Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7468/jksmec.2017.20.1.85

The Sociodynamical Function of Meta-affect in Mathematical Problem-Solving Procedure  

Do, Joowon (Seoul Banghyun Elementary School)
Paik, Suckyoon (Department of Mathematics Education, Seoul National University of Education)
Publication Information
Education of Primary School Mathematics / v.20, no.1, 2017 , pp. 85-99 More about this Journal
Abstract
In order to improve mathematical problem-solving ability, there has been a need for research on practical application of meta-affect which is found to play an important role in problem-solving procedure. In this study, we analyzed the characteristics of the sociodynamical aspects of the meta-affective factor of the successful problem-solving procedure of small groups in the context of collaboration, which is known that it overcomes difficulties in research methods for meta-affect and activates positive meta-affect, and works effectively in actual problem-solving activities. For this purpose, meta-functional type of meta-affect and transact elements of collaboration were identified as the criterion for analysis. This study grasps the characteristics about sociodynamical function of meta-affect that results in successful problem solving by observing and analyzing the case of the transact structure associated with the meta-functional type of meta-affect appearing in actual episode unit of the collaborative mathematical problem-solving activity of elementary school students. The results of this study suggest that it provides practical implications for the implementation of teaching and learning methods of successful mathematical problem solving in the aspect of affective-sociodynamics.
Keywords
mathematical problem solving; meta-affect; meta-functional type of meta-affect; sociodynamical function;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Goldin, G. A. (2002). Affect, meta-affect, and mathematical belief structures. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Torner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 59-72). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
2 Goldin, G. A. (2009). The affective domain and students' mathematical inventiveness. In R. Leikin, A. Berman, & B. Koichu (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 181-194). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
3 Goldin, G. A. (2014). Perspectives on emotion in mathematical engagement, learning, and problem solving. In R. Pekrun and L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International Handbook of Emotions in Education (pp. 391-414). New York : Routledge.
4 Gomez-Chacon, I. M. (2000). Affective influence in the knowledge of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43, 149-168.   DOI
5 Goos, M. (1995). Metacognitive knowledge, belief and classroom mathematics. In B. Atweh & S. Flavel (Eds.), Galtha(Proceedings of the 18th annual conference of the mathematics education research group of australasia) (pp.300-306). Darwin: MERGA.
6 Goos, M. & Galbraith, P. (1996). Do it this way! Metaconitive strategies in collaborative mathematical problem solving. Educational studies in mathematics, 30(3), 229-260.   DOI
7 Goos, M., Galbraith, P. & Renshaw, P. (2002). Socially mediated metacognition: Creating collaborative zones of proximal development in smallgroup problem solving. Educational studies in mathematics, 49(2), 193-223.   DOI
8 Gottman, J. M., Katz, L. F., & Hooven, C. (1996). Parental meta-emotion philosophy and the emotional life of families: Theoretical models and preliminary data. Journal of Family Psychology, 10(3), 243-268.   DOI
9 Hannula, M. (2001). The metalevel of cognitionemotion interaction. In M. Ahtee, O. Bjorkqvist, E. Pehkonen & Vatanen (Eds.), Research on mathematics and science education: From beliefs to cognition, from problem solving to understanding (pp. 55-65). Jyvaskyla: University of Jyvaskyla printing house.
10 Hannula, M., Evans, J., Philippou, G., & Zan, R., (2004). Affect in mathematics education - exploring theoretical frameworks. Proceedings of the 28th conference of the international Group for the psychology of mathematics education, 1, 107-136.
11 Lai, E. R. (2011). Collaboration: a literature review. research report. Retrieved from http://www.pearsonassessments.com/research.
12 Malmivuori, M. L. (2006). Affect and self-regulation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63, 149-164.   DOI
13 Lester, F. K., Garofalo, J., & Kroll, D. L. (1989). Self-confidence, interest, beliefs, and metacognition: Key influences on problemsolving behavior. In D. B. McLeod & V. M. Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective (pp. 75-88). New York: Springer-Verlag.
14 McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 575-596). New York: Macmillan.
15 Malmivuori, M. L. (2001). The dynamics of affect, cognition, and social environment in the regulation of personal learning processes: The case of mathematics. Research Report 172. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.
16 Moscucci, M. (2010). Why is there not enough fuss about affect and meta-affect among mathematics teacher? Proceedings of the CERME-6, 1811-1820.
17 NCTM. (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. VA: NCTM.
18 Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. New York: Academic Press.
19 Schoenfeld, A. H. (1989). Ideas in the air: Speculations on small group learning, environmental and cultural influences on cognition, and epistemology. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 71-88.   DOI
20 Schoenfeld, A. H.(1999). Looking toward the 21't century: Challenges of educational theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 4-14.   DOI
21 Schloglmann, W. (2005). Meta-affect and strategies in mathematics learning. Proceeding of CERME-4. 275-284.
22 도주원.백석윤 (2016). 수학 문제해결에서 메타정의의 기능. 한국초등수학교육학회, 20(4), 563-581.(Do, J. & Paik, S. (2016). The function of meta-affect in mathematical problem solving. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 20(4), 563-581.)
23 Silver, E. A. (1987). Foundations of cognitive theory and research for mathematics problem-solving instruction. In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education (pp. 33-60). NJ: Hillsdale.
24 Yackel, E., Cobb, P., & Wood, T. (1991). Small-group Interactions as a source of learning opportunities in second-grade mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(5), 390-408.   DOI
25 강완.김상미.박만구.백석윤.오영열 (2009). 초등수학교육. 서울: 경문사.(Kang, W., Kim, S., Park, M., Paik, S., & Oh, Y. (2009). Elementary mathematics education. Seoul: Kyungmunsa.)
26 김선희.김부미.이종희 (2014). 수학교육과 정의적 영역. 서울: 경문사.(Kim, S., Kim, B., & Lee, J. (2014). Mathematics education and Affective domain. Seoul: Kyungmunsa.)
27 김선희.박정언 (2011). 수학 학습에서의 메타-정의유형 탐색. 학교수학, 13(3), 469-484.(Kim, S. & Park, J. (2011). Explorating meta-affect types in mathematical learning. Journal of korea Society of Educational Studies in Mathematics School Mathematics, 13(3), 469-484.)
28 백석윤 (1994). 메타인지적 문제해결력의 지도를 위한 메타문제 유형의 개발. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈A <수학교육>, 33(2), 177-188.(Paik, S. (1994). Development of meta-problem type for guidance of meta-cognitive problem solving ability. Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education Series A, 33(2), 177-188.)
29 백석윤 (2016). 수학 문제해결 교육. 서울: 경문사.(Paik, S. (2016). Mathematical problem solving education. Seoul: Kyungmunsa.)
30 이종희.김선희 (2002). 수학적 의사소통. 서울: 교우사.(Lee, J. & Kim, S. (2002). Mathematical communication. Seoul: Gyowoosa.)
31 Carlson, M. P. & Bloom, I. (2005). The cyclic nature of problem solving: An emergent multidimensional problem-solving framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(1), 45-75.   DOI
32 Beals, L. (2006). Dyadic collaborative problem solving on engineering tasks in a first grade classroom. Master thesis, Tufts University, Medford.
33 Bowen, B. A. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note. Retrieved from http://qrj.sagepub.com.
34 Brendefur, J. & Frykholm, J. (2000). Prompting mathematical communication in the classroom: two preservice teachers' conceptions and practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3, 125-153.   DOI
35 Chalmers, C. (2009). Group metacognition during mathemaitcal problem solving. In R. Hunter, B. Bicknell, & T. Burgess (Eds.), Crossing divides: Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia 1. Palmerston North. NZ: MERGA.
36 Conti, G., & Fellenz, R. (1991). Assessing adult learning strategies. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Adult Education Research Conference, 2-27.
37 Damon, W. & Phelps, E. (1989). Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education. International journal of educational research 13, 9-19.   DOI
38 DeBellis, V. A., & Goldin, G. A. (1997). The affective domain in mathematical problem-solving. In: E. Pekhonen (Ed.), Proceedings of the PME 21 2, 209-216.
39 DeBellis, V. A., & Goldin, G. A. (2006). Affect and meta-affect in mathematical problem solving: A representational perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 131-147.   DOI
40 Fawcett, L. M. & Garton, A. F. (2005). The effct of peer collaboration on children's problem-solving ability. British Journal of Education Psychology, 75, 157-169.   DOI