Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4250/jcu.2010.18.4.127

Progression Rate of Aortic Valve Stenosis in Korean Patients  

Ryu, Dong-Ryeol (Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Imaging Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Park, Sung-Ji (Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Imaging Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Han, Hye-Jin (Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Imaging Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Lee, Hyun-Jong (Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Imaging Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Chang, Sung-A (Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Imaging Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Choi, Jin-Oh (Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Imaging Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Lee, Sang-Chul (Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Imaging Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Park, Seung-Woo (Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Imaging Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Oh, Jae-K. (Division of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Imaging Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Publication Information
Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / v.18, no.4, 2010 , pp. 127-133 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: Although there were studies about ethnic differences in aortic valve thickness and calcification that they may play a role in aortic valvular stenosis (AVS) progression, few studies about the progression rate of AVS in Asian population have been reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the progression rate of AVS in Korean patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 325 patients (181 men, age: 67 ${\pm}$ 13 years) with AVS who had 2 or more echocardiograms at least 6 months apart from 2003 to 2008. The patients with other significant valvular diseases or history of cardiac surgery were excluded. The progression rate of AVS was expressed in terms of increase in maximum aortic jet velocity per year (meter/second/year). Results: Baseline AVS was mild in 207 (64%), moderate in 81 (25%), and severe in 37 (11%). There were no significant differences among the three groups in terms of age, gender, hypertension, smoking, and hypercholesterolemia. The mean progression rate was 0.12 ${\pm}$ 0.23 m/s/yr and more rapid in severe AVS (0.28 ${\pm}$ 0.36 m/s/yr) when compared to moderate (0.14 ${\pm}$ 0.26 m/s/yr) and mild AVS (0.09 ${\pm}$ 0.18 m/s/yr) (p < 0.001). The progression rate in bicuspid AVS was significantly higher than other AVS (0.23 ${\pm}$ 0.35 vs. 0.11 ${\pm}$ 0.20 m/s/yr, p = 0.002). By multivariate analysis, initial maximum aortic jet velocity (Beta = 0.175, p = 0.003), bicuspid aortic valve (Beta = 0.127, p = 0.029), and E velocity (Beta = -0.134, p = 0.018) were significantly associated with AVS progression. Conclusion: The progression rate of AVS in Korean patients is slower than that reported in Western population. Therefore, ethnic difference should be considered for the follow-up of the patients with AVS.
Keywords
Aortic valvular stenosis; Natural history; Disease progression;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Otto CM, Burwash IG, Legget ME, Munt BI, Fujioka M, Healy NL, Kraft CD, Miyake-Hull CY, Schwaegler RG. Prospective study of asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Clinical, echocardiographic, and exercise predictors of outcome. Circulation 1997;95:2262-70.   DOI
2 Otto CM, Pearlman AS, Gardner CL. Hemodynamic progression of aortic stenosis in adults assessed by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989;13:545-50.   DOI
3 Rosenhek R, Binder T, Porenta G, Lang I, Christ G, Schemper M, Maurer G, Baumgartner H. Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 2000;343:611-7.   DOI
4 Rosenhek R, Klaar U, Schemper M, Scholten C, Heger M, Gabriel H, Binder T, Maurer G, Baumgartner H. Mild and moderate aortic stenosis. Natural history and risk stratification by echocardiography. Eur Heart J 2004;25:199-205.   DOI
5 Bahler RC, Desser DR, Finkelhor RS, Brener SJ, Youssefi M. Factors leading to progression of valvular aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1999;84: 1044-8.   DOI
6 Peter M, Hoffmann A, Parker C, Lüscher T, Burckhardt D. Progression of aortic stenosis. Role of age and concomitant coronary artery disease. Chest 1993;103:1715-9.   DOI
7 Sashida Y, Rodriguez CJ, Boden-Albala B, Jin Z, Elkind MS, Liu R, Rundek T, Sacco RL, DiTullio MR, Homma S. Ethnic differences in aortic valve thickness and related clinical factors. Am Heart J 2010; 159:698-704.   DOI
8 Nasir K, Katz R, Takasu J, Shavelle DM, Detrano R, Lima JA, Blumenthal RS, O'Brien K, Budoff MJ. Ethnic differences between extra-coronary measures on cardiac computed tomography: multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). Atherosclerosis 2008;198:104-14.   DOI
9 Park JC, Kim W, Kim JH, Park WS, Park OY, Ahn YK, Jeong MH, Cho JG, Oh BS, Ahn BH, Kim SH, JC K. Prognostic factors for medically treated patients with valvular aortic stenosis. Chonnam Med J 2003;39:29-36.
10 Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, Chambers JB, Evangelista A, Griffin BP, Iung B, Otto CM, Pellikka PA, Quinones M; American Society of Echocardiography; European Association of Echocardiography. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009;22:1-23; quiz 101-2.   DOI
11 Devereux RB, Alonso DR, Lutas EM, Gottlieb GJ, Campo E, Sachs I, Reichek N. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol 1986;57:450-8.   DOI
12 Oh JK, Taliercio CP, Holmes DR Jr, Reeder GS, Bailey KR, Seward JB, Tajik AJ. Prediction of the severity of aortic stenosis by Doppler aortic valve area determination: prospective Doppler-catheterization correlation in 100 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988;11:1227-34.   DOI
13 Villari B, Hess OM, Kaufmann P, Krogmann ON, Grimm J, Krayenbuehl HP. Effect of aortic valve stenosis (pressure overload) and regurgitation (volume overload) on left ventricular systolic and diastolic function. Am J Cardiol 1992;69:927-34.   DOI
14 Kume T, Kawamoto T, Okura H, Watanabe N, Toyota E, Neishi Y, Okahashi N, Yamada R, Yoshida K. Rapid progression of mild to moderate aortic stenosis in patients older than 80 years. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007;20:1243-6.   DOI
15 Palta S, Pai AM, Gill KS, Pai RG. New insights into the progression of aortic stenosis: implications for secondary prevention. Circulation 2000; 101:2497-502.   DOI
16 Edwards JE. The congenital bicuspid aortic valve. Circulation 1961;23: 485-8.