1 |
나장함 (2006). 질적 연구의 다양한 타당성에 대한 비교 분석 연구. 교육평가연구, 19(1), 265-283.(Na, J. H. (2006). A comparative analysis of validity issues in qualitative research. Journal of Education Evaluation, 19(1), 265-283.)
|
2 |
나장함.김진호 (2016). 초등 수학교육 관련 혼합 연구에서 적용된 질적 연구 방법에 대한 분석. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 C <초등수학교육>, 19(1), 47-60.(Na, J. H. & Kim, J. H. (2016). Qualitative analysis on mixed research in the field of mathematics for elementary students. Journal of Korea Society of Mathematics Education Series C , 19(1), 47-60.)
|
3 |
박상완 (2014). 현직교사교육 연구 동향 분석: 특징과 과제. 한국교원교육연구, 31(2), 227-254.(Park, S. W. (2014). A study on the research trends of in-service teacher education in korea: Implications and tasks. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 31(2), 227-254.)
|
4 |
박선형 (2010). 교육행정학의 혼합방법연구 활성화를 위한 예비적 논의. 교육행정학연구, 28(2), 27-54.(Park, S. H. (2010). Exploring theoretical issues of the development of mixed methods research in educational administration. The Journal of Educational Administration, 28(2), 27-54.)
|
5 |
이원석 (2011). 혼합 연구방법에서의 패러다임(paradigm)의 혼합. 교육문제연구, 39, 195-211.(Lee, W. S. (2011). Mixing paradigms in mixed methods. The Journal of Research in Education, 39, 195-211.)
|
6 |
임성재.임재훈 (2015). 초등수학영재학급에서 교수자의 지도 목표와 학습자의 학습 목표 인식 간극 분석. 한국초등수학교육학회, 19(1), 1-16.(Lim, S. J. & L. J. H. (2015). Analysis on the perception discrepancy between teacher's teaching goal and students' learning goal in the elementary school mathematics class for the gifted. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 19(1), 1-16.)
|
7 |
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act(2d ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.
|
8 |
Eisner, E. W. (1976). Educational connoisseurship and criticism. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 10(3/4), 135-150.
DOI
|
9 |
Flinders, D. J., & Eisner, E. W. (1994). Educational criticism as form of qualitative inquiry. Research in the Teaching of English, 28(4), 341-357.
|
10 |
Milles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
|
11 |
Onwuegbuzie, A. J. & Leech, N. L.(2007). A call for qualitative power analysis. Quality and Quantity, 41, 105-121.
DOI
|
12 |
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods(4th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
|
13 |
김동중.배성철.김원.이다희.최상호 (2014). 수학교육연구 및 혼합 연구방법 동향: 최근 10년간 발표된 국내 학술지 논문을 중심으로. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 E <수학교육 논문집>, 28(3), 303-320.(Kim, D. J., Bae, S. C., Kim, W., Lee, D., & Choi, S. H. (2014). Trends of mathematics education research and mixed methods focusing on domestic mathematics education journals for the last 10 years. Journal of Korea Society of Mathematics Education Series E , 28(3), 303-320.)
|
14 |
권경인.양정연 (2014). 상담 분야 혼합연구 동향분석. 교육연구논총, 35(1), 103-124.(Kwon, K. I. & Yang, J. Y. (2014). Trends in mixed methods research in counseling. CUN Journal of Educational Studies, 35(1), 103-124.)
|