1 |
Ministry of Knowledge Economy and Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology(KIAT)(MKE.KIAT) (2012), 2012 Guideline of Knowledge Economy R&D Performance Index Design, Korea : MKE.KIAT.
|
2 |
Ministry of Science and Technology and Office of Science and Technology Innovation(MST.OSTI) (2008), 2008 Internal Evaluation Manual of National R&D Programs, Korea : MST.OSTI.
|
3 |
(2005), Release 14.20 StatGuide, State College PA : Minitab Inc.
|
4 |
Montgomery, D. C., Peck, E. A., and Vining, G. G. (2001), Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis, 3rd ed., New York NY : John Wiley and Sons.
|
5 |
Office of Management and Budget(OMB) and Office of Science and Technology Policy(OSTP) (2012), Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies, Subject : Science and Technology Priorities for the FY 2014 Budget, Available Online at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/, (Accessed 1 August 2013).
|
6 |
Office of Science and Technology Policy(OSTP) (2012), Innovation for America's Economy, America's Energy, and American Skills : Science, Technology, Innovation, and STEM Education in the 2013 Budget, Available Online at : http://www.ostp.gov/, (Accessed 1 August 2013).
|
7 |
Robin, S. and Schubert, T. (2013), Cooperation with Public Research Institutions and Success in Innovation : Evidence from France and Germany, Research Policy, 42(1), 149-166.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Ruegg, R. (2006), Bridging from Project Case Study to Portfolio Analysis in a Public R&D Program : A Framework for Evaluation and Introduction to a Composite Performance Rating System, Economic Assessment Office, Advanced Technology Program, National Institute of Standards and Technology(NIST), U.S. Department of Commerce, Gaithersburg, MD.
|
9 |
Ruegg, R. and Feller, I. (2003), A Toolkit for Evaluating Public R&D Investment : Models, Methods and Findings from ATP's First Decade, Economic Assessment Office, Advanced Technology Program, National Institute of Standards and Technology(NIST), U.S. Department of Commerce, Gaithersburg, MD.
|
10 |
Hsu, F. M. and Hsueh, C. C. (2009), Measuring Relative Efficiency of Government-Sponsored R&D Projects : A Three-Stage Approach, Evaluation and Program Planning, 32(2), 178-186.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Fritsch, M. and Lukas, R. (2001), Who Cooperates on R&D?, Research Policy, 30(2), 297-312.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Guan, J. and Chen, K. (2010), Modeling Macro-R&D Production Frontier Performance : An Application to Chinese Province-level R&D, Scientometrics, 82(1), 165-173.
DOI
|
13 |
Hosmer, D. W. and Lemeshow, S. G. (2000), Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd ed., New York NY : John Wiley and Sons.
|
14 |
IBM SPSS (2009), PASW Statistics Release 18, Armonk NY: IBM Corp.
|
15 |
Berchicci, L. (2013), Towards an Open R&D System : Internal R&D Investment, External Knowledge Acquisition and Innovative Performance, Research Policy, 42(1), 117-127.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Laursen, K. and Salter, A. (2006), Open for Innovation : The Role of Openness in Explaining Innovation Performance among U.K. Manufacturing Firms, Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131-150.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology(KEIT) (2011), 2011 Performance Investigation and Analysis of Knowledge Economy Technology Innovation Program, Korea : KEIT.
|
18 |
Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology(KEIT) (2013), 2012 Performance Investigation and Analysis of Knowledge Economy Technology Innovation Program, Korea : KEIT.
|
19 |
Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information(KISTI) (2008), Law-Enforcement Ordinance-Enforcement Regulations, Available Online at : http://www.ntis.go.kr/ThMain.do (Accessed 1 August 2013).
|
20 |
McLaughlin, J. A. and Jordan, G. B. (1999), Logic Models : A Tool for Telling Your Program's Performance Story, Evaluation and Program Planning, 22(1), 65-72.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Ministry of Knowledge Economy(MKE) (2008), 2007 Electric Power Industry R&D Programs, Korea : MKE.
|
22 |
Bickman, L. (1987), The Functions of Program Theory, Special Issue : Using Program Theory in Evaluation, New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1987(33), 5-18.
|
23 |
Chen, X., Wang, X., and Wu, D. D. (2011), Analysing Firm Performance in Chinese IT Industry : DEA Malmquist Productivity Measure, International Journal of Information Technology and Management, 10(1), 3-23.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
24 |
Shipp, S., Chang, C., and Wisniewski, L. (2005), Evaluation Best Practices and Results : The Advanced Technology Program, Economic Assessment Office, Advanced Technology Program, National Institute of Standards and Technology(NIST), U.S. Department of Commerce, Gaithersburg, MD.
|
25 |
Wu, W., Tsai, H., Cheng, K. and Lai, M. (2006), Assessment of Intellectual Capital Management in Taiwanese IC Design Companies : Using DEA and the Malmquist Productivity Index, R&D Management, 36(5), 531-545.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
W. K. Kellogg Foundation(WKKF) (2004), W. K. Kellogg Foundation Logic Development Guide, Battle Creek MI.
|
27 |
Wholey, J. S. (1983), Evaluation and Effective Public Management, Boston MA : Little Brown.
|
28 |
Wholey, J. S. (1987), Evaluability Assessment : Developing Program Theory, Special Issue : Using Program Theory in Evaluation, New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1987(33), 77-92.
|
29 |
Belderbos, R., Carree, M., and Lokshin, B. (2004), Cooperative R&D and Firm Performance, Research Policy, 33(10), 1477-1492.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
30 |
Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology(KEIT) (2010), 2010 Performance Investigation and Analysis of Knowledge Economy Technology Innovation Program, Korea : KEIT.
|