Browse > Article

A Study on Deciding Priority of Optimal Design Guide for Disassembly Process  

Mok, Hak-Soo (Dept. of Industrial Engineering, Pusan National University)
Lee, Jae-Sung (Dept. of Industrial Engineering, Pusan National University)
Cho, Jong-Rae (Dept. of Industrial Engineering, Pusan National University)
Publication Information
IE interfaces / v.17, no.4, 2004 , pp. 414-425 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study presents the decision of priority for optimal design guide to improve disassembly process. Disassembly process is divided into recognition, transfer and disassembly of assembly point and recognition, transfer and remove of grasp point. Significant influential factors are derived from analyzing the above process. And those factors are used for making the check list to evaluate the properties of parts in each process. Furthermore, the weight with considering disassembly process is also used to determine weight of each process. On the base of the above sequence, qualitative score of disassemblability of each process that is enabled to compare different disassembly processes can be acquired. Ultimately the score helps to decide the priority of design guide for disassembly process.
Keywords
disassembly process; guideline for disassembly;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Kim, S. C, Eo, H. J (1994), Priority Aggregation for AHP based Experts Opinions, Korean Operation Research and Management Science, 19(3), 41-51
2 Harker, P. (1987), The Theory of Ratio Scale Estimation: Saaty's Analytic Hierarchy Process, Management Science, 33(11), 1383-1402
3 Cho, G, T (2002), Aggregation of Multiple Evaluator's Weights in Applying the AHP to Evaluate Technology Alternatives, Management Science, 19(2), 139-153
4 Mok, H. S, Moon, K. S,Park, H. S, Sung, J. H, Choi, H.W(2003), Determination of Design Parameters for Automobile Parts Recycling, Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 20(1), 159-157
5 Mok, H. S, Moon, K. S, Kim, S. H, Moon, D. S (1999), THe Complexity Evaluation System of Automobile Subassembly for Recycling, Journal of the Korean Society of Precision Engineering 16(5), 101-114
6 Herbert, F.(1995), Recycling Handbook, McGraw-Hill
7 Mok, H. S,Park, H. S, Moon, K. S,Cho, J. R(2002), Development of disassembly and recycling technology of automobile parts for environment, Korea Science and Engineering Foundation
8 Mok, H. S, Moon,K. S, Cho, J, R, Sung, J. H. (2002),Development of DFD for recycling, Hyundai-motor
9 Yun, J. G. (1996) Application effects and limitations of AHP as a research methodology-A Comparison of 3 statistical technique for evaluation MIX success factor, Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, 21(3), 109-125
10 Saaty, T., Axiomatic Foundation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Management Science, 32(7), 841-855