1 |
Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., and Tone, K. (2006), Introduction to data envelopment analysis and its uses : with DEA solver software and references. Interface.
|
2 |
Alirezaee, M. R. and Afsharian, M. (2007), Model improvement for computational difficulties of DEA technique in the presence of special DMUs, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 186(2), 1600-1611.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Amirteimoori, A. and Kordrostami, S. (2010), A Euclidean distancebased measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis, Optimization : A Journal of Mathematical Programming and Operations Research, 59(7), 985-996.
|
4 |
Baek, C. and Lee, J. (2009), The relevance of DEA benchmarking information and the Least-Distance Measure, Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 49, 265-275.
DOI
|
5 |
Donthu, N., Hershberger, E. K. and Osmonbekov, T. (2005), Benchmarking marketing productivity using data envelopment analysis, Journal of Business Research, 58(11), 1474-1482.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Doyle, J. and Green, R. (1994), Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA : derivations, meanings and uses, Journal of Operational Research Society, 45(5), 567-578.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Estrada, S. A., Song, H. S., Kim, Y. A., Namn, S., H. and Kang, S. C. (2009), A method of stepwise benchmarking for inefficient DMUs based on the proximity-based target selection, Expert Systems with Applications, 36(9), 11595-11604.
DOI
|
8 |
Gonzalez, A. and Alvarez, A. (2001), From efficiency measurement to efficiency improvement : the choice of a relevant benchmark, European Journal of Operational Research, 133(3), 512-520.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Lim, S., Bae, H., and Lee, L. H. (2011), A study on the selection of benchmarking paths in DEA, Expert System with Applications, 38(6), 7665-7673.
DOI
|
10 |
Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y. Y., Lu, W. M., and Lin, B. J. Y. (2013), A survey of DEA application, OMEGA International Journal of Management Science, 41(5), 893-902.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
MacQueen, J. (1967), Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations, Proceedings of the 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Berkeley, CA : University of California Press, 1, 281-297.
|
12 |
Park, J., Bae, H., and Lim. S. (2012), A DEA-based method of stepwise benchmark target selection with preference, direction and similarity criteria, International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, 8(8), 10-19.
|
13 |
Sharma, M. J. and Yu, S. (2009), Performance based stratification and clustering for benchmarking of container terminals, Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 5016-5022.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Park, J., Lim, S., and Bae, H. (2012), DEA-based port efficiency improvement and stepwise benchmarking target selection, Information-An International Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(12c), 6155-6172.
|
15 |
Ross, A. and Droge, C. (2002), An integrated benchmarking approach to distribution center performance using DEA modeling, Journal of Operations Management, 20(1), 19-32.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Sharma, M. J. and Yu, S. (2010), Benchmark optimization and attribute identification for improvement of container terminals, European Journal of Operational Research, 201, 568-580.
DOI
|
17 |
Seiford, L. M. and Zhu, J. (2003), Context-dependent data envelopment analysis-measuring attractiveness and progress, OMEGA International Journal of Management Science, 31(5), 397-408.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Sexton, T. R., Silkman, R. H. and Hogan, A. J. (1986), Data envelopment analysis : critique and extensions, New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986(32), 73-105.
|
19 |
Spendolini, M. J. (1992), The benchmarking book. New York : Amacom.
|
20 |
Suzuki, S. and Nijkamp, P. (2011), A stepwise-projection data envelopment analysis for public transport operations in Japan, Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 4(2), 139-156.
DOI
|
21 |
Talluri, S. (2000), A benchmarking method for business-process reengineering and improvement, The International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing System, 12(4), 291-304.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Yi, J. J., Lilja, D. J., and Hawkins, D. M. (2003), A statistically rigorous approach for improving simulation methodology, Ninth International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture, 281-291.
|