Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.18.8239

Human Papillomavirus E6 Knockdown Restores Adenovirus Mediated-estrogen Response Element Linked p53 Gene Transfer in HeLa Cells  

Kajitani, Koji (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka City General Hospital)
Ken-Ichi, Honda (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kashiwara Municipal Hospital)
Terada, Hiroyuki (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kashiwara Municipal Hospital)
Yasui, Tomoyo (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine)
Sumi, Toshiyuki (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine)
Koyama, Masayasu (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine)
Ishiko, Osamu (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine)
Publication Information
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention / v.16, no.18, 2016 , pp. 8239-8245 More about this Journal
Abstract
The p53 gene is inactivated by the human papillomavirus (HPV) E6 protein in the majority of cervical cancers. Treatment of HeLa S3 cells with siRNA for HPV E6 permitted adenovirus-mediated transduction of a p53 gene linked to an upstream estrogen response element (ERE). Our previous study in non-siRNA treated HHUA cells, which are derived from an endometrial cancer and express estrogen receptor ${\beta}$, showed enhancing effects of an upstream ERE on adenovirus-mediated p53 gene transduction. In HeLa S3 cells treated with siRNA for HPV E6, adenovirus-mediated transduction was enhanced by an upstream ERE linked to a p53 gene carrying a proline variant at codon 72, but not for a p53 gene with arginine variant at codon 72. Expression levels of p53 mRNA and Coxsackie/adenovirus receptor (CAR) mRNA after adenovirus-mediated transfer of an ERE-linked p53 gene (proline variant at codon 72) were higher compared with those after non-ERE-linked p53 gene transfer in siRNA-treated HeLa S3 cells. Western blot analysis showed lower ${\beta}$-tubulin levels and comparatively higher p53/${\beta}$-tubulin or CAR/${\beta}$-tubulin ratios in siRNA-treated HeLa S3 cells after adenovirus-mediated ERE-linked p53 gene (proline variant at codon 72) transfer compared with those in non-siRNA-treated cells. Apoptosis, as measured by annexin V binding, was higher after adenovirus-mediated ERE-linked p53 gene (proline variant at codon 72) transfer compared with that after non-ERE-linked p53 gene transfer in siRNA-treated cells.
Keywords
Adenovirus mediated transduction; codon 72 polymorphism; p53; siRNA;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Zhi X, Honda K, Sumi T, et al (2007). Esyradiol-17beta regulates vascular endothelial growth factor and Bcl-2 expression in HHUA cells. Int J Oncol, 31, 1333-8
2 Adhim Z, Otsuki N, Kitamoto J, et al (2013). Gene silencing with siRNA targeting E6/E7 as a therapeutic intervention against head and neck cancer-containing HPV16 cell lines. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 133, 761-71.   DOI
3 Allgood VE, Cidlowski JA (1992). Vitamine B6 modulates transcriptional activation by multiple members of the steroid hormone receptor superfamily. J Biol Chem, 267, 3819-24.
4 Andersson S, Rylander E, Strand A, et al (2001). The significance of p53codon 72 polymorphism for the development of cervical adenocarcinomas. Br J Cancer, 85, 1153-6.   DOI
5 Bergamaschi D, Samuels Y, Sullivan A, et al (2006). iASPP preferentially binds p53 proline-rich region and modulates apoptotic function of codon 72-polymorphic p53. Nat Genet, 38, 1133-41.   DOI
6 Blagosklonny MV (1997). Loss of function and p53 protein stabilization. Oncogene, 15, 1889-93.   DOI
7 Chen G, Zhang S, He X, et al (2014). Clinical utility of recombinant adenoviral human p53 gene therapy: current perspectives. OncoTargets Therapy, 7, 1901-9.
8 Drewinko B, Yang LY, Leibovitz A, et al (1984). Cellular discriminants for a biological classification of human colon carcinoma. Cancer Res, 44, 4241-53.
9 Feng Z, Zhang C, Kang H-J, et al (2011). Regulation of female reproduction by p53 and its family members. FASEB J, 25, 2245-55.   DOI
10 Habbous S, Pang V, Eng L, et al (2012). p53Arg72Pro polymorphism, HPV status and initiation progression and development of cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Cancer Res, 18, 6407-15.   DOI
11 Hougardy BMT, Maduro JH, van der Zee ADJ, et al (2006). Proteasome inhibitor MG132 sensitizes HPV-positive human cervical cancer cells to rhTRAIL-induced apoptosis. Int J Cancer, 118, 1892-900.   DOI
12 Ishiwata I, Ishiwata C, Soma M, et al (1984). Establish01ment of human endometrial adenocarcinoma cell line containing estradiol-17beta and progesterone receptors. Gynecol Oncol, 17, 281-90.   DOI
13 Jeong BS, Hu W, Belyi V, et al (2010). Differential levels of transcription of p53-regulated genes by the arginine/ proline polymorphism: p53 with arginine at codon 72 favors apoptosis. FASEB J, 24, 1347-53.   DOI
14 Kajitani K, Honda K, Terada H, et al (2012). Estrogen response element enhances adenovirus-mediated transfer of the p53 gene according to codon 72 polymorphisms and cellular estrogen receptor expression. J Cancer Ther Res, 31, 1-8.
15 Klinge CM (2001). Estrogen receptor interaction with estrogen response elements. Nucleic Acids Res, 29, 2905-19.   DOI
16 Klug SJ, Ressing M, Koenig J, et al (2009). TP53 codon 72 polymorphism and cervical cancer: a pooled analysis of individual data from 49 studies. Lancet Oncol, 10, 772-84.   DOI
17 Kumar NS, Richer J, Owen G, et al (1998). Selective downregulation of progesterone receptor isoform B in poorly differentiated human endometrial cancer cells: Implications for unopposed estrogen action. Cancer Res, 58, 1860-5.
18 Li X, Li Y, Hu Z, et al (2013). Plasmid-based E6-specific siRNA and co-expressioin of wild type p53 suppresses the growth of cervical cancer in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Lett, 335, 242-50.   DOI
19 Kuner R, Vogt M, Sultmann H, et al (2007). Identification of cellular targets for the human papillomavirus E6 and E7 oncogenes by RNA interference and transcriptome analyses. J Mol Med, 85, 1253-62.   DOI
20 Kruse JP, Gu W (2009). Modes of p53 regulation. Cell, 137, 609-22.   DOI
21 Liu G, Xia T, Chen X (2003). The activation domains, the proline-rich domain, and the C-terminal basic domain in p53 are necessary for acetylation of histones on the proximal p21 promoter and interaction with p300/CREB-binding protein. J Biol Chem, 278, 17557-65.   DOI
22 Menendez D, Inga A, Resnick MA (2010). Potentiating the p53 network. Discov Med, 10, 94-100.
23 Nunobiki O, Ueda M, Toji E, et al (2011). Genetic polymorphism of cancer susceptibility genes and HPV infection in cervical carcinogenesis. SAGE-Hindawi Access Res Pathol Res Int.
24 Scheffner M, Werness BA, Huibregtse JM, et al (1990). The E6 oncoprotein encoded by human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 promotes the degradation of p53. Cell, 63, 1129-36.   DOI
25 Storey A, Thomas M, Kalita A, et al (1998). Role of a p53 polymorphism in the development of human papillomavirusassociated cancer. Nature, 393, 229-34   DOI
26 Tan S, Hougardy BMT, Meersma GJ, et al (2012). Human papilloma virus 16 E6 RNA interference enhances cisplatin and death receptor-mediated apoptosis in human cervical carcinoma cells. Mol Parmacol, 81, 701-9.
27 Trigiante G, Lu X(2006). ASPPs and cancer. Nat Rev, 6, 217-26.   DOI