Effect of Screening on Variation in Cervical Cancer Survival by Socioeconomic Determinants - a Study from Rural South India |
Thulaseedharan, Jissa Vinoda
(Achutha Menon Centre for Health Science Studies (AMCHSS), Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology (SCTIMST))
Malila, Nea (School of Health Sciences (HES), University of Tampere) Swaminathan, Rajaraman (Cancer Institute (WIA)) Esmy, Pulikottil Okuru (Christian Fellowship Community Health Centre (CFCHC)) Cherian, Mary (Christian Fellowship Community Health Centre (CFCHC)) Hakama, Matti (School of Health Sciences (HES), University of Tampere) Muwonge, Richard (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)) Sankaranarayanan, Rengaswamy (International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)) |
1 | von Wagner C, Good A, Whitaker KL, Wardle J (2011). Psychosocial determinants of socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening participation: a conceptual framework. Epidemiol Rev, 33, 135-47. DOI |
2 | Welch HG, Black WC (2010). Overdiagnosis in cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst, 102, 605-13. DOI |
3 | Coker AL, Du XL, Fang S, Eggleston KS (2006). Socioeconomic status and cervical cancer survival among older women: findings from the SEER-Medicare linked data cohorts. Gynecol Oncol, 102, 278-84. DOI |
4 | Elit L (2014). Cervical cancer in the older woman. Maturitas, 78, 160-7. DOI |
5 | Global cancer facts and figures (2012), 2nd edition. Atlanta, Georgia: American Cancer Society.Availableat:www. cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@epidemiologysurveilance/documents/document/acspc-027766.pdf |
6 | Gulati R, Tsodikov A, Etzioni R, et al (2014). Expected population impacts of discontinued prostate-specific antigen screening. Cancer, 120, 3519-26. DOI |
7 | Munagala R, Rai SN, Ganesharajah S, et al (2010). Clinicopathological, but not socio-demographic factors affect the prognosis in cervical carcinoma. Oncol Rep, 24, 511-20. |
8 | Sankaranarayanan R, Nair MK, Jayaprakash PG, et al (1995). Cervical cancer in Kerala: a hospital registry-based study on survival and prognostic factors. Br J Cancer, 72, 1039-42. DOI |
9 | Nandakumar A, Anantha N, Venugopal TC (1995). Incidence, mortality and survival in cancer of the cervix in Bangalore, India. Br J Cancer, 71, 1348-52. DOI |
10 | Sankaranarayanan R, Esmy PO, Rajkumar R, et al (2007a). Effect of visual screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Tamil Nadu, India: a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet, 370, 398-406. DOI |
11 | Sankaranarayanan R, Rajkumar R, Arrossi S, et al (2003) . Determinants of participation of women in a cervical cancer visual screening trial in rural south India. Cancer Detect Prev, 27, 457-65. DOI |
12 | Sankaranarayanan R, Rajkumar R, Esmy PO,et al (2007b). Effectiveness, safety and acceptability of 'see and treat' with cryotherapy by nurses in a cervical screening study in India. Br J Cancer, 96, 738-43. DOI |
13 | Sankaranarayanan R, Swaminathan R, Brenner H, et al (2010). Cancer survival in Africa, Asia, and Central America: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol, 11, 165-73. DOI |
14 | Sankila R, Demaret E, Hakama M, et al (eds) (2000). Evaluation and monitoring of screening programmes. Brussels, Luxembourg: European Commission. |
15 | Schrijvers CT, Mackenbach JP (1994). Cancer patient survival by socioeconomic status in seven countries: a review for six common cancer sites [corrected]. J Epidemiol Community Health, 48, 441-6. DOI |
16 | Thulaseedharan JV, Malila N, Hakama M, et al (2013). Effect of screening on the risk estimates of socio demographic factors on cervical cancer-a large cohort study from rural India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 589-94. DOI |