Browse > Article

Differences of Physiological Responses According to Growing Conditions Between Superior Family and Inferior Family in Pinus densiflora  

Oh, Chang-Young (Department of Forest Genetic Resources, Korea Forest Research Institute)
Han, Sang-Urk (Department of Forest Genetic Resources, Korea Forest Research Institute)
Kim, Chang-Soo (Department of Forest Genetic Resources, Korea Forest Research Institute)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Breeding Science / v.40, no.2, 2008 , pp. 136-142 More about this Journal
Abstract
We conducted this study to compare physiological response according to growing conditions between superior and inferior family of Pinus densiflora. In 1981, open-pollinated (OP) progenies of P. densiflora were planted in Chuncheon (CC) and Naju (NJ). We selected KW2 as a superior family and KW23 as a inferior family based on volume index among 30 OP progenies. We calculated general combining ability of each 30 OP progenies in each sites, and compared family growth rank. We collected needles of selected families in CC and NJ, and analyzed chlorophyll content, nitrated reductase (NR) activity, nitrogen content, and superoxide dismutase (SOD) acitivity. In CC, chlorophyll content and nitrogen content were more in needles of KW2 than those of KW23. In NJ, KW2 showed higher NR activity than KW23, and according to site, families in CC showed higher NR activity than those in NJ. SOD activities of both families were higher in NJ, and KW23 showed higher activity than KW2 in both sites. Consequently, inconsistency of the growth performance of two families was caused by different genetic and physiological responses.
Keywords
Pinus densiflora; progeny test; physiological response; growing condition;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Demmig-Adams B, Adams WW. 1996. Xanthophyll cycle and light stress in nature: uniform response to excess direct sunlight among higher plant species. Planta. 198: 460-470   DOI
2 Han SU, Choi WY, Chung HG, Kang KS. 1997. Standardization of the general combining ability estimated from various environments and its application to the empirical data of the open-pollinated progenies of Pinus densiflora S. et. Z. Res. Rep. For. Gen. Res. Inst. Korea. 33:47-53
3 Park YI, Chow WS, Andersn JM. 1997. Antenna size dependency of photoinactivation of photosystem II in light acclimated pea leaves. Plant Physiol. 115:151-157   DOI
4 Woolaston RR, Kanowski PJ, Nikles DG. 1991. Genotype-environment interactions in Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis in Queensland, Australia II. Family x site interactions. Silvae Genetica. 40:228-232
5 Becana M, Dalton DA, Moran JF, Iturbe-Ormaetxe I, Matamoros MA, Rubio MC. 2000. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidants in legume nodules. Physiologia Plantarum. 109:372-381   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Oh CY, Lee KJ, Lee JC, Han SH. 2004. Differences of physiological injury and antioxidative reaction among three half-sib families of Betula schmidtii to Cd treatment. Jour. Korean For. Soc. 93:428-435
7 Hikosaka K, Terashima I. 1996. Nitrogen partitioning among photosynthetic components and its consequence in sun and shade plants. Functional Ecology. 10:335-343   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Lichtenthaler HK. 1987. Chlorophylls and caotenoids : pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods in Enzymology. 148:350-382   DOI
9 Kim PG, Yi YS, Chung DJ, Woo SY, Sung JH, Lee EJ. 2001. Effects of light intensity on photosynthetic activity of shade tolerant and intolerant tree species. J. Korean For. Soc. 90:476-487
10 Han SU, Oh CY, Kim CS, Kim YJ, Kang KN, Lee SM. 2007. Time trends for genetic parameters of growth traits in open-pollinated progenies of Pinus densiflora. Korean J. Breeding Sci. 39:457-463
11 Anderson JM, Aro EM. 1994. Grana stacking and protection of photosystem II in thylakoid membranes of higher plant leaves under sustained high irradiance: a hypothesis. Photosynth. Res. 41:315-326   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Esterbauer H, Cheeseman KH. 1990. Determination of aldyhydic lipid peroxidation products: malonaldehyde and 4-hydroxynonenal. Methods in Enzymology. 186:407-421   DOI
13 Han SU. Sohn SI, Kim JH, Jhun GS. 1991. Determination of age-age correlation and optimum selection age through juvenile selection efficiency in Pinus densiflora S. et Z. Korean J. Breeding Sci. 23:139-144
14 Osmond CB. 1983. Interaction between irradiance, nitrogen nutrition, and water stress in the sun-shade responses of Solanum dulcamara. Oecologia. 57:316-321   DOI
15 Sheng Y, Podila GK, Karnosky DF. 1997. Differences in O3-induced superoxide dismutase and glutathione antioxidant expression in O3 tolerant and sensitive trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) clones. Forest Genetics. 4:25-33
16 Thompson WA, Huang LK, Kriedemann PE. 1992. Photosynthetic response to light and nutrients in sun-tolerant and shade tolerant rainforest trees. II. Leaf gas exchange and component process of photosynthesis. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology. 19:19-42   DOI
17 Asada K, Takahashi M, Nagate M. 1974. Assay and inhibitors of spinach superoxide dismutase. Agricultural Biological Chemistry. 38:471-473   DOI
18 Kim, JP, Hahn CK, Jung J. 1991. Induction of antioxygenic enzymes as defence systems in plant cells against low temperature stress:(I) Accumulation of pyruvate in cells during cold treatment and activation of antioxygenic enzymes during post-chilling period. J. Korean Agricultural Chemical Society. 34:162-167   과학기술학회마을
19 Retzlaff WA, Handest JA, O'Malley DM, McKeand SE, Topa MA. 2001. Whole-tree biomass and carbon allocation of juvenile trees of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda): influence of genetics and fertilization. Can. J. For. Res. 31:960-970   DOI
20 Zobel B, Talbert J. 1984. Applied Forest Tree Improvement. John Wiley & Sons. New York. pp. 505
21 Gwaze DP, Bridgwater FE, Byram TD, Woolliams JA, Williams CG. 2000. Predicting age-age genetic correlations in tree-breeding programs: a case study of Pinus taeda L. Theoretical Applied Genetics. 100:199-206   DOI
22 Hogberg P, Granström A, Johansson T, Lundmark-Thelin A, Näsholm T. 1986. Plant nitrate reductase activity as an indicator of availability of nitrate in forest soils. Can. J. For. Res. 16:1165-1169   DOI
23 Zas R, Merlo E, Fern󰐁ndez-López J. 2004. Juvenile - mature genetic correlations in Pinus pinaster Ait. under different nutrient x water regimes. Silvae Genetica. 53: 124-129   DOI
24 Hikosaka K. 1996. Effects of leaf age, nitrogen nutrition and photon flux density on the organization of the photosynthetic apparatus in leaves of a vine (Ipomoea tricolor Cav.) grown horizontally to avoid mutual shading of leaves. Planta. 198:144-150
25 Korea Forest Service. 2005. Statistical Yearbook of Forestry. 35
26 Salt DE. 2001. Responses and adaptations of plants to metal stress. pp. 159-179. In: M.J. Hawkesford, ed. Molecular Analysis of Plant Adaptations to the Environment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
27 Wei RP, Lidgren D. 2001. Optimum breeding generation interval considering build-up of relatedness. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 31:722-729   DOI
28 Namkoong G, Snyder EB, Stonecypher RW. 1966. Heritability and gain concepts for evaluating breeding systems such as seedling seed orchards. Silvae Genetica. 15:76-84
29 Oh CY, Han SH, Kim YY, Lee JC. 2005. Changes of drought tolerance and photosynthetic characteristics of Populus davidiana Dode according to PEG concentration. Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 7:296-302