1 |
권경인.양정연 (2014). 상담 분야 혼합연구 동향분석. 교육연구논총 35(1), 103-124.(Kwon, K. & Yang, J. (2014). Trends in mixed methods research in counseling. CNU Journal of Educational Studies 35(1), 103-124.)
|
2 |
김동중.배성철.김원.이다희.최상호 (2014). 수학교육연구 및 혼합 연구방법 동향: 최근 10년간 발표된 국내 학술지 논문을 중심으로. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 E <수학교육 논문집> 28(3), 303-320.(Kim, D., Bae, S., Kim, S., Lee, S., & Choi, S. (2014). Trends of mathematics education research and mixed methods - Focusing on domestic mathematics Education Journals for the last 10 years. Communications of Mathematical Education 28(3), 303-320.)
|
3 |
나장함 (2006). 질적 연구의 다양한 타당성에 대한 비교 분석 연구. 교육평가연구 19(1), 265-283.(Na, J. (2006). A comparison analysis of validity issues in qualitative research. Journal of Education Evaluation 19(1), 265-283.)
|
4 |
박상완 (2014). 현직교사교육 연구 동향 분석: 특징과 과제. 한국교원교육연구 31(2), 227-254.(Park, S. (2014). A study on the research trends of in-service teacher education in Korea: Implications and tasks. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education 31(2), 227-254.)
|
5 |
박선형 (2010). 교육행정학의 혼합방법연구 활성화를 위한 예비적 논의. 교육행정학연구 28(2), 27-54.(Park, S. (2010). Exploring theoretical issues of the development of mixed methods research in educational adminstration. The Journal of Educational Administration 28(2), 27-54.)
|
6 |
성용구 (2013). 혼합연구 설계의 타당성을 높이기 위한 단계별 전략. 열린교육연구 21(3), 129-151.(Sung, Y. (2013). The strategies for raising the validity of mixed method research design. The Journal of Yeolin Education 21(3), 129-151.)
|
7 |
이원석 (2011). 혼합 연구방법에서의 패러다임(paradigm)의 혼합. 교육문제연구 39, 195-211.(Lee, W. (2011). Mixing paradigms in mixed methods. The Journal of Research in Education 39, 195-211.)
|
8 |
Depaepe, F., De Corte, E. & Verschaffel, L. (2010). Teacher's approaches towards word problem solving: Elaborating or restricting the problem context. Teaching and Teacher Education 26(2), 152-160.
DOI
|
9 |
Maxwell, J. (1992) Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review 62, 279-300.
DOI
|
10 |
Milles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
|
11 |
Mousoulides, N. G., Christou, C., & Sriraman, B. (2008). A modeling perspective on the teaching and learning of mathematical problem solving. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 10(3), 293-304.
DOI
|
12 |
Onwuegbuzie, A. J. & Leech, N. L. (2007). A call for qualitative power analysis. Quality and Quantity 41, 105-121.
DOI
|
13 |
Palm, T. (2007). Impact of authenticity on sense making in word problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics 67(1), 37-58.
DOI
|
14 |
Patton, M. G. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3nd Ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
|
15 |
Patton, M. G. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th Ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
|
16 |
Shapiro, E. (1973). Educational evaluation: Rethinking the criteria of competence. School Review 81, 523-549.
DOI
|
17 |
Verschaffel, L. ; Greer, B. & De Corte, E. (2002). Everyday knowledge and mathematical modeling of school word problems. In K. Gravemeijer, R. Lehrer, B. van Oers, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Symbolizing, modeling and tools use in mathematics education (pp. 257-276). Dordrecht, Netherlands; Kluwer Academic Publishers.
|