Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7468/jksmec.2017.20.2.131

An Effect of Discussion and Debate Instruction on Mathematical Achievements and Attitudes in Elementary Mathematics Class  

Choi, Moro (Garak Elementary School)
Ahn, Byounggon (Department of Mathematics Education, Gwangju National University of Education)
Publication Information
Education of Primary School Mathematics / v.20, no.2, 2017 , pp. 131-142 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to examine the effect of debate and discussion instruction in mathematics class on mathematics study achievements and attitudes in elementary school. To conduct the research, two classes were verified as the homogeneous groups by a preliminary examination on the fourth grade of J elementary school. After mathematics class, the subjects were conducted the same mathematics study achievement and attitude tests in two groups and were analyzed with descriptive statistics, independent t-test, t-test. Accordingly, debate and discussion instruction in mathematics class is more effective than regular lecture method instruction. debate and discussion instruction in mathematics classes are believed students will participate in the question and understand the mathematical principles and concepts themselves through action to solve the problem and influenced I have a positive attitude towards mathematics.
Keywords
Elementary mathematics; Discussion and Deba te instruction; Mathematical Achievements; Attitudes;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 교육부(2014). 수학 4-가 교사용 지도서. 교육부.(Ministry of Education (2014). Mathematics 4-Ga Teacher's Guide. Ministry of Education.)
2 교육부(2015). 제2차 수학교육 종합계획. http://www.moe.go.kr/에서 2016년 7월 인출.(Ministry of Education (2015). The 2nd Mathematics Education Comprehensive Plan. Draw in July 2016 at http://www.moe.go.kr/.)
3 김진호. 이지은. Jung Colen. 이대현.김상미 (2016). 초등수학교실토론. 서울 : 경문사.(Kim, J. H., Lee, J. E., Jung Colen., Lee, D. H. & Kim, S. M. (2016). Elementary Mathematics Classroom Discussion. Seoul: Gyeongmunsa.)
4 왕경수. 정혜영. 김계연(2004). 사회적 구성주의 수학 수업 모형 개발 및 적용 연구. 초등교육연구, 16(1), 389-417.(Wang, K. S., Chung, H. Y. & Kim, G. H. (2004), A Study on the Development and Application of Mathematical Instruction Model of Social Constructivism. Elementary Education Research, 16(1), 389-417.)
5 연합뉴스(2014). 수학교육은 이렇게! 필즈상 수상자들의 조언. http://www.yonhapnews.co.kr/에서 2016년 7월 인출.(Yonhap News (2014). Math education is like this! Advice from the Fields Winners. It will be withdrawn in July 2016 at http://www.yonhapnews.co.kr/.)
6 우정호 (2000). 수학 학습 지도 원리와 방법. 서울대학교출판부.(Woo, J. H. (2000). Principles and methods of mathematics instruction. Seoul National University Press.)
7 정문성 (2013) 토의.토론수업방법 56. 서울: 교육과학사.(Jung, M. S. (2013) Discussion and discussion method 56. Seoul: History of Education Science.)
8 한국교육개발원 (1992). 교육의 본질 추구를 위한 수학교육 평가 체제 연구(II)-수학과 평가도구 개발. 한국교육개발원.(K.E.D.I.(1992). A Study on Evaluation System of Mathematics Education for Pursuit of the Essence of Education (II) - Development of Mathematics Assessment Tool. K.E.D.I.)
9 Suzanne H. Chapin, Catherine O'Connor, Nancy Canavan Anderson(2013). Classroom Discussions in Math, Grades K-6, Third Edition: Scholastic Inc.
10 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evalyation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA : The Auther.