1 |
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
|
2 |
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
|
3 |
Kilpatrick, J. Swafford, & B. Findell (Eds.) (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
|
4 |
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
|
5 |
Radloff, J., & Guzey, S. (2017). Investigating changes in preservice teachers' conceptions of STEM education following video analysis and reflection. School Science and Mathematics, 117(3-4), 158-167.
DOI
|
6 |
Roberston, Atkins, Levin, & Richards, (2016). What is responsive teaching? In Robertson, A. D., Scherr, R., & Hammer, D. (Eds.), Responsive teaching in science and mathematics (pp. 1-35). Routledge.
|
7 |
Russ, R. S., & Luna, M. J. (2013). Inferring teacher epistemological framing from local patterns in teacher noticing. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 284-314.
DOI
|
8 |
Sun, J., & van Es, E. A. (2015). An exploratory study of the influence that analyzing teaching has on preservice teachers' classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(3), 201-214.
DOI
|
9 |
Tank, K. M., DuPont, M., & Estapa, A. T. (2020). Analysis of elements that support implementation of high- quality engineering design within the elementary classroom. School Science and Mathematics, 120(7), 379-390.
DOI
|
10 |
van Es, E. A. (2011). A framework for learning to notice student thinking. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers' eyes (pp. 164-181). Routledge.
|
11 |
Lesseig, K., Casey, S., Monson, D., Krupa, E. E., & Huey, M. (2016). Developing an interview module to support secondary pst's noticing of student thinking. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 5(1), 29-46.
DOI
|
12 |
Guzey, S. S., Tank, K. M., Wang, H.-H., Roehrig, G. H., & Moore, T. J. (2014), A high-quality professional development for teachers of grades 3-6 for implementing engineering into classrooms. School Science and Mathematics, 114(3), 139-149.
DOI
|
13 |
Hammer, D., Goldberg, F., & Fargason, S. (2012). Responsive teaching and the beginnings of energy in a third grade classroom. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 6(1), 51-72.
|
14 |
Johnson, A. W., Wendell, K. B., & Watkins, J. (2017). Examining Experienced Teachers' Noticing of and Responses to Students' Engineering. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 7(1), 25-35.
|
15 |
Katehi, L., Pearson, G., & Feder, M. (2009). National academy of engineering and national research council report: Engineering in K-12 education. Washington: National Academies.
|
16 |
Kellman, P. J., & Massey, C. M. (2013). Perceptual learning, cognition, and expertise. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 58, pp. 117-165). Academic Press.
|
17 |
Luna, M. J., Selmer, S. J., & Rye, J. A. (2018). Teachers' noticing of students' thinking in science through classroom artifacts: In what ways are science and engineering practices evident? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(2), 148-172.
DOI
|
18 |
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
|
19 |
Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2011). Building a common core for learning to teach: And connecting professional learning to practice. American Educator, 35(2), 17-21, 38-39.
|
20 |
National Research Council. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
|
21 |
McCormick, M., & Wendell, K. B., & O'Connell, B. P. (2014). Student videos as a tool for elementary teacher development in teaching engineering: What do teachers notice? (Research to Practice) Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana. https://peer.asee.org/23060
|
22 |
Colestock, A. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2016). What teachers notice when they notice student thinking: Teacher-identified purposes for attending to students' mathematical thinking. In A. D. Robertson, R. E. Scherr, & D. Hammer (Eds.), Responsive teaching in science and mathematics (pp. 144-162). Routledge.
|
23 |
Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P-12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369-387.
DOI
|
24 |
Amador, J. M., Carter, I., Hudson, R. A., & Galindo, E. (2017). Following a teacher's mathematical and scientific noticing across career progression from field experiences to classroom teaching. In E. Schack, M. Fisher, & J. Wilhelm (Eds.), Teacher noticing: Bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks (pp. 161-181). Springer, Cham.
|
25 |
Amador, J. M., Estapa, A., Kosko, K., & Weston, T. (2021). Prospective teachers' noticing and mathematical decisions to respond: Using technology to approximate practice. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(1), 3-22.
DOI
|
26 |
Auerbach, A. J., Higgins, M., Brickman, P., & Andrews, T. C. (2018). Teacher knowledge for active-learning instruction: Expert-novice comparison reveals differences. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 17(1), ar12.
DOI
|
27 |
Crotty, E. A., Guzey, S. S., Roehrig, G. H., Glancy, A. W., Ring-Whalen, E. A., & Moore, T. J. (2017). Approaches to integrating engineering in STEM units and student achievement gains. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 7(2), 1-14.
|
28 |
Custer, R. L., & Daugherty, J. (2009). Professional development for teachers of engineering: Research and related activities. The Bridge, 39(3), 18-24.
|
29 |
Dalvi, T., & Wendell, K. (2017). Using student video cases to assess pre-service elementary teachers' engineering teaching responsiveness. Research in Science Education, 47(5), 1101-1125.
DOI
|
30 |
Stockero, S. L., Leatham, K. R., Van Zoest, L. R., & Peterson, B. E. (2017). Noticing distinctions among and within instances of student mathematical thinking In E. Schack, M. Fisher, J. Wilhelm (Eds.), Teacher noticing: Bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks (pp. 467-480). Springer, Cham.
|
31 |
Berliner, D. C. (2001). Learning about and learning from expert teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 463-482.
DOI
|
32 |
Ball, D. L., Lubienski, S. T., & Mewborn, D. S. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers' mathematical knowledge. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, 4, (pp. 433-456). New York: Macmillan.
|
33 |
Barnhart, T., & van Es, E. (2015). Studying teacher noticing: Examining the relationship among pre-service science teachers' ability to attend, analyze and respond to student thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 83-93.
DOI
|
34 |
Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Weiss, I. R., Malzahn, K. M., Campbell, K. M., & Weis, A. M. (2013). Report of the 2012 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
|
35 |
Benedict-Chambers, A. (2016). Using tools to promote novice teacher noticing of science teaching practices in post-rehearsal discussions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 28-44.
DOI
|
36 |
Berliner, D. C. (1994). Expertise: The wonders of exemplary performance. In J. N. Mangieri & C. C. Block (Eds.), Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students (pp. 141-186). Ft. Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
|
37 |
Capobianco, B. M., & Rupp, M. (2014). STEM teachers' planned and enacted attempts at implementing engineering design- based instruction. School Science and Mathematics, 114(6), 258-270.
DOI
|
38 |
Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., & Franke, M. L. (1996). Cognitively guided instruction: A knowledge base for reform in primary mathematics instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 97(1), 3-20.
DOI
|
39 |
Chase, C. C., Malkiewich, L., & S Kumar, A. (2019). Learning to notice science concepts in engineering activities and transfer situations. Science Education, 103(2), 440-471.
DOI
|
40 |
Daugherty, J. L., & Custer, R. L. (2012). Secondary level engineering professional development: Content, pedagogy, and challenges. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22(1), 51-64.
DOI
|
41 |
Estapa, A. T., Amador, J., Kosko, K. W., Weston, T., de Araujo, Z., & Aming-Attai, R. (2018). Preservice teachers' articulated noticing through pedagogies of practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 21(4), 387-415.
DOI
|
42 |
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199.
DOI
|
43 |
Diefes-Dux, H. A. (2014). In-service teacher professional development in engineering education: Early years. In S. Purzer, J. Strobel, & M. Cardella (Eds.), Engineering in precollege settings: Synthesizing research, policy, and practices. (pp. 233-257). Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
|
44 |
Moore, T. J., Glancy, A. W., Tank, K. M., Kersten, J. A., Smith, K. A., & Stohlmann, M. S. (2014). A framework for quality K-12 engineering education: Research and development. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 4(1), 1-13.
|
45 |
Erickson, F. (2011). On noticing teacher noticing. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers' eyes (pp. 47-64). Routledge.
|
46 |
Dreher, A., & Kuntze, S. (2015). Teachers' professional knowledge and noticing: The case of multiple representations in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 88(1), 89-114.
DOI
|
47 |
Estapa, A., Pinnow, R.J., & Chval, K.B. (2016). Video as a professional development tool to support novice teachers as they learn to teach English language learners. The New Educator, 12(1), 85-104.
DOI
|
48 |
Estapa, A., & Tank, K. M. (2017). Supporting integrated STEM in the elementary classroom: A professional development approach centered on an engineering design challenge. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 1-16.
DOI
|
49 |
Guskey, T. R., & Yoon, K. S. (2009). What works in professional development? Phi Delta Kappan, 90(7), 495-500.
DOI
|
50 |
van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers' "learning to notice" in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244-276.
DOI
|
51 |
Vattam, S. S., & Kolodner, J. L. (2008). On foundations of technological support for addressing challenges facing design-based science learning. Pragmatics & Cognition, 16(2), 406-437.
DOI
|
52 |
Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.
DOI
|
53 |
Watkins, J., McCormick, M., Wendell, K. B., Spencer, K., Milto, E., Portsmore, M., & Hammer, D. (2018). Data-based conjectures for supporting responsive teaching in engineering design with elementary teachers. Science Education, 102(3), 548-570.
DOI
|
54 |
Wendell, K. B., Watkins, J., & Johnson, A. W. (2016). Noticing, assessing, and responding to students' engineering: Exploring a responsive teaching approach to engineering design. In Proceedings of the 123rd American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (pp. 26-29).
|
55 |
Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2011). Ambitious pedagogy by novice teachers: Who benefits from tool-supported collaborative inquiry into practice and why? Teachers College Record, 113(7), 1311-1360.
DOI
|
56 |
Levin, D. M., Hammer, D., & Coffey, J. E. (2009). Novice teachers' attention to student thinking. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(2), 142-154.
DOI
|