Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4250/jcvi.2018.26.e10

Cardiac and Pericardial 18F-FDG Uptake on Oncologic PET/CT: Comparison with Echocardiographic Findings  

Yi, Jeong-Eun (Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine)
Yoon, Hyuk Jin (Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine)
O, Joo Hyun (Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine)
Youn, Ho-Joong (Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul, St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine)
Publication Information
Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / v.26, no.2, 2018 , pp. 93-102 More about this Journal
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Interpretation of cardiac uptake on 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ($^{18}F-FDG$ PET/CT) is often confounded by intense physiological FDG uptake and numerous benign conditions. The aim of the study was to describe the echocardiographic features in concordance with cardiac and pericardial $^{18}F-FDG$ uptake on whole-body oncology PET/CT. METHODS: We enrolled 43 consecutive patients (34 solid tumors, 8 lymphomas and 1 leukemia) who were newly diagnosed with non-cardiac malignancy showing incidental cardiac or pericardial $^{18}F-FDG$ uptake on PET/CT and underwent transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTE) within 1 month of PET/CT. The maximum standardized uptake ($SUV_{max}$) of all lesions was measured. RESULTS: Fifty-six $^{18}F-FDG$ uptake lesions (32 pericardium, 7 myocardium, 9 cardiac chambers and 8 great vessels) were found, and pericardial effusion was the most common echocardiographic finding (22/43, 51.2%) among study population. Pericardial FDG uptake was shown as pericardial effusion (68.8%), intrapericardial echogenic materials (31.3%), pericardial thickening (28.1%), hyperechogenicity of myopericardium (18.8%), and restricted sliding movement or constrictive pericarditis (15.6%) on TTE. Lesions with regional wall motion abnormality (p = 0.004) or constrictive pericarditis (p = 0.021) had significantly higher mean $SUV_{max}$ than those without. Myocardial FDG uptake demonstrated pericardial effusion (57.1%), regional wall motion abnormality (57.1%), and increased myocardial wall thickness (42.9%). All cardiac chamber FDG uptakes showed intracardiac mass on TTE. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac or pericardial $^{18}F-FDG$ uptake on oncology PET/CT shows characteristic echocardiographic features according to which heart sites are involved.
Keywords
Cardiac metastases; $^{18}F-FDG$ PET/CT; Echocardiography;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Bussani R, De-Giorgio F, Abbate A, Silvestri F. Cardiac metastases. J Clin Pathol 2007;60:27-34.   DOI
2 Bisel HF, Wroblewski F, Ladue JS. Incidence and clinical manifestations of cardiac metastases. J Am Med Assoc 1953;153:712-5.   DOI
3 Lam KY, Dickens P, Chan AC. Tumors of the heart. A 20-year experience with a review of 12,485 consecutive autopsies. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1993;117:1027-31.
4 Butany J, Leong SW, Carmichael K, Komeda M. A 30-year analysis of cardiac neoplasms at autopsy. Can J Cardiol 2005;21:675-80.
5 McDonnell PJ, Mann RB, Bulkley BH. Involvement of the heart by malignant lymphoma: a clinicopathologic study. Cancer 1982;49:944-51.   DOI
6 Weber WA. Positron emission tomography as an imaging biomarker. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:3282-92.   DOI
7 Fischman AJ. Positron emission tomography in the clinical evaluation of metastatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:691-6.   DOI
8 Fletcher JW, Djulbegovic B, Soares HP, et al. Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology. J Nucl Med 2008;49:480-508.   DOI
9 Ding HJ, Shiau YC, Wang JJ, Ho ST, Kao A. The influences of blood glucose and duration of fasting on myocardial glucose uptake of [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose. Nucl Med Commun 2002;23:961-5.   DOI
10 Kaneta T, Hakamatsuka T, Takanami K, et al. Evaluation of the relationship between physiological FDG uptake in the heart and age, blood glucose level, fasting period, and hospitalization. Ann Nucl Med 2006;20:203-8.   DOI
11 Fukuchi K, Ohta H, Matsumura K, Ishida Y. Benign variations and incidental abnormalities of myocardial FDG uptake in the fasting state as encountered during routine oncology positron emission tomography studies. Br J Radiol 2007;80:3-11.   DOI
12 Maurer AH, Burshteyn M, Adler LP, Steiner RM. How to differentiate benign versus malignant cardiac and paracardiac 18F FDG uptake at oncologic PET/CT. Radiographics 2011;31:1287-305.   DOI
13 Johnson MH, Soulen RL. Echocardiography of cardiac metastases. AJR 1983;141:677-81.   DOI
14 Kutalek SP, Panidis IP, Kotler MN, Mintz GS, Carver J, Ross JJ. Metastatic tumors of the heart detected by two-dimensional echocardiography. Am Heart J 1985;109:343-9.   DOI
15 Tominaga K, Shinkai T, Eguchi K, et al. The value of two-dimensional echocardiography in detecting malignant tumors in the heart. Cancer 1986;58:1641-7.   DOI
16 Auger D, Pressacco J, Marcotte F, Tremblay A, Dore A, Ducharme A. Cardiac masses: an integrative approach using echocardiography and other imaging modalities. Heart 2011;97:1101-9.   DOI
17 Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;16:233-70.   DOI
18 Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP, et al. Recommendations for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function by Echocardiography: An Update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;17:1321-60.   DOI
19 Klein AL, Abbara S, Agler DA, et al. American Society of Echocardiography clinical recommendations for multimodality cardiovascular imaging of patients with pericardial disease: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2013;26:965-1012.e15.   DOI
20 Lobert P, Brown RK, Dvorak RA, Corbett JR, Kazerooni EA, Wong KK. Spectrum of physiological and pathological cardiac and pericardial uptake of FDG in oncology PET-CT. Clin Radiol 2013;68:e59-71.   DOI
21 Sheikine Y, Di Carli MF. Integrated PET/CT in the assessment of etiology and viability in ischemic heart failure. Curr Heart Fail Rep 2008;5:136-42.   DOI
22 Kobylecka M, Maczewska J, Fronczewska-Wieniawska K, Mazurek T, Plazinska MT, Krolicki L. Myocardial viability assessment in 18FDG PET/CT study (18FDG PET myocardial viability assessment). Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur 2012;15:52-60.   DOI
23 Reynen K, Kockeritz U, Strasser RH. Metastases to the heart. Ann Oncol 2004;15:375-81.   DOI
24 MacGee W. Metastatic and invasive tumours involving the heart in a geriatric population: a necropsy study. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol 1991;419:183-9.   DOI