Browse > Article

Collaborative Process Modeling for Embodying e-Manufacturing  

Ryu, Kwang-Yeol (Technology Management Area, INSEAD)
Cho, Yong-Ju (Korea Institute of Industrial Technology)
Choi, Hon-Zong (Korea Institute of Industrial Technology)
Lee, Seok-Woo (Korea Institute of Industrial Technology)
Publication Information
IE interfaces / v.18, no.3, 2005 , pp. 221-233 More about this Journal
Abstract
e-Manufacturing can be referred to as a system methodology enabling the integration of manufacturing operations and IT technologies to achieve objectives of an enterprise. It is recently regarded as a powerful solution to survive in a chaotic marketplace. While conducting an e-Manufacturing project, we first needed to capture collaborative processes conducted by multiple participants in order to define functions of a system supporting them. However, pervasive process modeling techniques including IDEF3, Petri nets, and UML are not sufficient for modeling collaborative processes. Therefore, we first briefly investigate several process modeling methods including aforementioned modeling methods and ARIS focusing on the collaboration point of view. Then, we propose a new modeling method referred to as Collaborative Process Modeling (CPM) to clearly describe collaborative processes. Also, we develop and illustrate a rule for transforming collaborative process models into Marked Graph models to use the analysis power of the Petri nets. Using CPM empowers us to develop collaborative process models with simple notations, understand and facilitate the realization of the collaboration, and verify models before rushing into the development.
Keywords
Collaborative Process Modelling (CPM); Marked Graph; e-Manufacturing;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Baresi, L. (2001), Improving UML with Petri nets, Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 44(4),1-13
2 Lee, J. (2003), E-manufacturing fundamental, tools, and transformation. Robotics and Compurer Integrated Manufacturing, 19, 501-507   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Quatrani, T. (1998), Visual Modeling with Rational Rose and UML, AddisonWesley
4 Ryu, K, Choi, H, Lee, S. (2004), Framework of e-Collaborative Engineering Services for Mold Companies in Korea, Proceedings of IMS International Forum 2004, Italy, 1128-1137(Patt 2)
5 Siikarla, M., Pelronen.j., Selonen, P. (2004), Combining OCL and Ptogramming Languages for UML Model Processing, Electronic Nores in Theoretical Computer Science, 102, 175-194   DOI   ScienceOn
6 NIST (1993), Draft Federal Information Processing Standards Publication 183, Integration Definition for Function Modeling (IDEFO), http://www.idefcom
7 OMG(2003), Unified Modeling language (UML) Version 1.5, http://www.uml.org/.
8 Scheer, A.W. (1994), Business Process Engineering, ARIS-Navigator for Reference Models for Industrial Enterprises, Springer, Berlin
9 Ryu, K, Son, Y, Jung, M. (2003), Modeling and Specifications of Dynamic Agents in Fractal Manufactuting Systems, Computers in Industry, 52(2), 161-182   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Sanrarek, K, Buseif, I.M. (1998), Modelling and design of flexible manufacturing systems using SADT and Petri nets tools, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 76, 212-218   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Thirusangu, K, Rangarajan, K (1995), A nore on the construction of marked graphs, Information Processing Letters, 55, 211-215   DOI   ScienceOn
12 van der Aalst, W.M.P. (1999), Formalization and verification of event-driven process chains, Informaiton and Software Technology, 41, 639-650   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Pooley, R, Stevens, P. (1999), Using UML Software Engineering with Objects and Components, Addison-Wesley
14 Kim, c., Weston, RH., Hodgson, A., Lee, K (2003), The complementary use of IDEF and UML modelling approaches, Computers in Industry, 50, 35- 56   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Booch, G., Rumbaugh,J., Jacobson, I. (999), The Unified Modeling Language User Guide, Addison-Wesley
16 Lopez-Grao, J.P., Merseguer,J., Campos,J. (2004), From UML Activity Diagrms to Stochastic Petri Nets: Application to Software Performance Engineering, Proceedings of the -lth Internarional Workshop on Software and Performance (WOSP '04), CA, USA, 25-36
17 Han, K (2004), A Workflow Analysis Using the Transformation of an UML Activity Diagram into a Petri Net, IE Interfaces, 17(2),200-207
18 Mayer, RJ., Menzel, c.P., Painter, M.K, deWitte, P.S., Blinn, T., and Perakath, B. (1995), Information Integration For Concurrent Engineering (lICE) IDEF3 Process Description Capture Merhod Report, Knowledge Based Systems Inc
19 Rumbaugh,J.,Jacobson, I., Booch, G. (1999), The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual, Addison-Wesley