Does Cervical Screening in Young Women Aged 20-25 Years Lead to Unnecessary and Harmful Interventions? |
Al-Kalbani, Moza
(Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital)
Price, John (Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust) Thompson, Gwen (Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust) Ahmad, Sarfraz (Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Florida Hospital Cancer Institute) Nagar, Hans (Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust) |
1 | Sasieni P, Castanon A, Cuzick J (2009). Effectiveness of cervical screening with age: Population based case-control study of prospectively recorded data. Br Med J, 339, 2968. DOI |
2 | Sjoborg KD, Vistad I, Myhr SS, et al (2007). Pregnancy outcome after cervical cone excision: A case control study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 86, 423-8. DOI |
3 | Tan L, Pepra E, Haloob RK (2004). The outcome of pregnancy after large loop excision of the transformation zone of the cervix. J Obstet Gynaecol, 24, 25-7. DOI |
4 | Thaxton L, Waxman AG (2015). Cervical cancer prevention: Immunization and screening 2015. Med Clin North Am, 99, 469-77. DOI |
5 | Yang B, Morrell S, Zuo Y, et al (2008). A case-control study of the protective benefit of cervical screening against invasive cervical cancer in NSW women. Cancer Causes Control, 19, 569-76. DOI |
6 | Zappa M, Visioli CB, Ciatto S, et al (2004). Lower protection of cytological screening for adenocarcinomas and shorter protection for younger women: The results of a case-control study in Florence. Br J Cancer, 90, 1784-6. |
7 | Demirtas B (2013). Review of strategies in promoting attendance for cervical screening. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 3263-7. DOI ScienceOn |
8 | Ferenczy A, Choukroun D, Falcone T, Franco E (1995). The effect of cervical loop electrosurgical excision on subsequent pregnancy outcome: North American Experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 172, 1246-50. DOI |
9 | Fiander AN (2008). Cervical screening in young women aged 20-24 years. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care, 34, 19. DOI |
10 | Gray NM, Sharp L, Cotton SC, et al (2006). Psychological effects of a low-grade abnormal cervical smear test result: Anxiety and associated factors. Br J Cancer, 94, 1253-62. DOI |
11 | Herbert A, Holdsworth G, Kubba AA (2008). Cervical screening: Why young women should be encouraged to be screened. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care, 34, 21-5. DOI |
12 | Moscicki AB, Shiboski S, Hills N, et al (2004). Regression of low-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions in young women. Lancet, 364, 1678-83. DOI |
13 | Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, et al (2006). Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet, 367, 489-98. DOI |
14 | Leyden WA, Manos MM, Geiger AM, at al (2005). Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: Attributable factors in the screening process. J Natl Cancer Inst, 97, 675-83. DOI |
15 | Luesley D, Leeson S (2010). Colposcopy and programme management: guidelines for the nhs cervical screening programme. NHS Cancer Screening Programmes (NHSCSP Publication No. 20). |
16 | Nalliah S, Karikalan B, Kademane K (2015). Multifaceted usage of HPV related tests and products in the management of cervical cancer - a review. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 16, 2145-50. DOI |
17 | Rieck GC, Tristram A, Hauke A, et al (2006). Cervical screening in 20-24 year olds. J Med Screen, 13, 64-71. DOI |
18 | Sadler L, Saftlas A, Wang W, et al (2004). Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery. JAMA, 291, 2100-6. DOI |
19 | Sasieni P, Adams J, Cuzick J (2003). Benefit of cervical screening at different ages: Evidence from the UK audit of screening histories. Br J Cancer, 89, 88-93. DOI |
20 | Sasieni P, Castanon A (2006). Call and recall cervical screening programme: Screening interval and age limits. Curr Diagnost Pathol, 12, 114-26. DOI |
![]() |