Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2021.08.18

Psychometric properties of an instrument 3: convergent, discriminant, known-groups, and criterion validity  

Lee, Eun-Hyun (Graduate School of Public Health, Ajou University)
Publication Information
Women's Health Nursing / v.27, no.3, 2021 , pp. 176-179 More about this Journal
Abstract
Before evaluating convergent, discriminant, and known-groups validity, it is suggested to design an instrument that reflects hypothetical relationships or differences with other comparator instruments or groups. For criterion validity, a gold-standard instrument measuring the same construct should be carefully selected.
Keywords
Convergent validity; Discriminant validity; Known-groups validity, Criterion validity;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737-745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006   DOI
2 Lee EH, Lee YW, Lee KW, Nam M, Kim SH. A new comprehensive diabetes health literacy scale: development and psychometric evaluation. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;88:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.08.002   DOI
3 Lee EH, van der Bijl J, Shortridge-Baggett LM, Han SJ, Moon SH. Psychometric properties of the diabetes management self-efficacy scale in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes. Int J Endocrinol. 2015;2015:780701. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/780701   DOI
4 Lee EH, Kang EH, Kang HJ. Evaluation of studies on the measurement properties of self-reported instruments. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2020;14(5):267-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2020.11.004   DOI
5 de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL. Measurement in medicine: a practical guide. London: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
6 Lee J, Lee EH, Chae D, Kim CJ. Patient-reported outcome measures for diabetes self-care: a systematic review of measurement properties. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020;105:103498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103498   DOI
7 Polit DF, Yang FM. Measurement and the measurement of change. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer; 2015.
8 Arbuckle RA, Humphrey L, Vardeva K, Arondekar B, Danten-Viala M, Scott JA, Snoek FJ. Psychometric evaluation of the Diabetes Symptom Checklist-Revised (DSC-R)-a measure of symptom distress. Value Health. 2009;12(8):1168-1175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00571.x   DOI
9 Mokkink LB, de Vet HC, Prinsen CA, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1171-1179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4   DOI
10 Lee EH, Kwon O, Hahm KB, Kim W, Kim JI, Cheung DY, et al. Irritable bowel syndrome-specific health-related quality of life instrument: development and psychometric evaluation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016;14(1):22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0423-9   DOI
11 Lee EH, Lee KW, Song R, Snoek FJ, Moon SH. Psychometric evaluation of the Korean version of the Diabetes Symptom Checklist-Revised (DSC-R) for patients with type 2 diabetes. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:77. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-12-77   DOI