Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7468/jksmec.2011.14.1.001

A Study on the Direction of Mathematics Education according to the Perspective of the Classroom Ecology  

Lee, Dae-Hyun (Department of Mathematics Education, Gwangju National University of Education)
Publication Information
Education of Primary School Mathematics / v.14, no.1, 2011 , pp. 1-12 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper provides an outline of mathematics education based on the classroom ecology. Ecology is the subject that concentrates on the relations of human and environment. As mathematics education consists of many factors, it is natural that mathematics education should be interest in the perspective of ecology. This paper examines the meaning of ecology and classroom ecology of mathematics education in the perspective of ecology. And it provides the directions of ecological mathematics education. In special, I set the frame of mathematics classroom in the perspective of ecology. The ecological structure divides microsystem(teacher, student, content), mesosysten(relations of microsystems), exosystem(school), and macrosystem(the objects of mathematics education). Lastly, I suggest the ways of mathematical learning and research of classroom ecology in mathematics education. For we should focus the improvement of students' mathematical ability, we must search for the various teaching and learning methods and the ares of research in the perspective of ecology classroom. Therefore, we should be interested in the classroom environments as well as teaching methods, contents based on the ecology classroom in mathematics education.
Keywords
classroom ecology; perspective of classroom ecology; context; the ecological frame; the ecological environmen;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 최수아 (2008). Mental Map에 드러난 아동들의 생활세계 이해. 한국교원대학교 석사학위논문.
2 한국과학창의재단 (2009). 창의중심의 미래형 수학과 교육과정 모형 연구. 한국과학창의재단.
3 Baine, D., Puhan, B., Puhan, G., & Puhan, S. (2000). An ecological inventory approach to developing curricula for rural areas of developing countries. International Review of Education, 46(1/2), 49-66.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Barab, S. A., & Roth, W. (2006). Curriculum -based ecosystems: Supporting knowing from an ecological perspective. Educational Researcher, 35(5), 3-13.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. MA: Harvard University Press. 이영 (역)(1995). 인간발달 생태학. 서울: 교육과학사.
6 Bruhn, J. B. (1974). Human ecology: A unifying science? Human Ecology, 2(2), 105-125.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Capra, F. (1996). The web of life. New York: Brockman, Inc. 김용정․김동광 (역)(1998). 생명의 그물. 범양사출판부.
8 김윤옥 (2005). 생태학적 국어교육: 듣기.말하기 교육을 중심으로. 청람어문교육, 31, 33-51.
9 김정아 (2005). 장소중심 지리교육내용 구성 원리의 탐색. 한국교원대학교 석사학위논문.
10 김종석, 김정겸 (2002). 구성주의 수업에 있어서 학습 양식이 학습효과에 미치는 영향. 敎育發展論叢, 23, 89-110.
11 김혜숙 (2006). 사회과 교실수업연구를 위한 교실생태학의 가능성 탐색. 사회과 교육, 45(2), 25-48.
12 남상준 (2009). 초등 사회과 수업에서의 '활동'의 생태적 접근성. 사회과학교육연구, 10, 45-66.
13 노상우 (2003). 생태적 담론의 교육학적 함의-새로운 생태교육관의 모색-. 교육학연구, 41(1), 1-21.
14 노상우 (2007). 생태주의에서 본 현대교육학의 세 가지 과제. 교육철학, 39, 57-79.
15 박인기 (2003). 생태학적 국어교육의 현실과 지향. 한국초등국어교육학회 학술대회 자료집, 1-34.
16 박인기 (2009). 교과의 생태와 교과의 진화: 교과의 개념에 대한 패러다임 변화와 국어교과의 진화조건. 국어교육학연구, 34, 309-343.
17 백순근 (2002). 학습에 대한 생태학적 접근이 교육평가에 주는 시사. 아시아교육연구, 3(1), 27-42.
18 Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Socio mathematical morms, argumentation, and autonomyin mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458-477.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 교육인적자원부 (2007). 수학과 교육과정. 서울: 교육인적자원부.
20 Wertheimer, M. (1945). Productive thinking. New York: Harper & Brothers published. 矢田部達郞 (譯) (1952). 生産的思考. 岩波現代叢書
21 NCTM (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
22 Catton, W. R. (1994). Foundations of human ecology. Sociological Perspective, 37(1), 75-95.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Cobb, P., Perlwitz, M., & Underwood, D. (1996). Constructivism and activity theory: A consideration of their similarities and differences as they relate to mathematics education. In H. Mansfield, N. A. Pateman, & N. Bednarz(Eds.), Mathematics for tomorrow's young children(pp. 10-58). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
24 Cobb, P., Bauersfeld, H. (1995). Introduction: The coordination of psychological and sociological perspectives in mathematics education. In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld, The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures(pp. 1-16). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbam Associates, Publishers.
25 Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education-china lectures-. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
26 NCTM (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: The Author
27 Niss, M., Blum, W., & Galbraith, P. (2007). Introduction. In W. Blum, P. Galbraith, H. Henn, & M. Niss(Eds.). Modeling and applications in mathematics education(pp. 3-32). New York: Springer.
28 Patel, S. (1997). Ecology and Development. Economic and Political Weekly, 32, 20-26.
29 Roth, W. (1996). Where is the context in contextual word problem?: Mathematical practices and products in grade 8 students' answers to story problems. Cognition and Instruction, 14(4), 487-527.   DOI
30 양재영․남상준 (2008). 교실 친화적 사회과 수업의 방향 모색. 교원교육, 24(1), 71-87.
31 유영만 (2005). 지식생태학과 교육공학: 생태학적 교육공학의 정초마련을 위한 시론적 탐색. 교육공학연구, 21(1), 159-194.
32 이도원 (2002). 생태학에서 부분과 전체. 과학사상, 봄호, 58-73.
33 임채균 (2004). 홀리스틱 교육육에 의한 초등 사회과 환경교육 방안-경남 함양군 마천면을 사례로-. 한국교원대학교 석사학위논문.