1 |
Thomson, P. (1994). The development of the concept of speed and its' relation to concept of rate. In G. Herel & J. Confrey(Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics(pp. 178-234). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
|
2 |
교육과학기술부 (2011). 초등학교 수학 5-2 교사용 지도서. 서울: 두산동아(주)(Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2011). Mathematics teachers' guide 5-2. Seoul: Dong-A Publishing Co.)
|
3 |
교육과학기술부 (2012). 초등학교 과학 5-2 교사용 지도서. 서울:(주)금성출판사.(Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2012). Science teachers' guide 5-2. Seoul: KumSung Publishing Co.)
|
4 |
박희옥.박만구 (2012). 비와 비율 학습에서 나타나는 초등학교 학생들의 인식론적 장애 분석. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 C <초등수학교육>, 15(2), 159-170.(Park. H. O., & Park, M. G. (2012). An analysis on the epistemological obstacles of elementary students in the learning of ratio and rate. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 15(2), 159-170.)
|
5 |
이종희.이진향.김부미 (2003). 중학생들의 유추에 의한 수학적 문제 해결 과정: 사상의 명료화를 중심으로. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 E <수학교육논문집>, 16, 245-267.(Lee, J. H., Lee, J. H., & Kim, B. M. (2003). Middle school students' mathematical problem solving process through analogy. Communications of Mathematical Education, 16, 245-267.)
|
6 |
성창근 (2014). 학습 전이에 있어서 유추 거리와 지식의 영향. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 C <초등수학교육>, 17(1), 1-16.(Sung, C. K. (2014). Influence of analogy distance and mathematical knowledge in transfer of learning. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 17(1), 1-16)
|
7 |
장혜원 (2002). 초등학교 수학에서 비의 값과 비율 개념의 구별에 관한 논의. 학교수학, 4(4), 633-642.(Chang, H. W. (2002). A Discussion on the distinction between 'The value of ration' and 'The rate' in elementary school mathematics. School Mathematics, 4(4), 633-642.)
|
8 |
정영옥 (2005). 초등학교에서 비와 비례식 지도에 대한 고찰-한국, 미국, 일본, 중국을 중심으로. 과학교육논총, 18, 13-28.(Chong, Y. O. (2005). On the reflection of teaching ratio and proportionality in the primary school. Science Education Publications, 18. 13-28.)
|
9 |
정은실 (2003). 비 개념에 대한 역사적, 수학적, 심리적 분석. 학교수학, 13(3), 247-265.(Chung, E, S. (2003). A Historical, mathematical, psychological analysis on ratio concept. School Mathematics, 5(4), 421-440.)
|
10 |
Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 612-637.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Bassok, M. (1997). Two types of reliance on correlation between content and structure in reasoning about word problem. In L. D. English(Ed.), Mathematical reasoning: Analogies, metaphors, and images (pp. 221-246). Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
|
12 |
Bassok, M., & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Inter-domain transfer between isomorphic topic in algebra and physics. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition, 15(1). 153-166.
DOI
|
13 |
Bassok, M., & Olseth, K. L. (1995). Object-based representations: Transfer between cases of continuous and discrete models of change. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(6), 354-367.
|
14 |
Doerr, H., & English, L. (2003). A Modelling perspective on students' mathematical reasoning about data. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 34(2), 110-136.
DOI
|
15 |
Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1-38
DOI
|
16 |
English, L. D. (1997). Children's reasoning process in classifying and solving computational word problem. In L. D. English(Ed.), Mathematical reasoning: Analogies, metaphors, and images (pp. 191-220). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
|
17 |
Fruedenthal, H. (1983). Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structure. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
|
18 |
Gay, L. R. (1996). Educational Research: Competencies for analysis and application. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: A Simon & Schuster Company.
|
19 |
Holyoak, K. J., & Koh, K. (1987). Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer. Memory & Cognition, 15(4), 332-340.
DOI
|
20 |
Lesh, R., & Sriramna, B. (2005). Mathematics Education as a design science. International Reviews on Mathematical Education, 37(6), 490-505.
|
21 |
Lobato, J. (2006). Alternative perspective on the transfer of learning: History, issue, and challenge for future research. The Journal of Learning Science, 15(4), 431-449.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Rebello, N. S., Zollman, D. A., Allbaugh, A. R., Engelhardt, P. V., Gray, K. E., Hrepic, Z., et al. (2005). Dynamic transfer: A perspective from physics education research. In J. P. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from modern multidisciplinary perspective. Greenwich, CT:Information Age Publication Inc.
|
23 |
Reed, S. K. (1999). Word problems: Research and curriculum reform. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
|