Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.3.1481

A Breast Cancer Nomogram for Prediction of Non-Sentinel Node Metastasis - Validation of Fourteen Existing Models  

Koca, Bulent (General Surgery, Korgan Devlet Hastanesi)
Kuru, Bekir (Department of General Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis University School of Medicine)
Ozen, Necati (Department of General Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis University School of Medicine)
Yoruker, Savas (Department of General Surgery, Ondokuz Mayis University School of Medicine)
Bek, Yuksel (Department of Biostatistics and Medical Information, Ondokuz Mayis University School of Medicine)
Publication Information
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention / v.15, no.3, 2014 , pp. 1481-1488 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: To avoid performing axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for non-sentinel lymph node (SLN)-negative patients with-SLN positive axilla, nomograms for predicting the status have been developed in many centers. We created a new nomogram predicting non-SLN metastasis in SLN-positive patients with invasive breast cancer and evaluated 14 existing breast cancer models in our patient group. Materials and Methods: Two hundred and thirty seven invasive breast cancer patients with SLN metastases who underwent ALND were included in the study. Based on independent predictive factors for non-SLN metastasis identified by logistic regression analysis, we developed a new nomogram. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves for the models were created and the areas under the curves (AUC) were computed. Results: In a multivariate analysis, tumor size, presence of lymphovascular invasion, extranodal extension of SLN, large size of metastatic SLN, the number of negative SLNs, and multifocality were found to be independent predictive factors for non-SLN metastasis. The AUC was found to be 0.87, and calibration was good for the present Ondokuz Mayis nomogram. Among the 14 validated models, the MSKCC, Stanford, Turkish, MD Anderson, MOU (Masaryk), Ljubljana, and DEU models yielded excellent AUC values of > 0.80. Conclusions: We present a new model to predict the likelihood of non-SLN metastasis. Each clinic should determine and use the most suitable nomogram or should create their own nomograms for the prediction of non- SLN metastasis.
Keywords
Breast cancer nomogram; non-sentinel node metastasis; nomogram for non-SLN metastasis;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Ponzone R, Maggiorotto F, Mariani L, et al (2007). Comparison of two models for the prediction of nonsentinel node metastases in breast cancer. Am J Surg, 193, 686-92.   DOI
2 Van Zee KJ, Manasseh DM, Bevilacqua JL, et al (2003). A nomogram for predicting the likelihood of additional nodal metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol, 10, 1140-51.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Zakaria S, Pantvaidya G, Reynolds CA, et al (2008). Sentinel node positive breast cancer patients who do not undergo axillary dissection: are they different? Surgery, 143, 641-7.   DOI
4 Zhu L, Jin L, Li S, et al (2013). Which nomogram is best for predicting non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients? A meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 137, 783-95.   DOI
5 Perhavec A, Perme MP, Hocevar M, Besic N, Zgajnar J (2010). Ljubljana nomograms for predicting the likelihood of nonsentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 119, 357-66.   DOI
6 Poirier E, Sideris L, Dube P, Drolet P, Meterissian SH (2008). Analysis of clinical applicability of the breast cancer nomogram for positive sentinel lymph node: the canadian experience. Ann Surg Oncol, 15, 2562-7.   DOI
7 Sasada T, Kataoka T, Shigematsu H, et al (2013). Three models for predicting the risk of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in Japanese breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer, [Epub ahead of print].
8 Scow JS, Degnim AC, Hoskin TL, Reynolds C, Boughey JC (2009). Assessment of the performance of the Stanford Online Calculator for the prediction of nonsentinel lymph node metastasis in sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer patients. Cancer, 115, 4064-70.   DOI
9 Smidt ML, Kuster DM, van der Wilt GJ, Thunnissen FB, Van Zee KJ, Strobbe LJ (2005). Can the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center nomogram predict the likelihood of nonsentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients in theNetherlands? Ann Surg Oncol, 12, 1066-72.   DOI
10 Soni NK, Carmalt HL, Gillett DJ, Spillane AJ (2005). Evaluation of a breast cancer nomogram for prediction of non-sentinel lymph node positivity. Eur J Sur Oncol, 31, 958-64.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Tan EY, Ho B, Chen JJ, et al (2011). Predictors of nonsentinel nodal involvement to aid intraoperative decision making in breast cancer patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes. ISRN Oncol, 2011, 539503.
12 Mittendorf EA, Hunt KK, Boughey JC, et al (2012). Incorporation of sentinel lymph node metastasis size into a nomogram predicting nonsentinel lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node. Ann Surg, 255, 109-15.   DOI
13 Lambert LA, Ayers GD, Hwang RF, et al (2006). Validation of a breast cancer nomogram for predicting nonsentinel lymph node metastases after a positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol, 13, 310-20.   DOI
14 Lombardi A, Maggi S, Lo Russo M, et al (2011). Non-sentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel lymph node: validation of five nomograms and development of a new predictive model. Tumori, 97, 749-55.
15 Pal A, Provenzano E, Duffy SW, et al (2008). A model for predicting non-sentinel lymph node metastatic disease when the sentinel lymph node is positive. Br J Surg, 95, 302-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Meretoja TJ, Leidenius MH, Heikkila PS, et al (2012). International multicenter tool to predict the risk of nonsentinel node metastases in breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst, 104, 1888-96.   DOI
17 Moghaddam Y, Falzon M, Fulford L, Williams NR, Keshtgar MR (2010). Comparison of three mathematical models for predicting the risk of additional axillary nodal metastases after positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in early breast cancer. Br J Surg, 97, 1646-52.   DOI
18 Morrow M (2009). Patterns of care with a positive sentinel node: echoes of an opportunity missed. Ann Surg Oncol, 16, 2429-30.   DOI
19 Park J, Fey JV, Naik AM, Borgen PI, Van Zee KJ, Cody HS 3rd (2007). A declining rate of completion axillary dissection in sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer patients is associated with the use of a multivariate nomogram. Ann Surg, 245, 462-8.   DOI
20 Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000). Applied Logistic Regression. 2nd edition. New York, NY: John Wiley.
21 Hanley JA, McNeil BJ (1982). The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143, 29-36.   DOI
22 Hessman CJ, Naik AM, Kearney NM, et al (2011). Comparative validation of online nomograms for predicting nonsentinel lymph node status in sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer. Arch Surg, 146, 1035-40.   DOI
23 Hidar S, Harrabi I, Benregaya L, et al (2011). Validation of nomograms to predict the risk of nonsentinels lymph node metastases in North African Tunisian breast cancer patients with sentinel node involvement. Breast, 20, 26-30.   DOI
24 Kocsis L, Svebis M, Boross G, Sinko M, et al (2004). Use and limitations of a nomogram predicting the likelihood of non-sentinel node involvement after a positive sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer patients. Am Surg, 70, 1019-24.
25 Kell MR, Burke JP, Barry M, et al (2010). Outcome of axillary staging in early breast cancer: a metaanalysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 120, 441-447.   DOI
26 Klar M, Jochmann A, Foeldi M, et al (2008). The MSKCC nomogram for prediction the likelihood of non-sentinel node involvement in a German breast cancer population. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 112, 523-31.   DOI
27 Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE, Nizam A (1998). Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. 3rd ed. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury Press.
28 Kohrt HE, Olshen RA, Bermas HR, et al (2008). New models and online calculator for predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer patients. BMC Cancer, 8, 66.   DOI
29 Cho J, Han W, Lee JW, et al (2008). A scoring system to predict nonsentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with metastatic sentinel lymph nodes: a comparison with other scoring systems. Ann Surg Oncol, 15, 2278-86.   DOI
30 Coutant C, Rouzier R, Fondrinier E, et al (2009). Validation of the Tenon breast cancer score for predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node metastasis: a prospective multicenter study. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 113, 537-43.   DOI
31 Coufal O, Pavlik T, Fabian, et al (2009). Predicting non-sentinel lymph node status after positive sentinel biopsy in breast cancer: what model performs the best in a Czech population? Pathol Oncol Res, 15, 733-40.   DOI
32 Coutant C, Olivier C, Lambaudie E, et al (2009). Comparison of models to predict nonsentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with metastatic sentinel lymph nodes: a prospective multicenter study. J Clin Oncol, 27, 2800-8.   DOI
33 Degnim AC, Reynolds C, Pantvaidya G, et al (2005). Nonsentinel node metastasis in breast cancer patients: assessment of an existing and a new predictive nomogram. Am J Surg, 190, 543-50.   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Derici S, Sevinc A, Harmancioglu O, et al (2012). Validation of three breast cancer nomograms and a new formula for predicting non-sentinel lymph node status. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 13, 6181-5.   과학기술학회마을   DOI
35 Barranger E, Morel O, Coutant C (2009). Axilla scoring systems predicting risk of non-sentinel-node metastasis in breast cancer patients with a positive sentinel node. Ann Surg Oncol, 15, 1261-2.
36 Giuliano AE, McCall L, Beitsch P, et al (2010). Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial. Ann Surg, 252, 426-32.
37 Gur AS, Unal B, Ozbek U, et al (2010). Validation of breast cancer nomograms for predicting the nonsentinel lymph node metastases after a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in a multi-center study. Eur J Surg Oncol, 36, 30-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
38 Alran S, De Rycke Y, Fourchotte V, et al (2007). Validation and limitations of use of a breast cancer nomogram predicting the likelihood of nonsentinel node involvement after positive sentinel node biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol, 14, 2195-201.   DOI
39 Chagpar AB, Scoggins CR, Martin RC, et al (2006). Prediction of sentinel lymph node-only disease in women with invasive breast cancer; University of Louisville Breast Sentinel Lymph Node Study. Am J Surg, 192, 882-7.   DOI
40 Chen K, Zhu L, Jia W, et al (2012). Validation and comparison of models to predict non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients. Cancer Sci, 103, 274-81.   DOI