1 |
Saaty, T. (1977), A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 234-281.
DOI
|
2 |
Brunk, H. (1960), Mathematical models for ranking from comparisons, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 55(291), 503-520.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Kmietowicz, Z. and Pearman, A. (1984), Decision theory, linear partial information and statistical dominance, OMEGA, 12(4), 391-399.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Rardin, R. (1998), Optimization in Operations Research, Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey.
|
5 |
Hadar, J. and Russell, W. (1969), Rules for ordering uncertain prospects, American Economic Review, 59, 25-34.
|
6 |
Law, A. and Kelton, W. (2000), Simulation Modeling and Analysis, MaGraw-Hill.
|
7 |
Kim, D. and Kim, K. (2006), Determining robust ranking from pairwise comparisons, Working paper, POSTECH.
|
8 |
Kim, K., Moskowitz, H., Dhingra, A., and Evans, G. (2000), Fuzzy multicriteria models for quality function deployment, European Journal of Operational Research, 121, 504-518.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Kendall, M. (1955), Further contributions to the theory of paired comparisons, Biometrics, 11, 43-62.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Kim, D. and Kim, K. (2008), Robustness Indices and Robust Prioritization in QFD, Expert Systems With Applications, Accepted for Publication.
|
11 |
Montgomery, D. (1985), Introduction to Statistical Quality Control (2nd ed.), Wiley, Inc., New York.
|
12 |
Xie, M., Tan, K., and Goh, T. (2003), Advanced QFD Applications, Milwaukee, ASQ Press.
|
13 |
Wasserman, G. (1993), On how to prioritize design requirements during the QFD planning process, IIE Transactions, 25 (3), 59-65.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Kim, K., Kim, D., and Min, D. (2007), Robust QFD: framework and a case Study, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 23(1), 31-44.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Montgomery, D. and Runger, G. (2003), Applied Statistical and Probability for Engineers, Wiley.
|
16 |
Cook, W. and Kress, M. (1988), Deriving weights from pairwise comparisons ratio matrices: an axiomatic approach, European Journal of Operational Research, 37, 355-362.
DOI
ScienceOn
|