Browse > Article

Analysis of Smoke Control According to Jet Fan Location in Straight Long Tunnel  

Byun, Ju-Suk (Songpa Technology Appraisal Center, Kibo Technology Fund)
Lim, Hyo-Jae (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hoseo University)
Kang, Shin-Hyung (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Konyang University)
Lee, Jin-Ho (School of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Engineering / v.19, no.9, 2007 , pp. 662-668 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this study, jet fans are installed with 4 cases in the straight long tunnel; inlet-side setup, middle-side setup, outlet-side setup, and dispersion setup. A bus is selected as fired car, of which fire size is 20MW. And fired car locates at 100m, 700m, 1500m position from tunnel inlet, respectively. FLUENT, commercial finite-volume code, is used to analyze the performance. The velocity profile, $CO_2$ concentration, temperature distribution are examined for analysis. Performance of smoke control is compared by the backlayering length. Consequently, inlet-side setup of jet fans is a little more efficient than other cases considering the fire occurrence frequency in tunnel.
Keywords
Long tunnel; Jet fan; Fire; Smoke control; Back layering;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Miclea, P. C., 1996, Potential Use and Limitation of CFD Modeling Technique for tunnel and Station Fires, Tunnel Inside Management First International Conference, Korsor, Demark, pp. 311 -320
2 U. S. Department of transportation urban mass transportation administration office of Technology Development and Deployment Washington DC 20590, 1980, Subway Environment Simulation(SES) Computer Program
3 Haack, A., 1992, Fire Protection in Traffic Tunnel-Initial Recognitions from Large Scale Tests, First International Conference Basel, Switzerland, pp.349-362
4 Richter, E., 1995, Smoke and Temperature Development in Tunnels Experimental Results of Full Scale Fire Tests, 2nd International Conference on Safety in Road and Rail Tunnels, Granada, Spain. pp.295-302
5 Levy, S., Sandzimier, J. Harvey, N. and E. Rosenbluth, 1999, CFD Model For Transverse Ventilation Systems, International Conference Tunnel Fires and Escape from Tunnels, Lyon, France, pp. 223-233
6 Riess, I. and Bettelini, M., 1999, The Prediction of Smoke Propagation due to Road Tunnel Fires, First International Conference on Tunnel Fires and One Day Seminar on Escape from Tunnels, Lyon, France, pp.213-222
7 Arnaudet, J. G., 2000, Proceeding of International Conference on Tunnel and Underground Station Fire, Hong Kong, pp. 185-193
8 Rhodes, N., 1999, Smoke in the Far Field, the First International Conference on Long Road Tunnels, Basel, Switzerland, pp.91-95
9 Yau, R. and Cheng, 2000, Effect of Local Smoke Extraction on Smoke Control of Road Tunnel Fire, Proceeding of International Conference on Tunnel and Underground Station Fires, Hong Kong, pp.73-95
10 Massachusettes Highway Department and Federal Highway Administration, 1995, Memorial Tunnel Fire Ventilation Test Program Report, USA, pp. 2-3
11 Miles, S., and Kumar, S. 1999, Validation of a CFD Model for Fires in the Memorial Tunnel, International Conference Tunnel Fires and Escape from Tunnels, Lyon, France, pp. 159-168
12 Sanchez, G. and Lee, L., 2000, Design and Implementation Consideration for Emergency Ventilation Fan Plants, Proceeding of International Conference on Tunnel and Underground Station Fires, Hong Kong, pp.97-104
13 Cox, G. 1995, Combustion Fundamentals of Fire, Fire Research Station, Watford, UK, pp.334-350
14 Drake, S. N., 2000, Confidence Gaining by Computer Simulation of Emergency Tunnel Ventilation Design, Proceeding of International Conference on Tunnel and Underground Station Fires, Hong Kong, pp. 105-113
15 Satoh, K, and Miyazaki, Sanae. 1989, A Numerical Study of Large Fires in Tunnel, Report of Fire Research Institute of Japan, No. 68, pp.19-34