Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7468/jksmec.2013.16.3.211

Case Studies for Consulting of Elementary Mathematics teaching based on Flanders's Interaction Analysis Category System  

Kim, Soo Mi (Gyeongin National University of Education)
Kim, Mi Hwan (Samsung Elementary school)
Publication Information
Education of Primary School Mathematics / v.16, no.3, 2013 , pp. 211-227 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study is designed to help pre-service teachers to improve their teaching skills in elementary math class. For this, the consulting program with 5-steps was planned and applied to three elementary pre-service teachers. Each class the teachers performed was analyzed by both Flanders's Interaction Analysis Category System and participant observation. As results of consulting, the common characteristics of three pre-service teachers are shown. Firstly their teaching style is non directive, but they fail to induce their students spontaneously respond. They often ignore or don't use their students' respond they think incorrect to develop the next ideas. Simply saying, their classes are typically teacher-oriented but they are not authoritative. It is proved that consulting program is effective for improving developing non directive teaching skills, but is not much effective decreasing teachers' comment and increasing students' rolls in a math class.
Keywords
Flanders's Interaction analysis category system; Class consulting; elementary mathematics teaching; pre-service teacher;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 교육인적자원부 (2011). 수학과 교육과정. 교육과학기술부 고시. 제 2011-361호 [별책8]. Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development (2008). Mathematics curriculum. Declaration of Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. 2011-361 [An extra issue 8]
2 구순란 (2000). 우리나라 초등학교 수학교실에서 이루어지는 교사의 발문 분석. 경인교육대학교 석사학위 논문. Gu, S. R. (2000). An analysis on teacher's questioning in mathematics class in an elementary school. Master's thesis of Gyeongin National University.
3 김미환 (2011). Flanders 언어상호작용분석 프로그램을 이용한 초등 수학영재 수업에서의 교사발언 사례 분석. 경인교육대학교 석사학위논문. Kim, M. H. (2011). Analysis on teacher's discourse in math gifted class in elementary schools using Flanders interaction analysis program. Master's thesis of Gyeongin National University.
4 김정현 (2003). 초등학교 수학수업에서 이루어지는 교사의 발문 분석. 청주교육대학교 석사학위 논문. Kim, J. H. (2003). A study on teachers' questions in elementary mathematics classroom. Master's thesis of ChungJu National University of Education.
5 류희수.여태철 (2008). 수업컨설팅 이렇게 하라. 학교컨설팅 총서1. 교육과학사. Ryu, H. S. & Yeo, T. C. (2008). Do consulting for teaching like this. School consulting1. Education science company.
6 백제은.김경현 (2010). 초등학교 우수수업의 플랜더즈 언어상호작용 유형 분석. 교육혁신연구. 20(1) Baek, J. E. & Kim, K. H. (2010). Analysis of Flanders verbal interaction type on excellent classes in elementary school. Journal of Educational Innovation Research. 20(1)
7 변영계.김경현 (2005). 수업장학과 수업분석. 서울:학지사. Beyn, Y. G. & Kim, K. H. (2010). Class inspection and calss analysis. Seoul : Hakjisa.
8 신준식 (2007). 수학수업에서 의사소통 분석-언어상호작용을 중심으로-. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 C<초등수학교육>, 10(1), 15-28. Shin, J. S. (2007). An analysis on Communication in a math class-based on verbal interactions. Journal of Korea Society in Mathematics Education series C. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 10(1). 15-28   과학기술학회마을
9 우정호 (2005). 수학학습-지도 원리와 방법. 서울: 서울대학교출판부. Woo, J. H. (2005). Mathematics learning-teaching principles and methods. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.
10 조남두 외 7인(2011). 수업을 꿰뚫어 보는 힘! 상상채널. Jo, N. D. et al. (2011). The power seeing through class! Imagination channel.
11 주삼환(2009). 수업관찰분석과 수업연구. 서울: 한국학술정보 Joo, S. H. (2009). Class observation analysis and class research. seoul : Korea Research Information.
12 Flanders, N. (1970). Analyzing teaching behavior. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
13 Meyer, H. 손승남, 정창호 역 (2011). 좋은 수업이란 무엇인가? (Was ist guter Unterricht?). 서울: 삼우반. Meyer, H. translated by Son, S. N., Jeong, C. H. (2011). What is good teaching? (Was ist guter Unterricht?). Seoul : Samwooban.
14 Polya, G. 우정호 역 (2002). 어떻게 문제를 풀 것인가? :수학적 사고 방법(How to solve it). 서울: 교우사. Polya, G. translated by Woo, J. H. (2002). How to solve it? : Mathematical thinking method(How to solve it). Seoul : Gyowoosa.