Browse > Article

Canopy-Related Characteristics of Korean Soybean Cultivars  

Kim, Hong-Sig (College of Agriculture, Life & Environment Sciences, Chungbuk National University)
Lee, Ku-Hwan (College of Agriculture, Life & Environment Sciences, Chungbuk National University)
Song, Hang-Lin (College of Agriculture, Life & Environment Sciences, Chungbuk National University)
Kim, Seong-Jin (College of Agriculture, Life & Environment Sciences, Chungbuk National University)
Hur, Gun (College of Agriculture, Life & Environment Sciences, Chungbuk National University)
Woo, Sun-Hee (College of Agriculture, Life & Environment Sciences, Chungbuk National University)
Jong, Seung-Keun (College of Agriculture, Life & Environment Sciences, Chungbuk National University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Breeding Science / v.40, no.2, 2008 , pp. 143-152 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was conducted to obtain basic information on mainstem, branch and leaf characteristics related to canopy for development of high yielding cultivar using 70 Korean soybean cultivars developed from 1913 to 2000. Variations of canopy width, branch length, and canopy width/length ratio were higher compared to other characteristics among 12 mainstem and branch characters. Variations of petiole angle, leaflet width/length ratio and compound leaf dry weight were higher than other characteristics among eight leaf characters related to plant canopy. Three classifications of soybean cultivars were used based on usage: I)soy sauce and tofu, II)bean sprout, and III)cooking with rice. Canopy width/length ratio was higher in group III, cooking with rice than group I, soy sauce and tofu, and group II, bean sprout, and there was no difference between the two, group I and group II. The total branch length/main stem height ratio was higher in group II, bean sprout and group III, cooking with rice than group I, soy sauce and tofu. Mainstem and branch characteristics related to plant canopy were classified into four groups by ratio of canopy width/length and total branch length/main stem length, respectively. Soybean cultivars with narrow canopy and high dependence of mainstem were Danweonkong, Keumkangkong, Shelby, and Shinpaldalkong. Soybean cultivars with broad canopy and high dependence of mainstem were Kanglim, Keumkangdaelip, and Jinyulkong, and a cultivar with broad canopy and high dependence of branch were Geomjeongkong 2. Leaflet length/width ratio was lowest in cooking with rice and there was no difference between soy sauce and tofu and bean sprout. Compound leaf area was largest in cooking with rice and smallest in bean sprout. Leaf petiole length was short in bean sprout and there was no difference between soy sauce and tofu and bean sprout. Leaf petiole angle was highest in cooking with rice and lowest in bean sprout. Leaf type was classified into four groups based on leaflet width/length ratio and compound leaf area, respectivly. Buseok and Taekwangkong had an oval leaflet and largest area of compound leaf. Eunhakong and Sohokong had extreme narrow leaflet and smallest area of compound leaf. Leaf petiole type was classified into three and four groups based on leaf petiole length and angle, respectively. A soybean cultivar with the shortest petiole length and smallest petiole angle was Eunhakong and cultivars with short petiole length and large petiole angle were Alchankong, Muhankong, and Pureunkong. A soybean cultivar with long petiole length and small petiole angle was Sinpaldalkong 2. Among a total of 70 Korean soybean cultivars, Eunhakong had an extreme narrow type in leaf, smallest compound leaf area, shortest petiole length, and smallest petiole angle of compound leaf.
Keywords
characteristic; canopy; mainstem; branch; leaf; peteole; Korean soybean cultivar;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Isoda A, Yoshimura T, Ishikawa T. 1994. Solar radiation penetration and distribution in soybean communities. Jpn.J.Crop Sci. 63(2):298-304   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Ariga T. 1943. Classification of soybean varieties according to plant type. Agri. and Hort. 18:69-670
3 Chang KY, KimJH, Kwon CS. 1991. Combining ability and correlation of some quantitative characters of F1 hybrids in soybeans. Korean J.Breed. 22(4):367-373
4 IBPGR. 1984. Descriptors for soybean. IBPGR Secretariat, Rome Italy. pp. 38
5 Nakamura S, Matsumoto S, Watanabe I. 1979. Comparision of characteristics between new and old soybean varieties recommended in Tohoku district. Bull. Tohoku Natl. Agric. Exp. Stn. 60:151-160
6 Ninomiya S, Cong VN. 1998. Evaluation of soybean plant shape based on tree-based models. Breeding Science 48:251-255
7 Ninomiya S, Oide M, Takahashi N. 1998. Fuzzy-Logic Search Engine for Soybean Shape Data. Jpn.J.Crop. Sci. 67:104-108   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Oide M, Morinaga S, Ninomiya S. 1996. Selection method of supervisor data set to develop neural network evaluator on soybean plant shape. J.Jass 12(10:13-20)
9 Okabe A, Kikuchi A, Satura M. 2006. Comparision of past and recently developed soybean cultivars in western region of Japan. Jpn.J.Crop Sci. 75(3):327-334   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Watanabe I. Konno S, Tabuchi K. 1975. Revised standard of examination for plant type of soybean. Proc. Crop Sci. Japan. 44(4):479-480   DOI
11 Jeong JH, Hwang YH, Kim DU. 2000. Branch related characteristics of Korean soybean varieties. Korean J.Breed. 32(1):38-44
12 Kokubun M. 1988. Design and evaluation of soybean ideotypes. Bull. Tohoku Natl. Agric. Exp. Stn. 77:77-142
13 Wells R, Schulze LL, Ashley DA, Boerma HR, Brown RH. 1982. Cultivar difference in canopy apparent photossynthesis and their relationship to seed yield in soybeans. Crop Sci. 22:886-890   DOI
14 Nakamura S, Koyama T, Watanabe I, Sasaki K. 1981. Varietal grouping of soybeans according to the branching direction and its response to planting pattern. Bull. Tohoku Natl. Agric. Exp. Stn. 65:59-71
15 Shaw RH, Weber CR. 1967. Effects of canopy arrangement on light interception and yield of soybeans. Agron.J. 59:501-505
16 Foroutan-pour K, Dutilleul P, Smith DL. 1999. Soybean canopy development as affected by population density and intercropping with corn: Fractal analysis in comparision with other quantitative approaches. Crop Sci. 39:1784-1791   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Hiebsch CK, Kanemasu ET, Nickell CD. 1976. Effects of soybean leaflet type on net carbon dioxide exchange, water use, and water use efficiency. Can.J.plant Sci. 56:455-458   DOI
18 Kokubun, M, Watanabe K. 1982. Analysis of the yielddetermining process of field-grown soybeans in relation to canpy structure. 2. Effect of plant type alteration on solar radiation interception and yield components. Jpn.J.Crop Sci. 51:51-57   DOI
19 Ambel J, Ninomiya S, Takahashi N. 1997. Fuzzy logic evaluation of soybean plant shape. Breeding Science 47:253-257
20 Pearce RB, Brown RH, Blaser RE. 1967. Photosynthesis in plant communities as influenced by leaf angle. Crop Sci. 7:321-324   DOI
21 Ninomiya S, Shigemori I. 1991. Quantitative evaluation of soybean(Glycine max L. Merr) plant shape by image analysis. Jpn.J.Breed. 41:485-497   DOI
22 Purcell LC. 2000. Soybean canopy covage and light interception measurements using digital image. Crop Sci. 40:834-837   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Blad BL, Baker DG. 1972. Orientation and distribution of leaves within soybean canopies. Agron.J. 64:26-29   DOI
24 Kokubun, M. 2001. Physiological approaches for increasing soybean yield potential. Jpn. J.Crop Sci. 70(3):341-351   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Egli DB, Pendleton Jw, Peters DB. 1970. Photosynthetic rate of three soybean communities as related to carbon dioxide levels sand solar radiation. Agron.J. 62:411-414   DOI
26 Nakamura S, Basa I, Takahashi K. 1994. Characteristcs of leaflets of soybean cultivar. Tohoku Journal of Crop Science 37:69-70
27 Wilcox JR. 2001. Sisty years of improvement in publicly developed elite soybean lines. Crop Sci. 49:1711-1716
28 Nagata T. 1950. Studies on characteristics of soybean varieties. Society of Japan soybean. Tokyo. pp 115
29 Nakaseko K. 1988. Productivity of a dwarf type soybean induced by mechanical stimulation applied during vegetative stage. Jpn.J.Crop Sci. 57:782-789   DOI
30 Silvakumar MVK. Tayler HM, Shaw RH. 1977. Top and root relations of field grown soybean. Agron.J. 69:470-473   DOI
31 Haile FJ, Higley LG, Specht JE, Spomer SM. 1998. Soybean leaf Morphology and defoliation tolerance. Agron.J. 90:353-362   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Kokubun M, Shimada S. 1994. Diurnal change of photosynthesis and its relation to yield in soybean cultivars. Jpn.J.Crop Sci. 63:305-312   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Lee, Y.H. and Huang YK. 1997. Variation of Leaflet Traits and Their Association with Agronomic Traits of Soybean Germplasm. Korean J. Crop Sci. 42(5):640-646