1 |
Adler, N., Friedman, L., and Sinuany-Stern, Z. (2002), Review of Ranking Methods in the Data Envelopment Analysis Context, European Journal of Operation Research, 140, 249-265
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Lewin, A. Y., and Seiford L. M. (1994), Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software, Kluwer Academic, Boston, United States of America
|
3 |
Cooper, W. W., Seiford L. M., and Tone, K. (2000), Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Application, Kluwer Academic, Boston, United States of America
|
4 |
Sexson, T. R., Silkman, R. H., and Hogan, A. J. (1986), Data Envelopment Analysis: Critique and Extensions, In Measuring Efficiency: An Assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis (Ed.: Silkman, R.H.), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 73-105
|
5 |
Simpson, T. W., Siddique, S., and Jiao, J. Eds. (2005), Product Platform and Product Family Design: Methods and Applications, Springer, New York
|
6 |
Thevenot, H. J., Steva, E. D., Okudan, G. and Simpson, T. W. (2007), A Multi-Attribute Utility Theory-Based Approach to Product Line Selection, Journal of Mechanical Design, 129(11), 1179-1184
DOI
|
7 |
Kota, S., Sethuraman, K. and Miller, R. (2000), A MetricV for Evaluating Design Commonality in Product Families, Journal of Mechanical Design, 122, 403-410
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Paradi, J. C., Smith, S., and Schaffnit-Chatterjee, C. (2002), Knowledge Worker Performance Analysis Using DEA: An Application to Engineering Design Team at Bell Canada, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(1), 161-172
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Dyson, R. G., Allen, R., Camanho, A., Podinovski, V. V., Sarrico, C. S., and Shale. E. A. (2001), Pitfalls and Protocols in DEA, European Journal of Operation Research, 132(2), 245-259
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Thevenot, H. J., Steva, E. D., Okudan, G. E., and Simpson, T. W. (2006), A Multi-Attribute Utility Theory-Based Approach for Product Line Consolidation and Selection, 2006 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Philadelphia, PA, ASME, Paper No. DETC2006-DTM99506
DOI
|
11 |
Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., and Cooper W. W. (1984), Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis, Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Spearman, C. (1904), The Proof and Measurement of Association Between Two Things, American Journal of Psychology, 15, 72-101
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., and Rhodes, E. (1978), Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units, European Journal of Operation Research, 2(6), 429-444
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Farris, J. A., Groesbeck, R. L., Van Aken, E. M., and Letens, G. (2006), Evaluating the Relative Performance of Engineering Design Project: A Case Study Using Data Envelopment Analysis, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53(3): 471-482
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Miyashita, T. and Yamakawa H. (2002), A Study on the Collaborative Design Using Supervisor System, JSME International Journal, 45(1), 333-341
DOI
ScienceOn
|