Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7468/jksmec.2021.24.2.83

Preservice Elementary Mathematics Teachers' Curricular Noticing: Focusing on the Lesson Planning for Rate  

Cho, Mi Kyung (Ewha Womans University)
Publication Information
Education of Primary School Mathematics / v.24, no.2, 2021 , pp. 83-102 More about this Journal
Abstract
Curricular noticing is about how teachers understand the content and pedagogical opportunities inherent in curriculum materials. Since the enacted curriculum differs depending on which aspect of the curriculum material is paid attention to and how to interpret it, it is necessary to focus on Curricular Attending and Curricular Interpreting in Curricular Noticing for enhancing the teaching expertise of preservice teachers. First, this study categorized the objects that preservice elementary mathematics teachers attended when planning the lesson for rate. Second, in order to find out the reason for paying attention to those objects, it was analyzed what factors were related to interpret. By discussing the results, implications were drawn on how to use Curricular Noticing in preservice teacher education to enhance the pedagogical design competency of preservice elementary mathematics teachers.
Keywords
curricular noticing; curricular attending; curricular interpreting; rate; preservice elementary mathematics teacher;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Park, S. Y., & Lee, K. H. (2018). The comparison and analysis of models on ratio and rate in elementary mathematics textbooks: Centering on multiplicative perspectives on proportional relationships and the structure of proportion situations. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 21(2), 237-260.   DOI
2 Chang, H. W., Lim, M. I., Yu, M. G., Park, H. M., Kim, J. S., & Lee, H. Y. (2018). The application of double number line in elementary school mathematics education. School Mathematics, 20(1), 227-249.   DOI
3 Ministry of Education (2015). Mathematics curriculum. Ministry of Education Notice 2015-74 [supplement 8].
4 Ministry of Education (2018). National plans for diversification of textbooks and free publication system, Retrieved from https://www.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/view.do?boardID=295&lev=0&statusYN=W&s=moe&m=020401&opType=N&boardSeq=76393 (2021.03.15.)
5 Ministry of Education (2019a). Korean national elementary mathematics 6-1. Seoul: Visang Education.
6 Ministry of Education (2019b). Korean national elementary mathematics activity book 6-1. Seoul: Visang Education.
7 Seo, E. M., Pang, J. S., & Lee, J. Y. (2017). An analysis of lessons to teach proportional reasoning with visual models-Focused on ratio table, double number line, and double tape diagram. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 27(4), 791-810.
8 Yoo, H. J., Cho, Y. M., Na, G. S., Go, E. S., Go, J. H., & Lee,.D. H. (2019). Elementary Mathematics Textbook Research and Guidance. Gyeonggi: Dongmyeongsa.
9 Chang, H. W., Lim, M. I., Yu, M. G., Park, H. M., Kim, J. S., & Lee, H. Y. (2017). A comparative analysis of ratio and rate in elementary mathematics textbook. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 21(1), 135-160.
10 Chong, Y. O. (2015). Teaching proportional reasoning in elementary school mathematics. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 25(1), 21-58.
11 Jeong, E. S. (2003). An educational analysis on ratio concept. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 13(3), 247-265.
12 Choi, J. S. (2019). Reflection on Korea mathematics curriculum through analyzing TIMSS 2015 'Number' Domain. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19(11), 1211-1233.
13 Choy, B. H., Thomas, M. O., & Yoon, C. (2017). The FOCUS framework: characterising productive noticing during lesson planning, delivery and review. In E. O. Schack, M. H. Fisher, & J. A. Wilhelm (Eds.), Teacher noticing: Bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks (pp. 445-466). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
14 Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). 조흥식, 정선욱, 김진숙, 권지성 역 (2010). 질적 연구방법론-다섯 가지 접근. 서울: 학지사.
15 Warshauer, H., Starkey, C., Herrera, C. A., & Smith, S. (2019). Developing prospective teachers' noticing and notions of productive struggle with video analysis in a mathematics content course. Journal of Mathematcis Teacher Education, 1-33.
16 Streefland, L. (1985). Search for the Roots of Ratio: Some Thoughts on the Long Term Learning Process (Towards... A Theory): Part II: The Outline of the Long Term Learning Process. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 16(1), 75-94.   DOI
17 Sherin, M. G., & Drake, C. (2009). Curriculum strategy framework: Investigating patterns in teachers' use of a reform based elementary mathematics curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41(4), 467-500.   DOI
18 Tyminski, A. M., Simpson, A. J., Land, T. J., Drake, C., & Dede, E. (2020). Prospective elementary mathematics teachers' noticing of childrens' mathematics: a focus on extending moves. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1-29.
19 Kang, H. I., & Choi Eun Ah(2015). Teacher knowledge necessary to address student erros and difficulties about ratio and rate. School Mathematics, 17(4), 613-632.
20 Webb, D. C., Boswinkel, N., & Dekker, T. (2008). Beneath the tip of the iceberg: Using representations to support student understanding. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 14(2), 110-113   DOI
21 Park, S. A., & Oh, Y. Y. (2017). An analysis of teachers' pedagogical content knowledge about teaching ratio and rate. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 21(1), 215-241.
22 Ministry of Education (2019c). Korean national elementary mathematics 6-1 teachers' guide. Seoul: Visang Education.
23 Ku, N. Y., & Lee, K. H. (2020b). A study on middle school teachers' geometric unit curriculum material use A case of teacher community. School Mathematics, 22(2), 251-275.   DOI
24 Ku, N. Y., Tak, B. J., Choi, I. Y., & Kang, H. Y. (2019). An analysis of preservice mathematics teachers' reading of curriculum materials: Focused on conditional probability. The Mathematical Education, 58(3), 347-365.   DOI
25 Park, H. O., & Park, M. G. (2012). An analysis on the epistemological obstacles of elementary students in the learning of ratio and rate. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 15(2), 159-170.   DOI
26 Park, H. J., & Jeong, E. S. (2010). A comparative analysis on units about ratio and rate between Korean mathematics textbook and MIC textbook. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 14(3), 769-788.
27 Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is-or might be-the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform?. Educational researcher, 25(9), 6-14.   DOI
28 Beckmann, S., & Izsak, A. (2015). Two perspectives on proportional relationships: Extending complementary origins of multiplication in terms of quantities. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(1), 17-38.   DOI
29 Amador, J. M., Males, L. M., Earnest, D., & Dietiker, L. (2017). Curricular noticing: Theory on and practice of teachers' curricular use. In E. O. Schack, M. H. Fisher, & J. A. Wilhelm (Eds.), Teacher noticing: Bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks (pp. 427-443). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
30 Dietiker, L., Males, L. M., Amador, J. M., & Earnest, D. (2018). Research Commentary: Curricular Noticing: A Framework to Describe Teachers' Interactions With Curriculum Materials. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(5), 521-532.   DOI
31 Sang, K. A., Kim, K. H., Park, S. W., Jeon, S. K., Park, M. M., & Lee, J. W. (2020). The Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS): Finding form TIMSS 2019 for Korea. Chungbuk: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
32 Grossman, P., & Thompson, C. (2004). Curriculum Materials: Scaffolds for New Teacher Learning? A Research Report. Document R-04-1. Center for the study of teaching and policy.
33 Yim, J. H., & Lee, H. S. (2015). Visual representations for improving proportional reasoning in solving word problems. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 25(2), 189-206.
34 Brown, M. (2009). Toward a theory of curriculum design and use: Understanding the teacher-tool relationship. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 17-37). New York, NY: Routledge.
35 Choy, B. H., & Dindyal, J. (2021). Productive teacher noticing and affordances of typical problems. ZDM, 1-18.
36 Earnest, D. & Amador, J. M. (2019). Lesson planimation: prospective elementary teachers' interactions with mathematics curricula. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 22(1), 37-68.   DOI
37 Land, T. J., Tyminski, A. M., & Drake, C. (2015). Examining pre-service elementary mathematics teachers' reading of educative curriculum materials. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51, 16-26.   DOI
38 Ivars, P., Fernandez, C., Llinares, S., & Choy, B. H. (2018). Enhancing noticing: using a hypothetical learning trajectory to improve pre-service primary teachers' professional discourse. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(11), em1599.
39 Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., & Phillip, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children's mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169-202.
40 Lamon, S. J. (2007). Rational numbers and proportional reasoning: Toward a theoretical framework for research. In F. Lester (Ed), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 629-666). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
41 NCTM (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. 류희찬 외 역 (2007). 학교수학을 위한 원리와 규준. 서울: 경문사.
42 Lloyd, G. M. (2009). School mathematics curriculum materials for teachers' learning: future elementary teachers' interactions with curriculum materials in a mathematics course in the United States. ZDM, 41, 763-775.   DOI
43 Lobato, J., Ellis, A. B., Charles, R. I., & Zbiek, R. M. (2010). Developing essential understanding of ratios, proportions, and proportional reasoning. 박정숙, 강현영, 고은성, 이동환 역 (2016). 비, 비례, 비례추론의 필수 이해. 서울: 교우사.
44 Mason, J., & Johnston-Wilder, S. (2006). Designing and using mathematical tasks. 권오남 외 역 (2015). 수학 과제의 설계와 활용. 서울: 경문사.
45 Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211-246.   DOI
46 Remillard, J. T. (2013). Examining resources and re-sourcing as insights into teaching. ZDM, 45(7), 925-927.   DOI
47 Roth-McDuffie, A., Choppin, J., Drake, C., & Davis, J. (2018). Middle school mathematics teachers' orientations and noticing of features of mathematics curriculum materials. International Journal of Educational Research, 92, 173-187.   DOI
48 Choppin, J. (2011). Learned adaptations: teachers' understanding and use of curriculum resources. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(5), 331-353.   DOI
49 Shield, M., & Dole, S. (2013). Assessing the potential of mathematics textbooks to promote deep learning. Educational studies in mathematics, 82(2), 183-199.   DOI
50 Lamon, S. J. (1999). Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding : Essential context knowledge and instructional strategies for teachers. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
51 Remillard, J. T. (2000). Can curriculum materials support teachers' learning? Two fourth grade teachers' use of a new mathematics text. The Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 331-350.   DOI
52 Roth-McDuffie, A., & Mather, M. (2009). Middle school mathematics teachers' use of curricular reasoning in a collaborative professional development project. In J. T., Remillar, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 302-320). New York, NY: Routledge.