Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7468/jksmed.2021.24.3.255

Problem Posing in the Instruction of Proof: Bridging Everyday Lesson and Proof  

Kim, Hangil (University of Texas at Austin)
Publication Information
Research in Mathematical Education / v.24, no.3, 2021 , pp. 255-278 More about this Journal
Abstract
Proof serves a critical role in mathematical practices as well as in fostering student's mathematical understanding. However, the research literature accumulates results that there are not many opportunities available for students to engage with proving-related activities and that students' understanding about proof is not promising. This unpromising state of instruction of proof calls for a novel approach to address the aforementioned issues. This study investigated an instruction of proof to explore a pedagogy to teach how to prove. The teacher utilized the way of problem posing to make proving a routine part of everyday lesson and changed the classroom culture to support student proving. The study identified the teacher's support for student proving, the key pedagogical changes that embraced proving as part of everyday lesson, and what changes the teacher made to cultivate the classroom culture to be better suited for establishing a supportive community for student proving. The results indicate that problem posing has a potential to embrace proof into everyday lesson.
Keywords
proof; reasoning; problem posing; high school; pedagogy;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237-246.   DOI
2 Alcock, L., & Inglis, M. (2008). Doctoral students' use of examples in evaluating and proving conjectures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 69, 111-129.   DOI
3 Aristotle. (n.d.). Be a free thinker and don't accept everything you hear as truth. Be critical and evaluate what you believe in. Retrieved August 20, 2020from https://www.azquotes.com/quote/1397505
4 Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2015). Australian curriculum: Mathematics. Retrieved November 20, 2020 from https://australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/mathematics/
5 Balacheff, N. (1988). Aspects of proof in pupils' practice of school mathematics. In D. En Pimm (Ed.), Mathematics, teachers and children (pp. 216-235). London, UK: Hodder & Stoughton.
6 Bieda, K. N., Ji, X., Drwencke, J., & Picard, A. (2014). Reasoning-and-proving opportunities in elementary mathematics textbooks. International Journal of Educational Research, 64, 71-80.   DOI
7 Hanna, G. (2000). Proof, explanation and exploration: An overview. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44(1/2), 5-23.   DOI
8 Ball, D. L., Hoyles, C., Jahnke, H. N., & Movshovitz-Hadar, N. (2002). The teaching of proof. In L. I. Tatsien (Ed.), Proceedings of the international congress of mathematicians (Vol. III) (pp. 907-920). Beijing, China: Higher Education Press.
9 Begle, E. G. (1973). Some lessons learned by SMSG. The Mathematics Teacher, 66(3), 207-214.   DOI
10 Bieda, K. N. (2010). Enacting proof-related tasks in middle school mathematics: Challenges and opportunities. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(4), 351-382.   DOI
11 Brown, S. I., & Walter, M. I. (2014). Problem posing: Reflections and applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Psychology Press.
12 Department for Education. (2014). Mathematics programme of study: Key stage 4 (National curriculum in England). Retrieved March 17, 2020, from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads
13 Cai, J., & Cirillo, M. (2014). What do we know about reasoning and proving? Opportunities and missing opportunities from curriculum analyses. International Journal of Educational Research, 64, 132-140.   DOI
14 Chazan, D. (1993). High school geometry students' justification for their views of empirical evidence and mathematical proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(4), 359-387.   DOI
15 Coe, R. & Ruthven, K. (1994). Proof practices and construct of advanced mathematics students. British Educational Research Journal, 20, 41-53.   DOI
16 Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington DC: Authors.
17 Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
18 de Villiers, M. D. (1990). The role and function of proof in mathematics. Pythagoras, 24, 17-24.
19 Ellis, A. B., Ozgur, Z., Vinsonhaler, R., Dogan, M. F., Carolan, T., Lockwood, E., Lynch, A., Sabouri, P., Knuth, E., & Zaslavsky, O. (2019). Student thinking with examples: The criteriaaffordances-purposes-strategies framework. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 53, 263-283.   DOI
20 Epstein, D., & Levy, S. (1995). Experimentation and proof in mathematics. Notices of the AMS, 42(6), 670-674.
21 Lockwood, E., Ellis, A., & Knuth, E. (2013). Mathematicians' example-related activity when proving conjectures. In Brown, S., Karakok, G., Roh, K., & Oehrtman, M. (Eds.). Proceedings for the Sixteenth Annual Conference on Research on Undergraduate Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 16-28). Denver, CO: Northern Colorado University.
22 Knuth, E. J. (2002a). Teachers' conceptions of proof in the context of secondary school mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5, 61-88.   DOI
23 Knuth, E. J. (2002b). Proof as a tool for learning mathematics. Mathematics Teacher, 95(7), 486-490.   DOI
24 Knuth, E. J. (2002c). Secondary school mathematics teachers' conceptions of proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 379-405.   DOI
25 Knuth, E., Zaslavsky, O., & Ellis, A. (2019). The role and use of examples in learning to prove. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 53, 256-262.   DOI
26 Knuth, E., Zaslavsky, O., Vinsonhaler, R., Gaddis, D., & Fernandez, L. (2019). Proving-related activities. In S. Otten, A. G. Candela, Z. Araujo, C. Haines, & C. Munter (Eds.). Proceedings of the forty-first annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 1718-1722). St. Louis, MO: University of Missouri.
27 Gravemeijer, K., & van Eerde, D. (2009). Design research as a means for building a knowledge base for teachers and teaching in mathematics education. The Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 510-524.   DOI
28 Healy, L., & Hoyles, C. (2000). A study of proof conceptions in algebra. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(4), 396-428.   DOI
29 Hanna, G., & Jahnke, N. (1996). Proof and proving. In A. Bishop, et al. (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 877-908). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
30 Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (1998). Students' proof schemes: Results from exploratory studies. Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education III, 7, 234-282.
31 Iannone, P., Inglis, M., Mejia-Ramos, J. P., Simpson, A., & Weber, K. (2011). Does generating examples aid proof production? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77, 1-14.   DOI
32 Kim, H. (2020). Problem posing as a tool for students to engage in proving. In Sacristan, A. I., Cortes-Zavala, J. C. & Ruiz-Arias, P. M. (Eds.). Mathematics education across cultures: Proceedings of the 42nd Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 2082-2086), Mazatlan, Sinaloa: Mexico.
33 Maher, C. A., & Martino, A. M. (1996). The development of the idea of mathematical proof: A 5-year case study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(2), 194-214.   DOI
34 Martin, W. G., & Harel, G. (1989). Proof frames of preservice elementary teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(1), 41-51.   DOI
35 Moore, R. C. (1994). Making the transition to formal proof. Educational Studies in mathematics, 27(3), 249-266.   DOI
36 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
37 Polya, G. (1954). Mathematics and plausible reasoning: Induction and analogy in mathematics (Vol. I). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38 Schoenfeld, A. H. (1994). What do we know about mathematics curricula? The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 13(1), 55-80.   DOI
39 Porteous, K. (1990). What do children really believe? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21(6), 589-598.   DOI
40 Lockwood, E., Ellis, A., Knuth, E., Dogan, M. F., & Williams, C. (2013). Strategically chosen examples leading to proof insight: A case study of a mathematician's proving process. In Martinez, M. & Castro Superfne, A. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 245-252). Chicago, IL: University of Illinois at Chicago.
41 Selden, A., & Selden, J. (2003). Validations of proofs considered as texts: Can undergraduates tell whether an argument proves a theorem? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), 4-36.   DOI
42 Rowland, T. (2002). Generic proofs in number theory. In S. R. Campbell & R. Zazkis (Eds.), Learning and teaching number theory: Research in cognition and instruction (pp. 157-183). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
43 Schoenfeld, A. H. (1979). Explicit heuristic training as a variable in problem-solving performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 10(3), 173-187.   DOI
44 Silver, E. A. (1994). On mathematical problem posing. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 19-28.
45 Stylianides, A. J., & Ball, D. L. (2008). Understanding and describing mathematical knowledge for teaching: Knowledge about proof for engaging students in the activity of proving. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(4), 307-332.   DOI
46 Stylianides, A. J., & Stylianides, G. J. (2009). Proof constructions and evaluations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(2), 237-253.   DOI
47 Stylianides, G. J. (2009) Reasoning-and-proving in school mathematics textbooks. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 11(4), 258-288.   DOI
48 Varghese, T. (2009). Secondary-level student teachers' conceptions of mathematical proof. Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers, 1, 1-14.
49 Stylianides, G. J., & Stylianides, A. J. (2009). Facilitating the transition from empirical arguments to proof. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(3), 314-352.   DOI
50 Thompson, D. R., & Senk, S. L. (2014). The same geometry textbook does not mean the same classroom enactment. ZDM, 46(5), 781-795.   DOI
51 Ozgur, Z., Ellis, A. B., Vinsonhaler, R., Dogan, M. F., & Knuth, E. (2019). From examples to proof: Purposes, strategies, and affordances of example use. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 53, 284-303.   DOI
52 Remillard, J. T., & Bryans, M. B. (2004). Teacher's orientations toward mathematics curriculum materials: Implications for teacher learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 352-388.   DOI
53 Schoenfeld, A. H. (1983). Beyond the purely cognitive: Belief systems, social cognitions, and metacognitions as driving forces in intellectual performance. Cognitive science, 7(4), 329-363.   DOI
54 Senk, S. (1985). How well do students write geometry proofs? The Mathematics Teacher, 78(6), 448-456.   DOI
55 Weber, K., & Alcock, L. (2004). Semantic and syntactic proof productions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56(3), 209-234.   DOI
56 Hoyles, C. (1997). The curricular shaping of students' approaches to proof. For the Learning of Mathematics, 17(1), 7-16.
57 Skilling, K., & Stylianides, G. J. (2020). Using vignettes in educational research: A framework for vignette construction. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 43(5), 541-556.   DOI
58 Stylianides, G. J., Stylianides, A. J., & Weber, K. (2016). Research on the teaching and learning of proof: Taking stock and moving forward. In Cai, J. (Ed.). Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 237-266). Reston, VA: NCTM.
59 Stylianides, A. J. (2007). Proof and proving in school mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(3), 289-321.
60 Stylianides, G. J. (2008). Investigating the guidance offered to teachers in curriculum materials: The case of proof in mathematics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(1), 191-215.   DOI
61 Thompson, D. R., Senk, S. L., & Johnson, G. J. (2012). Opportunities to learn reasoning and proof in high school mathematics textbooks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(3), 253-295.   DOI
62 Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458-477.   DOI
63 Knuth, E., Kim, H., Zaslavsky, O., Vinsonhaler, R., Gaddis, D., & Fernandez, L. (2020). Teachers' views about the role of examples in proving-related activities. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, Special Issue, 115-134.
64 Ellis, A., Ozgur, Z., & Reiten, L. (2019). Teacher moves for supporting student reasoning. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 31, 107-132.   DOI
65 Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
66 Fischbein, E., & Kedem, I. (1982). Proof and certitude in the development of mathematical thinking. In A. Vermandel (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematical Education (pp. 128-131). Antwerp, Belgium: PME.
67 Zack, V. (1999). Everyday and mathematical language in children's argumentation about proof. Educational Review, 51(2), 129-146.   DOI
68 Knuth, E. J., Choppin, J., & Bieda, K. (2009). Middle school students' production of mathematical justifications. In Stylianou, D. A., Blanton, M. L., & Knuth, E. J. (Eds.), Teaching and learning proof across the grades: A K-16 perspective (pp. 153-170). New York, NY: Routledge.
69 Lynch, A. G., & Lockwood, E. (2019). A comparison between mathematicians' and students' use of examples for conjecturing and proving. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 53, 323-338.   DOI
70 Ministry of Education. (2011). Revised Korean mathematics curriculum. Seoul, Korea: Ministry of Education.