1 |
Pudovkin, A. I. and Garfield, E. (2012), Rank normalization of impact factors will resolve Vanclay's dilemma with TRIF, Scientometrics, 92, 409-412.
DOI
|
2 |
Simons, K. (2008), The misused impact factor, Science, 322(5899), 165-165.
DOI
|
3 |
Vanclay, J. K. (2011), Impact Factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification?, Scientometrics, 92, 211-238.
|
4 |
Zhang, Z., Cheng, Y., and Liu, N. C. (2014), Comparison of the effect of mean-based method and z-score for field normalization of citations at the level of Web of Science subject categories, Scientometrics, 101, 1679-1693.
DOI
|
5 |
Zitt, M., Ramanana, S., and Bassecoulard, E. (2005), Relativity of citation performance and excellence measures: From cross-field to cross-scale effects of field-normalisation, Scientometrics, 63(2), 373-401.
DOI
|
6 |
Althouse, B. M., West, J. D., Bergstrom, C. T., and Bergstrom, T. (2009), Differences in impact factor across fields and over time, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 27-34.
DOI
|
7 |
Bornmann, L. and Daniel, H. D. (2008), What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior, Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 45-80.
DOI
|
8 |
Brody, S. (2013), Impact factor: Imperfect but not yet replaceable, Scientometrics, 96, 255-257.
DOI
|
9 |
Chen, J. and Konstan, J. A. (2010), Conference paper selectivity and impact, Communications of the ACM, 53(6), 79-83.
DOI
|
10 |
Dorta-Gonzalez, P. and Dorta-Gonzalez, M. I. (2012), Comparing journals from different fields of science and social science through a JCR subject categories normalized impact factor, Scientometrics, 95(2), 645-672.
DOI
|
11 |
Garfield, E. (1979), Citation indexing-Its theory and application in Science, Technology and Humanities, New York: Wiley and Sons.
|
12 |
Leydesdorff, L. (2012), Alternatives of the journal impact factor I3 and the top-10% of the most highly cited papers, Scientometrics, 92, 355-365.
DOI
|