Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.20498/fir.2022.2.1.33

A study on digital transformation of SMEs from the perspective of information technology  

PAN, Xiao-Yan (School of Economics and Management, Taizhou University, Seoul School of Integrated Sciences & Technologies (aSSIST))
Publication Information
Fourth Industrial Review / v.2, no.1, 2022 , pp. 33-43 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose - With the rapid development of information technology, the digital economy has become an important grip of the new development pattern, and the digital transformation of enterprises is a major trend. As SMEs are the mainstay of the economy and employment, it is important to study the digital transformation of SMEs to promote the development of the digital economy. Research design, data, and methodology - Based on a resource-based view, this report analyses the current situation and issues of digital transformation of SMEs from the perspective of digital orientation as well as the breadth and depth of technological capabilities of enterprises, using data from a survey of 200 manufacturing enterprises in China. Result - The results show that SMEs generally have a digital transformation mindset, but a weak digital foundation. In order to execute a digital strategy, companies need digital transformation capabilities. These behavioral capabilities are guided by the strategic direction of the business, and companies with strong capabilities are always trying to tap into the full digital potential. Conclusion - In order to effectively promote the digital transformation of SMEs, we suggest that SMEs pay attention to digital capability building, make good use of digital platforms and network resources, and lay a solid foundation for digital transformation; meanwhile, we suggest that government departments play a guiding and supporting role to build a cross-industry and cross-sector digital synergy system to help promote the development of SMEs' digital transformation. This paper presents some suggestions from both the internal and external environment of the enterprise, with the expectation of contributing to the digital transformation practices of SMEs.
Keywords
Digital Transformation; Technological Capabilities; Breadth; Depth; Transformation Orientation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Hakala, H., & Kohtamaki, M. (2011). Configurations of entrepreneurial-customer-and technology orientation: Differences in learning and performance of software companies. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 17(1), 64-81.   DOI
2 Yoo, Y. (2010). Computing in everyday life: A call for research on experiential computing. MIS Quarterly, 34(2), 213-231.   DOI
3 Dalenogare, L. S., Benitez, G. B., Ayala, N. F., & Frank, A. G. (2018). The expected contribution of industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 204, 383-394.   DOI
4 Felsberger, A., Qaiser, F. H., Choudhary, A., & Reiner, G. (2020). The impact of Industry 4.0 on the reconciliation of dynamic capabilities: Evidence from the European manufacturing industries. Production Planning & Control, 1-24.
5 Gatignon, H., & Xuereb, J. M. (1997). Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1), 77-90.   DOI
6 Khin, S., & Ho, T. C. (2019). Digital technology, digital capability and organizational performance: A mediating role of digital innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 11(2), 177-195.   DOI
7 Matt, C., Hess, T., & Benlian, A. (2015). Digital transformation strategies. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 57(5), 339-343.   DOI
8 Mladineo, M., Veza, I., & Gjeldum, N. (2017). Solving partner selection problem in cyber-physical production networks using the HUMANT algorithm. International Journal of Production Research, 55(9), 2506-2521.   DOI
9 Prinsloo, J., Vosloo, J. C., & Mathews, E. H. (2019). Towards Industry 4.0: a roadmap for the South African heavy industry sector. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 30(3), 174-186.
10 Ong, C. S., & Chen, P. (2013). Information technology capability-enabled performance, future performance, and value. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 113(5), 669-682.   DOI
11 Sebastian, I. M., Ross, J. W., Beath, C., Mocker, M., Moloney, K. G., & Fonstad, N. O. (2020). How big old companies Navigate digital transformation. Strategic Information Management, 16(3), 197-213.
12 Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118-144.   DOI
13 Haleblian, J., McNamara, G., Kolev, K., & Dykes, B. J. (2012). Exploring firm characteristics that differentiate leaders from followers in industry merger waves: A competitive dynamics perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1037-1052.   DOI
14 Zhou, K. Z., & Li, C. B. (2010). How strategic orientations influence the building of dynamic capability in emerging economies. Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 224-231.   DOI
15 Freel, M. S. (2005). Patterns of innovation and skills in small firms. Technovation, 25(2), 123-134.   DOI
16 Scott, S. V., Van Reenen, J., & Zachariadis, M. (2017). The long-term effect of digital innovation on bank performance: An empirical study of SWIFT adoption in financial services. Research Policy, 46(5), 984-1004.   DOI
17 Blichfeldt, H., & Rita, F. (2021) Performance effects of digital technology adoption and product & service innovation-A process-industry perspective. Technovation, 102275.
18 Frank, A. G., Mendes, G. H., Ayala, N. F., & Ghezzi, A. (2019). Servitization and Industry 4.0 convergence in the dgital transformation of product firms: A business model innovation perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 341-351.   DOI
19 Golzer, P., & Fritzsche, A. (2017). Data-driven operations management: Organisational implications of the digital transformation in industrial practice. Production Planning & Control, 28(16), 1332-1343   DOI
20 Grover, V., & Kohli, R. (2012). Cocreating IT value: New capabilities and metrics for multifirm environments. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 225-232.   DOI
21 Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N., Kiron, D., & Buckley, N. (2015). Strategy, not technology, drives digital transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review and Deloitte University Press, 14, 1-25.
22 Liu, D. Y., Chen, S. W., & Chou, T. C. (2011). Resource fit in digital transformation: Lessons learned from the CBC bank global E-banking project. Management Decision, 49(10), 1728-1742.   DOI
23 Berman, S. J. (2012). Digital transformation: Opportunities to create new business models. Strategy & Leadership, 40(2), 16-24.   DOI
24 Nasiri, M., Ukko, J., Saunila, M., & Rantala, T. (2020). Managing the digital supply chain: The role of smart technologies. Technovation, 96, 102121.   DOI
25 Tortorella, G. L., & D. Fettermann. (2018). Implementation of Industry 4.0 and lean production in Brazilian manufacturing companies. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2975-2987.   DOI
26 Warner, K. S., & Wager, M. (2019). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Planning, 52(3), 326-349.   DOI
27 Renko, M., Carsrud, A., & Brannback, M. (2009). The effect of a market orientation, entrepreneurial orientation, and technological capability on innovativeness: A study of young biotechnology ventures in the United States and in Scandinavia. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(3), 331-369.   DOI
28 Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889-901.   DOI
29 Zhu, K., & Kraemer, K. L. (2005). Post-adoption variations in usage and value of e-business by organizations: cross-country evidence from the retail industry. Information systems research, 16(1), 61-84.   DOI
30 Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.   DOI