서울: 한국교육과정평가원.
12 황혜정 (2010a). 교과 내용 지식(SMK)에 초점을 둔 수학 수업 평가 기준 고찰. 한국학교수학회논문집, 13(1), 45-67.
13 황혜정 (2010b). 수업 상황에 관한 교사 지식의 평가 요소 탐색. 한국학교수학회논문집, 13(3), 397-413.