Accuracy of Combined Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid and Cervical Cytology Testing as a Primary Screening Tool for Cervical Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
Chanthavilay, Phetsavanh
(Faculty of Postgraduate Studies, University of Health Sciences)
Mayxay, Mayfong (Faculty of Postgraduate Studies, University of Health Sciences) Phongsavan, Keokedthong (Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Setthathirath Hospital) Marsden, Donald E (Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Setthathirath Hospital) White, Lisa J (Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University) Moore, Lynne (Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University) Reinharz, Daniel (Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University) |
1 | Arbyn M, Sankaranarayanan R, Muwonge R, et al (2008). Pooled analysis of the accuracy of five cervical cancer screening tests assessed in eleven studies in Africa and India. Int J Cancer, 123, 153-60. DOI |
2 | Bossuyt P, Davenport C, Deeks J, et al (2013). Chapter 11 Interpreting results and drawing conclusions. In 'Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy version 9', Eds The Cochrane Collaboration, |
3 | Chen C, Yang Z, Li Z, et al (2012). Accuracy of several cervical screening strategies for early detection of cervical cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 22, 908-21. DOI ScienceOn |
4 | Consul S, Agrawal A, Sharma H, et al (2012). Comparative study of effectiveness of Pap smear versus visual inspection with acetic acid and visual inspection with Lugol's iodine for mass screening of premalignant and malignant lesion of cervix. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol, 33, 161-5. DOI |
5 | de Groot JA, Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, et al (2011). Verification problems in diagnostic accuracy studies: consequences and solutions. BMJ, 343, 4770. DOI |
6 | Deeks JJ, Bossuyt PM, Gatsonis C 2010. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy version 1.0.0., The Cochrane Collaboration. |
7 | Denny L, Quinn M, Sankaranarayanan R (2006). Chapter 8: Screening for cervical cancer in developing countries. Vaccine, 24, 71-7. DOI ScienceOn |
8 | Echelman D, Feldman S (2012). Management of cervical precancers: a global perspective. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am, 26, 31-44. DOI |
9 | Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al (2014). Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer, 136, 359-86. |
10 | FIGO (2009). Global Guidance for Cervical Cancer Prevention and Control. |
11 | Harbord RM, Whiting P (2009). metandi: Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy using hierarchical logistic regression. Stata J, 9, 211-29. |
12 | Jacob M (2009). HPV Vaccines: Characteristics, target population and safety. in 'global guidance for cervical cancer prevention and control', Eds International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 15-9 |
13 | Kay M (2013). Screening with acetic acid could prevent 22 000 deaths from cervical cancer in India every year. BMJ, 346, 3935. DOI |
14 | Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and metaanalyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol, 62, 1-34. DOI ScienceOn |
15 | Macaskill P, Gatsonis C, Deeks JJ, et al (2010). Chapter 10: analysing and presenting results. In 'Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy', Eds The Cochrane Collaboration, |
16 | Mitchell MF, Schottenfeld D, Tortolero-Luna G, et al (1998). Colposcopy for the diagnosis of squamous intraepithelial lesions: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol, 91, 626-31. DOI |
17 | Nanda K, McCrory DC, Myers ER, et al (2000). Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med, 132, 810-9. DOI |
18 | Saslow D, Solomon D, Lawson HW, et al (2012). American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer. CA Cancer J Clin, 62, 147-72. DOI ScienceOn |
19 | Naucler P, Ryd W, Tornberg S, et al (2009). Efficacy of HPV DNA testing with cytology triage and/or repeat HPV DNA testing in primary cervical cancer screening. J Natl Cancer Inst, 101, 88-99. DOI |
20 | Sankaranarayanan R, Thara S, Sharma A, et al (2004). Accuracy of conventional cytology: results from a multicentre screening study in India. J Med Screen, 11, 77-84. DOI |
21 | Sauvaget C, Fayette JM, Muwonge R, et al (2011). Accuracy of visual inspection with acetic acid for cervical cancer screening. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 113, 14-24. DOI |
22 | Sherris J, Wittet S, Kleine A, et al (2009). Evidence-based, alternative cervical cancer screening approaches in lowresource settings. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health, 35, 147-54. DOI |
23 | Sideri M, Schettino F, Spinaci L, et al (1995). Operator variability in disease detection and grading by colposcopy in patients with mild dysplastic smears. Cancer, 76, 1601-5. DOI |
24 | Vedantham H, Silver MI, Kalpana B, et al (2010). Determinants of VIA (Visual Inspection of the Cervix After Acetic Acid Application) positivity in cervical cancer screening of women in a peri-urban area in Andhra Pradesh, India. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 19, 1373-80. DOI |
25 | Vesco KK, Whitlock EP, Eder M, et al 2011. Screening for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, Rockville MD. |
26 | World Bank (2014). Country and lending groups. |
27 | Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, et al (2011). QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med, 155, 529-36. DOI ScienceOn |
![]() |