Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.9.3773

Establishing a Nomogram for Stage IA-IIB Cervical Cancer Patients after Complete Resection  

Zhou, Hang (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital)
Li, Xiong (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital)
Zhang, Yuan (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology)
Jia, Yao (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital)
Hu, Ting (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital)
Yang, Ru (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital)
Huang, Ke-Cheng (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital)
Chen, Zhi-Lan (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital)
Wang, Shao-Shuai (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital)
Tang, Fang-Xu (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital)
Zhou, Jin (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital)
Chen, Yi-Le (Department of Gynecologic Neoplasms, Hunan Province Tumor Hospital, The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Central South University)
Wu, Li (Department of Gynecologic Neoplasms, Hunan Province Tumor Hospital, The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Central South University)
Han, Xiao-Bing (The First Affiliated Hospital, Medical School of Xi'an Jiaotong University)
Lin, Zhong-Qiu (The Second Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University)
Lu, Xiao-Mei (The Second Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University)
Xing, Hui (Xiangyang Central Hospital, First Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Arts and Science)
Qu, Peng-Peng (Tianjin Central Hospital for Gynecology and Obstetrics)
Cai, Hong-Bing (Zhong Nan Hospital, Wuhan University)
Song, Xiao-Jie (Commercial Vocational Hospital)
Tian, Xiao-Yu (The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology)
Zhang, Qing-Hua (The Central Hospital of Wuhan)
Shen, Jian (The Central Hospital of Wuhan)
Liu, Dan (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital)
Wang, Ze-Hua (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology)
Xu, Hong-Bing (Shenzhen People's Hospital, the Second Clinical Hospital of Jinan University)
Wang, Chang-Yu (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital)
Xi, Ling (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital)
Deng, Dong-Rui (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital)
Wang, Hui (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital)
Lv, Wei-Guo (Women's Reproductive Health Laboratory of Zhejiang Province)
Shen, Keng (Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College)
Wang, Shi-Xuan (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital)
Xie, Xing (Women's Reproductive Health Laboratory of Zhejiang Province)
Cheng, Xiao-Dong (Women's Reproductive Health Laboratory of Zhejiang Province)
Ma, Ding (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital)
Li, Shuang (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tongji Hospital)
Publication Information
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention / v.16, no.9, 2015 , pp. 3773-3777 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to establish a nomogram by combining clinicopathologic factors with overall survival of stage IA-IIB cervical cancer patients after complete resection with pelvic lymphadenectomy. Materials and Methods: This nomogram was based on a retrospective study on 1,563 stage IA-IIB cervical cancer patients who underwent complete resection and lymphadenectomy from 2002 to 2008. The nomogram was constructed based on multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazard regression. The accuracy and discriminative ability of the nomogram were measured by concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve. Results: Multivariate analysis identified lymph node metastasis (LNM), lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI), stromal invasion, parametrial invasion, tumor diameter and histology as independent prognostic factors associated with cervical cancer survival. These factors were selected for construction of the nomogram. The C-index of the nomogram was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.65 to 0.77), and calibration of the nomogram showed good agreement between the 5-year predicted survival and the actual observation. Conclusions: We developed a nomogram predicting 5-year overall survival of surgically treated stage IA-IIB cervical cancer patients. More comprehensive information that is provided by this nomogram could provide further insight into personalized therapy selection.
Keywords
Cervical cancer; nomogram; clinicopathologic factor;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Bochner BH, Kattan MW, Vora KC (2006). Postoperative nomogram predicting risk of recurrence after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol, 24, 3967-72.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Chang SJ, Kim WY, Yoo SC, et al (2009). A validation study of new risk grouping criteria for postoperative treatment in stage IB cervical cancers without high-risk factors: rethinking the gynecologic oncology group criteria. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 147, 91-6.   DOI
3 Creasman WT, Kohler MF (2004). Is lymph vascular space involvement an independent prognostic factor in early cervical cancer? Gynecol Oncol, 92, 525-9.   DOI
4 Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, et al (2010). Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer, 127, 2893-917.   DOI
5 Grochola LF, Greither T, Taubert H, et al (2008). The stem cell-associated Hiwi gene in human adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: expression and risk of tumour-related death. Br J Cancer, 99, 1083-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Han DS, Suh YS, Kong SH, et al (2012). Nomogram predicting long-term survival after d2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol, 30, 3834-40.   DOI
7 Harrell FE, Jr., Lee KL, Mark DB (1996). Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med, 15, 361-87.   DOI
8 Harrell FE Jr (2001). Regression modeling strategies with applications to linear models LR, and survival analysis, volume 19. New York, NY, Springer-Verlag.
9 Ho CM, Chien TY, Huang SH, et al (2004). Multivariate analysis of the prognostic factors and outcomes in early cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol, 93, 458-64.   DOI
10 Hricak H, Gatsonis C, Chi DS, et al (2005). Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American college of radiology imaging network 6651-gynecologic oncology group 183. J Clin Oncol, 23, 9329-37.   DOI
11 Hu T, Li S, Chen Y, et al (2012). Matched-case comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with FIGO stage IB1-IIB cervical cancer to establish selection criteria. Eur J Cancer, 48, 2353-60.   DOI
12 Kamura T, Tsukamoto N, Tsuruchi N, et al (1992). Multivariate analysis of the histopathologic prognostic factors of cervical cancer in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy. Cancer, 69, 181-6.   DOI
13 Hu T, Wu L, Xing H, et al (2013). Development of criteria for ovarian preservation in cervical cancer patients treated with radical surgery with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a multicenter retrospective study and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol, 20, 881-90.   DOI
14 Huitzil-Melendez FD, Capanu M, O'Reilly EM, et al (2010). Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: which staging systems best predict prognosis? J Clin Oncol, 28, 2889-95.   DOI
15 Iasonos A, Schrag D, Raj GV, et al (2008). How to build and interpret a nomogram for cancer prognosis. J Clin Oncol, 26, 1364-70.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Kang S, Nam BH, Park JY, et al (2012). Risk assessment tool for distant recurrence after platinum-based concurrent chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: a Korean gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol, 30, 2369-74.   DOI
17 Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A, et al (1997). Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Lancet, 350, 535-40.   DOI
18 Nguyen TL, Nguyen DC, Nguyen TH, et al (2011). Survey-based cancer mortality in the Lao PDR, 2007-08. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 12, 2495-8.
19 Pecorelli S, Zigliani L, Odicino F (2009). Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 105, 107-8.   DOI
20 Singh P, Tripcony L, Nicklin J (2012). Analysis of prognostic variables, development of predictive models, and stratification of risk groups in surgically treated FIGO early-stage (IA-IIA) carcinoma cervix. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 22, 115-22.   DOI
21 Waggoner SE (2003). Cervical cancer. Lancet, 361, 2217-25.   DOI
22 Small W, Jr., Strauss JB, Jhingran A, et al (2012). ACR appropriateness criteria(R) definitive therapy for early-stage cervical cancer. Am J Clin Oncol, 35, 399-405.   DOI
23 Sternberg CN (2006). Are nomograms better than currently available stage groupings for bladder cancer? J Clin Oncol, 24, 3819-20.   DOI
24 Tseng JY, Yen MS, Twu NF, et al (2010). Prognostic nomogram for overall survival in stage IIB-IVA cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 202, 174 e1-7.   DOI
25 Walz J, Gallina A, Saad F, et al (2007). A nomogram predicting 10-year life expectancy in candidates for radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol, 25, 3576-81.   DOI
26 Wang Y, Li J, Xia Y, et al (2013). Prognostic nomogram for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after partial hepatectomy. J Clin Oncol, 31, 1188-95.   DOI
27 Williams NL, Werner TL, Jarboe EA, et al (2015). Adenocarcinoma of the cervix: should we treat it differently? Curr Oncol Rep, 17, 440.
28 Yuan CC, Wang PH, Lai CR, et al (1998). Prognosis-predicting system based on factors related to survival of cervical carcinoma. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 63, 163-7.   DOI   ScienceOn