Browse > Article

Development and Implementation of an Integrated Evaluation System for Continuous Maturity of IS Performance  

Kim, Injoo (Naval Forces Development Command)
Leem, Choon Seong (Dept. of Computer&Industrial Engineering Systems, Yonsei University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers / v.29, no.1, 2003 , pp. 100-113 More about this Journal
Abstract
In order to improve business competency by the IS(Information Systems), every enterprise needs to evaluate the current level of IS performance and their utilization. The evaluation that measures the performance of enterprise information systems and diagnoses their effectiveness of business goals and efficiency of resources should represent the useful informations based on sustainable goal-oriented viewpoints to managers. This work develops an integrated evaluation system for continuous maturity of information systems performance, enabling enterprises to achieve their goals of information systems and related business strategies. The integrated evaluation system has been applied to performance measurement of information systems with a huge set of real data from domestic industries for three years, and proven reliable and practical.
Keywords
level of IS(Information Systems) performance; integrated evaluation system; maturity; measurement; business competency;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Calion, J. D.(1996), Competitive Advantage Through Information Technology, McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., pp.5-12
2 Goodhue, D. L.(1998), Development and Measurement Validity of a Task-Technology Fit Instrument for User Evaluations of Information Systems, Decision Sciences Vol.29 No.1, pp.105-138
3 Kim, J-J(1999), Development of an integrated evaluation system based on the continuous improvement model of information system performance, Dissertation for Doctor
4 Leem, C-S(1999), '99 Annual reports for evaluation of IS Performance, IT Research and consulting
5 Mendonqa, M. G.(1997), An Approach to Improving Existing Measurement Frameworks in Software Development Organizations, Dissertation for Doctor, pp.10-16
6 Myers, B. L., Kappelman, L. A., and Prybutok, V. R.(1997), A Comprehensive Model for Assessing the Quality and Productivity of the Information Systems Function: Toward a Theory for Information Systems Assessment, Information Resources Management Journal, Vol.10, No.1, pp.6-25
7 Pulford, K., Annie, K. C., and Stephen, S.(1996), A Quantitative Approach to Software Management: The ami Handbook, Worthingham, England: Addison-Wesley
8 Renaissance Consortium(1997), Renaissance Framework -Method and tools support for the evolution and reengineering of legacy systems
9 Saunders, C. S. and Jones, W.(1992), Measuring performance of the information systems function, Journal of Management Information Systems, p.63-82
10 Shewhart, W. A.(1931), Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product, D, Van Nostrand Company, Inc. New York
11 Goodhue, D. L. and Thompson, R. L.(1995), Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance, MIS Quarterly, pp.213-236
12 Jung, G-H(1996), Weights for informatization index, NCA, pp.8-44
13 Tan, D. S.(1999), Stages in Information Systems Management, Handbook of IS Management, CRC Press LLC, pp.51-75
14 Seddon, M. Y. and Kiew(1994), A Partial Test and Development of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success, Proceeding of the International Conference on Information Systems, Vancouver, Canada, pp99-110
15 Seddon, P. B.(1997), A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success, Information Systems Research, Vol.8, No.3, pp.240-253
16 Shannon, C. E. and Weaver, W.(1949), The Mathematical Theory of Communication, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.
17 Basili, V. R. and Rombach, H. D.(1988), The TAME Project: Toward Improvement-Oriented Software Environment, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol.14, No.6, pp.758-773.B
18 Nolan, R. L. and Wetherbe, J. B.(1980), Toward A Comprehensive Framework for MIS Research, MIS Quarterly, pp.1-19.
19 DeLone, W. H. and McLean, E. R.(1992), Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable, Information Systems Research, Vol.3, No.1, pp.60-95
20 Bergey, J. K., Northrop, L. M., and Smith, D. B.(1997), Enterprise Framework for the Disciplined Evolution of Legacy Systems. CMU/SEI-97-TR-007. Carnegie Mellon University
21 Vemadat, F. B.(1996), Enterprise Modeling and Integration: principles and applications, Champman & Hall, pp.14-16, 317-334
22 Saaty, T. L.(1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process(Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation), McGraw Hill Co.
23 Bate, R., Kuhn, D., Wells, C., Armitage, J., Clark, G., and Cusick, K.(1995), A Systems Engineering Capability Maturity Model, Version 1.1, CMU/SEI-95-MM-003. Carnegie Mellon University
24 The ami Consortium(1992), The ami Handbook: A Quantitative Approach to Software Management, London, England, South Bank Polytechnic
25 Leem, C-S(2000), '00 Annual reports for evaluation of IS Performance, IT Research and consulting
26 Park, R. E., Goethert, W. B., and Florac, W. A.(1996), Goal-Driven Software Measurement - A Guidebook, CMU/SEI-96-HB -002, Carnegie Mellon University
27 Mendonqa, M. G., Basili, V. R., Bhandari, I. S., and Dawson, J.(1998), An approach to improving existing measurement framework, IBM Systems Journal, Vol.37, No.4, pp484-501
28 Leem, C-S(1998), '98 Annual reports for evaluation of IS Performance, IT Research and consulting
29 Kim, I-J and Leem, C-S(1999), An Integrated Evaluation Framework for Continuous Capability Maturity of Enterprise Information Systems, Proceeding for APIEMS'99, pp.69-72
30 Mason, R. O.(1978), Measuring Information Output: A Communication Systems, Information & Management, Vol. 1, No.5, pp219-234
31 McFeeley, B.(1996), IDEAL: A User's Guide for Software Process Improvement, CMU/SEI-96- HB-001, Carnegie Mellon University
32 Deming, W. E.(1986), Out of The Crisis, MIT Center for Advanced Engineering Stidy, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.