Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7468/jksmed.2021.24.3.201

Utilizing Teacher Noticing within a Representation of an Elementary Engineering Lesson to Support Responsive Teaching in the Classroom  

Estapa, Anne (University of Iowa)
Tank, Kristina M. (Iowa State University)
DuPont, Michael (Krell Institute)
Publication Information
Research in Mathematical Education / v.24, no.3, 2021 , pp. 201-228 More about this Journal
Abstract
Teacher noticing has been termed consequential to teaching because what you see and do not see impacts decisions made within the classroom. Further, how a teacher responds to student thinking depends on what a teacher sees in student thinking. Within this study we sought to understand what teachers noticed within an engineering lesson and the decisions made as a result of that noticing. Findings indicate that student teachers and cooperating teachers drew on their pedagogical knowledge for decisions, rather than taking up the integrated content of student thinking and understanding. These findings serve as a guide for the experiences needed to engage in the complex work of teaching or, more specifically, implementing engineering into instruction through a responsive teaching frame.
Keywords
Elementary Engineering; Noticing; Responsive Teaching;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
2 NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
3 Kilpatrick, J. Swafford, & B. Findell (Eds.) (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
4 National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
5 Radloff, J., & Guzey, S. (2017). Investigating changes in preservice teachers' conceptions of STEM education following video analysis and reflection. School Science and Mathematics, 117(3-4), 158-167.   DOI
6 Roberston, Atkins, Levin, & Richards, (2016). What is responsive teaching? In Robertson, A. D., Scherr, R., & Hammer, D. (Eds.), Responsive teaching in science and mathematics (pp. 1-35). Routledge.
7 Russ, R. S., & Luna, M. J. (2013). Inferring teacher epistemological framing from local patterns in teacher noticing. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 284-314.   DOI
8 Sun, J., & van Es, E. A. (2015). An exploratory study of the influence that analyzing teaching has on preservice teachers' classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(3), 201-214.   DOI
9 Tank, K. M., DuPont, M., & Estapa, A. T. (2020). Analysis of elements that support implementation of high- quality engineering design within the elementary classroom. School Science and Mathematics, 120(7), 379-390.   DOI
10 van Es, E. A. (2011). A framework for learning to notice student thinking. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers' eyes (pp. 164-181). Routledge.
11 Lesseig, K., Casey, S., Monson, D., Krupa, E. E., & Huey, M. (2016). Developing an interview module to support secondary pst's noticing of student thinking. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 5(1), 29-46.   DOI
12 Guzey, S. S., Tank, K. M., Wang, H.-H., Roehrig, G. H., & Moore, T. J. (2014), A high-quality professional development for teachers of grades 3-6 for implementing engineering into classrooms. School Science and Mathematics, 114(3), 139-149.   DOI
13 Hammer, D., Goldberg, F., & Fargason, S. (2012). Responsive teaching and the beginnings of energy in a third grade classroom. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 6(1), 51-72.
14 Johnson, A. W., Wendell, K. B., & Watkins, J. (2017). Examining Experienced Teachers' Noticing of and Responses to Students' Engineering. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 7(1), 25-35.
15 Katehi, L., Pearson, G., & Feder, M. (2009). National academy of engineering and national research council report: Engineering in K-12 education. Washington: National Academies.
16 Kellman, P. J., & Massey, C. M. (2013). Perceptual learning, cognition, and expertise. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 58, pp. 117-165). Academic Press.
17 Luna, M. J., Selmer, S. J., & Rye, J. A. (2018). Teachers' noticing of students' thinking in science through classroom artifacts: In what ways are science and engineering practices evident? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(2), 148-172.   DOI
18 Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19 Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2011). Building a common core for learning to teach: And connecting professional learning to practice. American Educator, 35(2), 17-21, 38-39.
20 National Research Council. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
21 McCormick, M., & Wendell, K. B., & O'Connell, B. P. (2014). Student videos as a tool for elementary teacher development in teaching engineering: What do teachers notice? (Research to Practice) Paper presented at 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana. https://peer.asee.org/23060
22 Colestock, A. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2016). What teachers notice when they notice student thinking: Teacher-identified purposes for attending to students' mathematical thinking. In A. D. Robertson, R. E. Scherr, & D. Hammer (Eds.), Responsive teaching in science and mathematics (pp. 144-162). Routledge.
23 Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P-12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369-387.   DOI
24 Amador, J. M., Carter, I., Hudson, R. A., & Galindo, E. (2017). Following a teacher's mathematical and scientific noticing across career progression from field experiences to classroom teaching. In E. Schack, M. Fisher, & J. Wilhelm (Eds.), Teacher noticing: Bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks (pp. 161-181). Springer, Cham.
25 Amador, J. M., Estapa, A., Kosko, K., & Weston, T. (2021). Prospective teachers' noticing and mathematical decisions to respond: Using technology to approximate practice. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(1), 3-22.   DOI
26 Auerbach, A. J., Higgins, M., Brickman, P., & Andrews, T. C. (2018). Teacher knowledge for active-learning instruction: Expert-novice comparison reveals differences. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 17(1), ar12.   DOI
27 Crotty, E. A., Guzey, S. S., Roehrig, G. H., Glancy, A. W., Ring-Whalen, E. A., & Moore, T. J. (2017). Approaches to integrating engineering in STEM units and student achievement gains. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 7(2), 1-14.
28 Custer, R. L., & Daugherty, J. (2009). Professional development for teachers of engineering: Research and related activities. The Bridge, 39(3), 18-24.
29 Dalvi, T., & Wendell, K. (2017). Using student video cases to assess pre-service elementary teachers' engineering teaching responsiveness. Research in Science Education, 47(5), 1101-1125.   DOI
30 Stockero, S. L., Leatham, K. R., Van Zoest, L. R., & Peterson, B. E. (2017). Noticing distinctions among and within instances of student mathematical thinking In E. Schack, M. Fisher, J. Wilhelm (Eds.), Teacher noticing: Bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks (pp. 467-480). Springer, Cham.
31 Berliner, D. C. (2001). Learning about and learning from expert teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 463-482.   DOI
32 Ball, D. L., Lubienski, S. T., & Mewborn, D. S. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers' mathematical knowledge. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, 4, (pp. 433-456). New York: Macmillan.
33 Barnhart, T., & van Es, E. (2015). Studying teacher noticing: Examining the relationship among pre-service science teachers' ability to attend, analyze and respond to student thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 83-93.   DOI
34 Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Weiss, I. R., Malzahn, K. M., Campbell, K. M., & Weis, A. M. (2013). Report of the 2012 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
35 Benedict-Chambers, A. (2016). Using tools to promote novice teacher noticing of science teaching practices in post-rehearsal discussions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 28-44.   DOI
36 Berliner, D. C. (1994). Expertise: The wonders of exemplary performance. In J. N. Mangieri & C. C. Block (Eds.), Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students (pp. 141-186). Ft. Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
37 Capobianco, B. M., & Rupp, M. (2014). STEM teachers' planned and enacted attempts at implementing engineering design- based instruction. School Science and Mathematics, 114(6), 258-270.   DOI
38 Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., & Franke, M. L. (1996). Cognitively guided instruction: A knowledge base for reform in primary mathematics instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 97(1), 3-20.   DOI
39 Chase, C. C., Malkiewich, L., & S Kumar, A. (2019). Learning to notice science concepts in engineering activities and transfer situations. Science Education, 103(2), 440-471.   DOI
40 Daugherty, J. L., & Custer, R. L. (2012). Secondary level engineering professional development: Content, pedagogy, and challenges. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22(1), 51-64.   DOI
41 Estapa, A. T., Amador, J., Kosko, K. W., Weston, T., de Araujo, Z., & Aming-Attai, R. (2018). Preservice teachers' articulated noticing through pedagogies of practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 21(4), 387-415.   DOI
42 Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199.   DOI
43 Diefes-Dux, H. A. (2014). In-service teacher professional development in engineering education: Early years. In S. Purzer, J. Strobel, & M. Cardella (Eds.), Engineering in precollege settings: Synthesizing research, policy, and practices. (pp. 233-257). Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
44 Moore, T. J., Glancy, A. W., Tank, K. M., Kersten, J. A., Smith, K. A., & Stohlmann, M. S. (2014). A framework for quality K-12 engineering education: Research and development. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 4(1), 1-13.
45 Erickson, F. (2011). On noticing teacher noticing. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers' eyes (pp. 47-64). Routledge.
46 Dreher, A., & Kuntze, S. (2015). Teachers' professional knowledge and noticing: The case of multiple representations in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 88(1), 89-114.   DOI
47 Estapa, A., Pinnow, R.J., & Chval, K.B. (2016). Video as a professional development tool to support novice teachers as they learn to teach English language learners. The New Educator, 12(1), 85-104.   DOI
48 Estapa, A., & Tank, K. M. (2017). Supporting integrated STEM in the elementary classroom: A professional development approach centered on an engineering design challenge. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 1-16.   DOI
49 Guskey, T. R., & Yoon, K. S. (2009). What works in professional development? Phi Delta Kappan, 90(7), 495-500.   DOI
50 van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers' "learning to notice" in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244-276.   DOI
51 Vattam, S. S., & Kolodner, J. L. (2008). On foundations of technological support for addressing challenges facing design-based science learning. Pragmatics & Cognition, 16(2), 406-437.   DOI
52 Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.   DOI
53 Watkins, J., McCormick, M., Wendell, K. B., Spencer, K., Milto, E., Portsmore, M., & Hammer, D. (2018). Data-based conjectures for supporting responsive teaching in engineering design with elementary teachers. Science Education, 102(3), 548-570.   DOI
54 Wendell, K. B., Watkins, J., & Johnson, A. W. (2016). Noticing, assessing, and responding to students' engineering: Exploring a responsive teaching approach to engineering design. In Proceedings of the 123rd American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (pp. 26-29).
55 Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2011). Ambitious pedagogy by novice teachers: Who benefits from tool-supported collaborative inquiry into practice and why? Teachers College Record, 113(7), 1311-1360.   DOI
56 Levin, D. M., Hammer, D., & Coffey, J. E. (2009). Novice teachers' attention to student thinking. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(2), 142-154.   DOI