Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2011.50.1.001

Insight into an Structural Similarity in Stage of Similar Mathematical Problem Solving Process  

Jun, Young-Bae (Department of Mathematics Education, Gyeongsang National University)
Roh, Eun-Hwan (Department of Mathematics Education, Chinju National University of Education)
Kang, Jeong-Gi (Annam Middle School)
Publication Information
The Mathematical Education / v.50, no.1, 2011 , pp. 1-12 More about this Journal
Abstract
It is the aim of this paper to study the target problem solving process in reference to the base problem. We observed closely how students solve the target problem in reference to the base problem. The students couldn't solve the target problem, although they succeed to find the base problem. This comes from failing to discover the structural similarity between the target problem and the base problem. Especially it is important to cognize the proper corresponding of primary components between the base problem and target problem. And there is sometimes a part component of the target problem equivalent to the base problem and the target problem can't be solved without the insight into this fact. Consequently, finding the base problem fail to reach solving the target problem without the insight into their structural similarity. We have to make efforts to have an insight into the structural similarity between the target problem and the base problem to solve the target problem.
Keywords
mathematical problem solving process; target problem; base problem; insight into an structural similarity;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Silver, E. A. (1981). Recall of Mathematical verbal problem, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 12(1), 54-64.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Smith, L. B. (1989). A model of perceptual classification in children and adults. Psychological Review, 96(1), 125-144.   DOI
3 Lawson, M. J., & Chinnappan, M. (2000). Knowledge connectedness in geometry problem solving, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(1), 26-43.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Medin, D. L., & Ortony, A. (1989). Psychological essentialism. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony(Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning(pp179-195). New York: Cambridge University Press.
5 NCTM (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: The Auther.
6 이종희.이진향.김부미 (2003). 중학생들의 유추에 의한 문제 해결 과정 : 사상의 명료화를 중심으로. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 E <수학교육 논문집>, 17, 115-126.
7 Polya, G. (1997). 어떻게 문제를 풀 것인가? 우정호 역, 서울 : 천재교육 (원저는 1986년 출판)
8 Reed, S. K. (1987). A structure-mapping model for word problem, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13(1), 124-139.   DOI
9 Reed, S. K. (1993). A schema-based theory of transfer. In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction (pp.39-67). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
10 정찬식.노은환 (2009). 수학영재아의 문제해결 과정에 따른 사례 연구-수학적 사고능력을 중심으로-. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 A <수학교육>, 48(4), 455-467.
11 Bassok, M. (1997). Two types of reliance on correlations between content and structure in reasoning about word problems. In L. D. English (Ed.), Mathematical reasoning: Analogies, metaphors, and images (pp.221-246). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12 Chinnappan, M. (1998). Schemas and mental model in geometry problem solving, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36(3), 201-217.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 155-170.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Clfareill, V. (1993). Representation processes in mathematical problem solving. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association Atlanta, Georgia. ED365522.
15 Dooren, W. V., Verschaffel, L., & Onghena, P. (2002). The impact of preservice teachers' content knowledge on their evaluation of students' strategies for solving arithmetic and algebra word problems, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(5), 319-351.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 English, L. D., & Halford, G. S. (2003). 수학교육론. 고상숙.고호경.박만구.이중권.정인철.황우형 역, 서울: 경문사. (원저는 1995년 출판)
17 Gentner, D. (1989). The mechanisms of analogical learning. In S. Vonsniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp.199-241). New York: Cambridge University Press.
18 교육과학기술부 (2007). 초등학교 교육과정 해설(IV): 수학, 과학, 실과, 서울: 교육과학기술부.
19 박현정.이종희 (2006). 중학생들이 수학 문장제 해결 과정에서 구성하는 유사성 분석. 수학교육학연구, 16(2), 115-138.
20 이승우.우정호 (2002). 학교수학에서의 유추와 은유. 수학교육학연구, 12(4), 523-542.
21 이종희.김선희 (2002). 인수분해 문제 해결과 유추. 학교수학, 4(4), 581-599.