Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7844/kirr.2011.20.3.028

Chemical Remediation and Recirculation Technologies of Wastewater from Metal-Contaminated Soil Washing  

Lim, Mi-Hee (Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KiGAM))
Abn, Ji-Whan (Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KiGAM))
Publication Information
Resources Recycling / v.20, no.3, 2011 , pp. 28-39 More about this Journal
Abstract
This review investigated theoretical principals and practical application examples on recirculation system of soil washing-wastewater treatment-treated water recycling. As for technologies which have attempted to remediating metals-contaminated soil in and around country, there are reactive barriers, encapsulation, solidification/stabilization, soil washing, and phytoremediation. Among those, in particular, this review covers soil washing technology which physicochemically removes contaminants from soils. The major drawbacks of this technology are to generate a large amount of wastewater which contains contaminants complexed with ligands of washing solution and needs additional treatment process. To solve these problems, many chemical treatment methods have been developed as follows: precipitation/coprecipitation, membrane filtration, adsorption treatment, ion exchange, and electrokinetic treatment. In the last part of the review, recent research and field application cases on soil washing wastewater treatment and recycling were introduced. Based on these integrated technologies, it could be achieved to solve the problem of soil washing wastewater and to enhance cost effective process by reducing total water resources use in soil washing process.
Keywords
Soil washing; Chemical remediation of wastewater; Wastewater recycling; Arsenic(As); Heavy metal;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 U.S. EPA. May 2000: Regulations on the disposal of arsenic residuals from drinking water treatment plants. Office of Research and Development. EPA-600-R-00-025. http://www.epa.gov/ORD/WebPubs/residuals/index.htm
2 U.S. EPA. December 2000: Technologies and cost for Removal of Arsenic from Drinking Water. Office of Water. EPA 815-R-00-028. http://www.epa.gov/safewater/ars/ treatments_and_costs.pdf
3 L.G. Twidwell, September 1999: Technologies and potential technologies for removing arsenic from process and mine wastewater. Presented at "REWAS'99." San Sebastian, Spain. http://www.mtech.edu/metallurgy/arsenic/ REWASAS%20for%20proceedings99%20in%20word.pdf
4 U.S. EPA. May 1990: Final best demonstrated available technology (BDAT) background document for K031, K084, K101, K102, Characteristic arsenic wastes (D004), Characteristic selenium wastes (D010), and P and U wastes containing arsenic and selenium listing constituents. Office of Solid Waste.
5 U.S. EPA. May 2000: Regulations on the disposal of arsenic residuals from drinking water treatment plants. Office of Research and Development. EPA/600/R-00/025. http://www.epa.gov/ORD/WebPubs/residuals/index.htm
6 M. Lim, G.C. Han, J.W. Ahn, K.S. You, and H.S. Kim, 2009: Leachability of Arsenic and Heavy Metals from Mine Tailings of Abandoned Metal Mines. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 6, pp. 2865-2879.   DOI
7 D. Voglar, and D. Lestan, 2010: Electrochemical separation and reuse of EDTA after extraction of Cu contaminated soil. J. Hazar. Mater., 180, pp. 152-157.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 T. Makino, T. Kamiya, H. Takano, T. Itou, N. Sekiya, K. Sasaki, Y. Maejima, and K. Sugahara, 2007:. Remediation of cadmium-contaminated paddy soils by washing with calcium chloride: Verification of on-site washing, Environ. Pollut., 147, pp. 112-119.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 K. Baek, D.H. Kim, S.W. Park, B.G. Ryu, T. Bajargal, and J.S. Yang, 2009: Electrolyte conditioning-enhanced electrokinetic remediation of arsenic-contaminated mine tailing. J. Hazar. Mater., 161, pp. 457-462.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 C.N. Mulligan, R.N. Yong, and B.F. Gibbs, 2001: Remediation technologies for metal-contaminated soils and groundwater: an evaluation. Engineering Geology, 60, pp. 193-207.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency Publication), April 1996: Soil Washing as a Cleanup Method
12 U.S. EPA, September 2002: Arsenic treatment technologies for soil, waste, and water, EPA-542R-02-004, http:// www.epa.gov/tio/download/remed/542r02004/arsenic _report.pdf
13 M. Jang, J.S. Hwang, S.I. Choi, and J.K. Park, 2005: Remediation of arsenic-contaminated soils and washing effluents, Chemosphere, 60, pp. 344-354.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 A. Giacomino, M. Malandrino, O. Abollino, M. Veayutham, T. Chinnathangavel, and E, Mentasti, 2010: An approach for arsenic in a contaminated soil: Speciation, fractionation, extraction and effluent decontamination. Environ. Pollut., 158, pp. 416-423.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 U.S. EPA. Engineering Bulletin., March 1997: Technology alternatives for the remediation of soils contaminated with arsenic, cadmium, chromium, mercury, and lead. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 540-S-97-500, http:// www.epa.gov/ncepi/Catalog/EPA540S97500.html
16 Interstate Technology Regulatory Cooperation (ITRC), Metals in Soils Work Team, December 1997: Technical and regulatory guidelines for soil washing, final report of soil washing project, USA
17 Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable (FRTR), Federal remediation technologies reference guide and screening manual, Version 3.0.
18 U.S. EPA. December 2000: Technologies and costs for removal of arsenic from drinking water. Office of Water. EPA-R-00-028.http://www.epa.gov/safewater/ars/ treatments_and_costs.pdf
19 U.S. EPA. May 2000: Regulations on the disposal of arsenic residuals from drinking water treatment plants. Office of Research and Development. EPA-600-R-00-025. http://www.epa.gov/ncepihom
20 C.R. Evanko and D.A. Dzomback, October 1997: Remediation of metals-contaminated soils and groundwater. Prepared for the Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center, Technology Evaluation Report TE-97-01
21 Earthvision. October 1999: Erokinetic Remediation. http:// www.earthvision.net/filecomponent/1727.html
22 S. Pensaert, 1998: The Treatment of aquifers contaminated with arsenic, zinc and cadmium by the bipolar electrolysis technique: The Overpelt Project
23 U.S. EPA. July 1995: Contaminants and remedial options at selected metal-contaminated sites. Office of Research and Development. EPA-540-R-95-512.http://www.epa.gov/ ncepi/Catalog/EPA540R95512.html
24 Van Cauwenberghe, July 1997: Electrokinetics, prepared for the Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center, GWRTAC O Series Technology Overview Report TO-97-03. http://www.gwrtac.org/pdf/elctro_o.pdf
25 U.S. EPA. September 2002: Arsenic treatment technologies for soil, waste, and water, solid waste and emergency response (5102G), EPA-542-R-02-004, www.epa.gov/tio clu-in.org/arsenic
26 N. Finzger and D. Lestan, 2008: The two-phase leaching of Pb, Zn and Cd contaminated soil using EDTA and electrochemical treatment of the washing solution, Chemosphere, 73, pp. 1484-1491.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 J. Jung, J.S. Yang, S.H. Kim, and J.W. Yang, 2008: Feasibility of micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF) for the heavy metal removal in soil washing effluent, Desalination, 222, pp. 202-211.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 L.M. Ortega, R. Lebrun, J.F. Blais, R. Hausler, and P. Drogui, 2008: Effectiveness of soil washing, nanofiltration and electrochemical treatment for the recovery of metal ions coming from a contaminated soil, Water Res., 42, pp. 1943-1952.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 U.S. EPA. July 1995: Contaminants and remedial options at selected metal-contaminated sites. Office of Research and Development. EPA/540/R-95/512.. http://search.epa.gov/ s97is.vts
30 U.S. EPA. December 2000: Technologies and Costs for Removal of Arsenic From Drinking Water. Office of Water. EPA-R-00-028. http://www.epa.gov/safewater/ars/ treatments_and_costs.pdf