1 |
고정화.도종훈.송미영 (2008a). 수학과 국가수준학업성취도 평가에서의 성별 차이 분석. 수학교육학연구, 18(2), 179-200.
|
2 |
고정화.도종훈.이학렬.조지민.김명화.최인봉.송미영.김수진 (2007). 2006년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 연구-수학-. 한국교육과정평가원 연구보고 RRE 2007-3-4.
|
3 |
고정화.서보억.이학렬.양길석.송미영.최인봉.김희경.유진은 (2008b). 2007년 국가수준 학업 성취도 평가 연구- 수학-. 한국교육과정평가원 연구 보고 RRE 2008-5-3.
|
4 |
권오남 (2000). 양성평등을 위한 수학교육의 과제와 전망. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 E <수학교육논문집>, 10, 417-440.
|
5 |
권오남.박경미.임형.허라금 (1996). 공간능력에서의 성별차이에 관한 연구. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 A <수학교육>, 35(2), 125-141.
|
6 |
권점례.이창훈.정은영.고은성.김보경 (2010). 2009년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 연구-수학-. 한국교육과정평가원 연구보고 RRE 2010-6-4.
|
7 |
김선희.고정화.조영미.구자형.이양락.조지민.송미영.시기자.김수진 (2005). 2004년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 연구- 수학-. 한국교육과정평가원 연구보고 RRE 2005-1-4.
|
8 |
김선희.권점례.고정화.김경리.조지민.박정.김수진 (2006). 2005년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 연구- 수학-. 한국교육과정평가원 연구보고 RRE 2006-1-3.
|
9 |
서보억.권영인 (2008). 개인차를 고려한 중학교 기하 교수-학습 방법 개발. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 A <수학교육>, 47(2), 113-132.
|
10 |
신성균.강문봉.황혜정 (1993). 수학과 문제해결력 신장을 위한 교수-학습 자료 개발 연구. 한국교육개발원 연구보고 RRE 93-13.
|
11 |
이봉주 (2009). 수학 학업성취도의 변산도에서 성차 추이 분석. 수학교육학연구, 19(2), 273-288.
|
12 |
이봉주.권점례.최익준.정은영.최인봉.김희경.김소영.유진은 (2009). 2008년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 연구- 수학-. 한국교육과정평가원 연구보고 RRE 2009-9-3.
|
13 |
이봉주.조윤동.김미경.김보경 (2011). 2010년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 연구-수학-. 한국교육과정평가원 연구보고 RRE 2011-3-4.
|
14 |
정경아.정해숙.권오남 (2004). 중등학생의 수학에서의 성별 격차 및 해소방안 연구. 한국여성개발원 연구보고서.
|
15 |
Albert, D., & Steiner, C. M. (2005). Representing domain knowledge by concept maps: How to validate them? In T. Okamoto, D. Albert, T. Honda & F. W. Hesse(Eds.), The 2nd joint workshop af cognition and learning through media-communication for advanced e-learning (pp. 169-174). JWCL: Tokyo.
|
16 |
Battista, M. T. (1990). Spatial visualization and gender difference in high school geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 47-60.
DOI
|
17 |
Becker, B. J. (1990). ltem characteristics and gender differences on the SAT-M for mathematically able youths. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 65-87.
DOI
|
18 |
Engelhard, G. (1990). Gender differences in performance on mathematics items: Evidence from the United States and Thailand. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15(1), 13-36.
DOI
|
19 |
Brandon, P. R., Newton, B. J., & Hammond, O. (1987). Children's mathematics achievement in Hawaii: Sex differences favoring girls. American Educational Research Journal, 24(3), 437-461.
DOI
|
20 |
Fennema, E. (1974). Mathematics learning and the sexes: A review. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 5(2), 126-139.
DOI
|
21 |
Fennema, E., & Carpenter, T. (1981). The second national assessment and sex-related differences in mathematics. Mathematics Teacher, 74, 554-559.
|
22 |
Geary, D. C., Saults, S. J., Liu, F., & Hoard, M. K. (2000). Sex differences in spatial cognition, computational fluency, and arithmetical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77(4), 337-353 .
DOI
|
23 |
Goodchild, S., & Grevholm, B. (2007). An exploratoIy study of mathematics test results: What is the gender effect? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(1), 161-182.
|
24 |
Hao, J. X., & Kwok, R. C. (2007). Predicting problem-solving performance using concept map. In Proceedings of the 11th Pacific Asia Conference on information Systems. Retrieved January 30, 2012, from http://www.pacis-net.org/file/2007/1242.pdf
|
25 |
Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 139-155.
DOI
|
26 |
Isiksal, M., & Cakiroglu, E. (2008). Gender differences regarding mathematics achievement: The Case of Turkish Middle School Students. School science and mathematics, 108(3), 113-120.
DOI
|
27 |
Kyriakides, L. (2002). A research based model for the development of policy on baseline assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 28(6), 805-826.
DOI
|
28 |
Kyriakides, L. (2005). Extending the comprehensive model of educational effectiveness by an empirical investigation. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16(2), 103-152.
DOI
|
29 |
Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it?: A new aspect af mathematical method. N.Y.: Doubleday & Company. 우정호 역(1997), 어떻게 문제를 풀 것인가? 서울; 천재교육.
|
30 |
Neuville, E., & Croizet, J. (2007). Can salience ogender identity impair math performance among 7-8 years old girls? The moderating role of task difficulty. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(3), 307-316.
DOI
|
31 |
Primo, M. R, & Shavelson, R. J. (1996). Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 3(6), 569-600.
|
32 |
Reis, S, M., & Park, S. (2001). Gender differences in high-achieving students in math and science. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 25(1), 52-73.
DOI
|
33 |
Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2000). on the use of concept maps as an assessment tool in science: What we have learned so far. Retrieved January 31, 2012, from http://redie.uabc.mx/vol2nol/contents-ruizpri.html.
|
34 |
Schmitau, J. (2004). Uses of concept mapping in teacher education in mathematics. In Proceedings of the 1st International. Conference on Concept Mapping Systems. Retrieved January 31, 2012, from http://cmc.ihmc.us/papers/cmc2004-269.pdf.
|
35 |
Schuster, P. M. (2008). Concept mapping: A critial thinking approach to care planning. MA: David Company.
|
36 |
Tao, Terence. (2006). Solving mathematical problems: A personal perspective, first edition. London: Oxford University Press.
|
37 |
Zeitz, P. (1999). The art and craft of problem solving. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
|