[KSCI] Korea Science Citation Index Service

Technology Planning-Based Management for the Dissemination of R&D Outcome of Government Supported Research Institutes

Choe, Kyungil (School of Industrial and Management Engineering Hankuk University of Foreign Studies)

Publication Information

Industrial Engineering and Management Systems / v.6, no.1, 2007 , pp. 49-54 More about this Journal

Abstract

This study deals with technology planning-based management for Basic R&D Programs of government supported research institutes (GRIs). The Korean Research Council for Industrial Science and Technology which consists of major GRIs needs to implement new government policies which focus on the dissemination of R&D outcome, collaborative research, and performance-oriented R&D investment. The major characteristics of technology planning-based management include the hierarchy of market-oriented technology plans and the valuation of core technologies. We also suggest technology classifications and project network diagrams.

Keywords

Management of Technology; Technology Planning; Government Supported Research Institute;

Citations & Related Records

Reference

1	Choi, J. C. (2005), A Study on Designing and Implementing the R&D Performance Evaluation System for GRIs Institutional Program as an Engine of Improving R&D Productivity, Policy Study 2004-18, Science & Technology Policy Institute, www.stepi.re.kr.
2	Kostoff, R. and Schaller, R. (2001), Science and Technology Roadmaps, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48, 132-143. DOI ScienceOn
3	Yoon, M. (2004), Strategic Planning Methodology for National R&D Projects of Engineering Technology: Integrated Procedure of TRM and KM, Policy Study 2004-10, Science & Technology Policy Institute, www.stepi.re.kr.
4	KOCI (2005a), The 2004 Institute Evaluation Report, unpublished report, KOCI, www.koci.re.kr.
5	Phaal, R., Farrukh, C. J. P., Mills, J. F., and Probert, D.R. (2003), Customizing the Technology Roadmapping Approach, Proceedings of the Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, Portland, 361-369.
6	Rubenstein, A. H. (2003), Payoffs from Government- Sponsored R&D in the U.S. and Japan, Proceedings of the Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, Portland, 133-139.
7	EIRMA (1997), Technology Roadmapping: Delivering Business Vision, Working Group Report No.52, European Industrial Research Association, www.eirma.asso.fr.
8	Lee, M. H. (2001), An Analysis of Performance Evalua-tion Indexes of Government Supported Research Institutes, research report, Science & Technology Policy Institute, www.stepi.re.kr.
9	MOST (2005a), Action Plan for the Effective R&D of Government Supported Research Institutes, internal report, www.most.go.kr.
10	Neely, J. E. and de Neufville, R. (2001), Hybrid Real Options Valuation of Risky Product Development Projects, International Journal of Technology Policy and Management, 1(1), 29-46. DOI
11	MOST (2005b), The 2005 Work Plan, internal document, www.most.go.kr.
12	KOCI (2005b), Plan for Pilot Programs of Special R&D of Government Supported Research Institutes, internal document.
13	Kim, W. J. and Yang, T. Y. (2005), A Study on the Selection Criteria of Basic R&D Programs, research report, The Entrepreneurship Center, KAIST.