1 |
Kellogg, M., Rauch, S., Leathers, R., Simpson, M. A., Lines, D., Bickel, L., & Elmore, J. (2015, April). Construction of a dynamic item generator for K-12 mathematics. In National Council on Measurement in Education Conference, Chicago, IL..
|
2 |
Kim, C. H., Kim, B. Y., Moon, S. B., Kim, I. K., Kim, J. S., Park, J. H., Park, H. J., Lee, K. H., & Chae, J. E. (2015). A study on the development of educational indicators and indexes (IV). Korean Educational Development Institute.
|
3 |
Kim, H. R. (2021). New directions of english education course management for pre-service primary teachers in the post corona era. Educational Research, 81, 119-139. http://doi.org/10.17253/swueri.2021.81..006
DOI
|
4 |
Kim, S. H., & Kang, H. Y. (2020). Exploring Ways to Improve Statistics Curriculum by Analyzing Secondary Curriculum in Foreign Countries. School Mathematics, 22(3), 631-650. https://doi.org/ 10.29275/sm.2020.09.22.3.631
DOI
|
5 |
Kim, W., & Lim, W. (2020). Research trends in mathematics teacher learning community: Literature review. Communications of Mathematical Education, 34(4), 439-464. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2020.34.4.439
DOI
|
6 |
Dardick, W., & Choi, J. (2016). Teacher empowered assessment system: Assessment for the 21st century. Journal of Applied Educational and Policy Research, 2(2), 87-98.
|
7 |
Wikiedia (2022). Ontology, Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 23, February. 2022, https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EC%98%A8%ED%86%A8%EB%A1%9C%EC%A7%80
|
8 |
Xinxin, Z. (2019). Using Automatic Item Generation to Create Content for Computerized Formative Assessment [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alberta].
|
9 |
Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004
DOI
|
10 |
Jeong, J. C., Shin, K. A., Lee, S. H., & Yoo, W. H. (2008). Design and implementation of iterative contents based on SCORM in mathematics. Proceeding of the Winter Conference of the Korea Society of Computer and Information, 16, 153-158.
|
11 |
Kang, S. K., & Choi, S. P. (2020). Research on mathematical automatic item generation based on dynamic knowledge-base. Proceeding of the Korean Information Science Society Conference, 302-304.
|
12 |
Kim, H. I., Heo, J. W., & Kim, K. S. (2000). Development of web-based mathematics learning model for self-directed learning. Proceeding of the Korean Information Science Society Conference, 27(1B), 678-680.
|
13 |
Kim, Y., Choi, G., & Noh, T. (2009). High school students' errors in constructing and interpreting science graph. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education, 29(8), 978-989.
|
14 |
LaDuca, A., Staples, W. I., Templeton, B., & Holzman, G. B. (1986). Item modeling procedure for constructing content-equivalent multiple choice questions. Medical education, 20(1), 53-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1986.tb01042.x
DOI
|
15 |
Lee, S. G., Park, K. E., & Ham, Y. M. (2016). A study on 3D printed tactile mathematics textbook for visually impaired students. Communications of Mathematical Education, 30(4), 515-530. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2016.30.4.515-530
DOI
|
16 |
Lee, E. H. (2010). A summary-concept based analysis of the representative values and the measures of dispersion in the 9th grade textbook of Korean middle school [Master Thesis, Ewha Womans University].
|
17 |
Lee, S. M. (2020). Mathematical connection in teaching correlation-Analysis of 2015 Revised Mathematics Curriculum and textbooks- [Master Thesis, Seoul National University].
|
18 |
Lim, H. J. (2017). Study on the design and properties of automatically generated items: focusing on polynomial factorization [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University].
|
19 |
Luecht, R. M. (2012). An introduction to assessment engineering for automatic item generation. In Automatic item generation (pp. 69-86). Routledge.
|
20 |
Ministry of Education (2015). The guide of revision of educational curriculum. Ministry of Education Notice No. 2015-80. Ministry of Education.
|
21 |
Ministry of Education (2018). 2018 Multicultural education support plan. Ministry of Education
|
22 |
Mislevy, R. J., Behrens, J. T., Bennett, R. E., Demark, S. F., Frezzo, D. C., Levy, R., Robinson, D. H., Rutstein, D. W., Shute, V. J., Stanley, K., & Winters, F. I. (2010). On the roles of external knowledge representations in assessment design. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 8(2), 1-56. https://doi.org/10.1037/e643752011-001
DOI
|
23 |
Oh, J. S., Chu, S. W., Cho, W. J., Kim, Y.S., & Lee, J. Y. (2006). A design of dynamic question generation system using Korean wordnet. Journal of Korean Institute of Information Technology, 4(5), 37-44.
|
24 |
Ministry of Education (2022). In order to strengthen digital public education, we will promote teacher competency enhancement and teacher recruitment. https://www.moe.go.kr/boardCnts/viewRenew.do?boardID=72771&lev=0&statusYN=W&s=moe&m=0315&opType=N&boardSeq=92581
|
25 |
Oh, K. S. (2022). A study on the development of reading assessment using automatic item generation -focused on reading comprehension item model-. Journal of CheongRam Korean Language Education, 87, 7-34.
|
26 |
Paik, H. S. (2013). Categorization of middle school students' math learning style preferences and comparison of academic characteristics. School Mathematics, 15(1), 15-35.
|
27 |
Park, K. M. et al., (2015). 2015 Revision mathematics curriculum proposal development study II. Ministry of Education. Research Report of Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity.
|
28 |
Park, J. H. (2017). A study on teaching method for mathematics underachiever through step-by-step learning card-focused on 'number and operations' unit of 9th grade [Master thesis, Korea National University of Education].
|
29 |
Choi, J. H. (2017). Introduction to Assessment Engineering. Assessment, Testing, and Measurement Technical Report Series. The George Washington University.
|
30 |
Choi, J., Kim, H., & Pak, S. (2018). Evaluation of Automatic Item Generation Utilities in Formative Assessment Application for Korean High School Students. Journal of Educational Issues, 4(1), 68-89. https://doi.org/10.5296/jei.v4i1.12630
DOI
|
31 |
Choi, J. H., Kim, S. H., & Yoon, K. I. (2012-2022). CAFA Modeling Manual: Computer Adaptive Formative Assessment User's Guide [System Manual], 2nd edition, CAFA Lab, Inc.
|
32 |
Chu, Y. G. (2014). Approach toward multicultural education and special education as inclusive education. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 16(2), 333-353.
|
33 |
Deane, P., Graf, E. A., Higgins, D., Futagi, Y., & Lawless, R. (2006). Model analysis and model creation: Capturing the task-model structure of quantitative item domains. ETS Research Report Series, 2006(1), I-63. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2006.tb02017.x
DOI
|
34 |
Seo, K. H. (2009). Teacher learning communities and professional development. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 26(2), 243-276.
DOI
|
35 |
Schwinning, N., Schypula, M., Striewe, M., & Goedicke, M. (2014). Concepts and Realizations of Flexible Exercise Design and Feedback Generation in an e-Assessment System for Mathematics. In CICM Workshops (pp. 1-10).
|
36 |
Sinharay, S., & Johnson, M. S. (2012). Statistical modeling of automatically generated items. In Automatic item generation (pp. 193-205). Routledge.
|
37 |
Singley, M. K., & Bennett, R. E. (2002). Item generation and beyond: Applications of schema theory to mathematics assessment. In S. Irvine & P. Kyllonen (Eds.) Item Generating for test development (pp.361-384). Lawrence Erlbaum.
|
38 |
Ala-Mutka, K. (2011). Mapping digital competence: Towards a conceptual understanding. Sevilla: Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, 7-60.
|
39 |
Bejar, I. I., Lawless, R. R., Morley, M. E., Wagner, M. E., Bennett, R. E., & Revuelta, J. (2002). A feasibility study of on-the-fly item generation in adaptive testing. ETS Research Report Series, 2002(2), 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2002.tb01890.x
DOI
|
40 |
Boo, J., & Vispoel, W. (2012). Computer versus paper-and-pencil assessment of educational development: A comparison of psychometric features and examinee preferences. Psychological Reports, 111(2), 443-460. https://doi.org/10.2466/10.03.11.PR0.111.5.443-460
DOI
|
41 |
Wilson, J., Morrison, K., & Embretson, S. E. (2014). Automatic item generator for mathematical achievement items: MathGen3.0. Technical report IES1005A-2014 for Institute of Educational Sciences Grant R305A100234. Cognitive Measurement Laboratory, Georgia Institute of Technology.
|
42 |
Bejar, I. I. (2002). Generative testing: From conception to implementation. In S. H. Irvine & P. C. Kyllonen (Eds.), Item generation for test development (pp.199-217). Erlbaum.
|
43 |
Carroll, S. N. (2021). Fourth grade student experiences in mathematics assessment: Computer versus paper-pencel testing modality. [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Carson-Newman University].
|
44 |
Choi, J. H. (2019). Assessment engineering for learning analytics, Educational Development, 210, 42-45.
|
45 |
Choi, J. H. (2020). Educational innovation in the digital age: A plan to implement an intelligent learning analysis platform based on big data. Educational Development, 214, 44-50.
|
46 |
Choi, J. H., Oh, K. S., Youn, K. I., Lee, D. Y., Joung, J. M., Kim, S. Y., Youm, S. K., Lee, Y. E., Lee, E. J., Park, W. H. K & Lee, S. H. (2022). CAFA Model Example Book, Pubple.
|
47 |
Embretson, S. E., & Kingston, N. M. (2018). Automatic item generation: A more efficient process for developing mathematics achievement items?. Journal of Educational Measurement, 55(1), 112-131. https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12166
DOI
|
48 |
Gierl, M. J., & Haladyna, T. M. (2012). Automatic item generation: Theory and practice. Routledge.
|
49 |
Gierl, M. J., & Lai, H. (2013). Instructional topics in educational measurement (ITEMS) module: Using automated processes to generate test items. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 32(3), 36-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12018
DOI
|
50 |
Fridenfalk, M. (2013). System for automatic generation of examination papers in discrete mathematics. International Association for Development of the Information Society.
|
51 |
Gierl, M. J., Zhou, J., & Alves, C. (2008). Developing a taxonomy of item model types to promote assessment engineering. Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 7(2), 1-51.
|
52 |
Kang, N. R., Lim, D. K., & R, H. A. (2013). Analyzing the styles and types of math learning for middle school students. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 16(2), 363-381.
|
53 |
Holling, H., Bertling, J. P., & Zeuch, N. (2009). Automatic item generation of probability word problems. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 35(2-3), 71-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2009.10.004
DOI
|