Long-term Outcomes of a Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in a High Incidence Country |
Sangkarat, Suthi
(Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University)
Ruengkhachorn, Irene (Gynecologic Oncology Division, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University) Benjapibal, Mongkol (Gynecologic Oncology Division, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University) Laiwejpithaya, Somsak (Gynecologic Cytology Unit, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University) Wongthiraporn, Weerasak (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University) Rattanachaiyanont, Manee (Gynecologic Endocrinology Unit, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University) |
1 | Giacalone PL, Laffargue F, Aligier N, et al (1999). Randomized study comparing two techniques of conization: cold knife versus loop excision. Gynecol Oncol, 75, 356-60. DOI ScienceOn |
2 | Kietpeerakool C, Khunamornpong S, Srisomboon J, et al (2007). Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II-III with endocervical cone margin involvement after cervical loop conization: is there any predictor for residual disease? J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 33, 660-4. DOI ScienceOn |
3 | Kir G, Karabulut MH, Topal CS, et al (2012).Endocervical glandular involvement, positive endocervical surgical margin and multicentricity are more often associated with high-grade than low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 38, 1206-10. DOI ScienceOn |
4 | Luesley D, Leeson S (2004). Guidelines for the NHS Cervical Screening Programme. 1st ed. Sheffield, UK: NHSCSP2004. |
5 | Mathevet P, Chemali E, Roy M, et al (2003). Long-term outcome of a randomized study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 106, 214-8. DOI ScienceOn |
6 | Mathevet P, Dargent D, Roy M, et al (1994). A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP. Gynecol Oncol, 54, 175-9. DOI ScienceOn |
7 | Pecorelli S (2009). Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 105, 103-4. DOI ScienceOn |
8 | Prendiville W, Cullimore J, Norman S (1989). Large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ).A new method of management for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 96, 1054-60. DOI ScienceOn |
9 | Acharya G, Kjeldberg I, Hansen SM, et al (2005). Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure for the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 272, 109-12. DOI ScienceOn |
10 | Alvarez RD, Helm CW, Edwards RP, et al (1994). Prospective randomized trial of LLETZ versus laser ablation in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol, 52, 175-9. DOI ScienceOn |
11 | Ayhan A, Boynukalin FK, Guven S, et al (2009). Repeat LEEP conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and positive ectocervicalmargins. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 105, 14-7. DOI ScienceOn |
12 | Bevis KS, Biggio JR (2011). Cervical conization and the risk of preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 205, 19-27. DOI ScienceOn |
13 | Dey P, Gibbs A, Arnold DF, et al (2002). Loop diathermy excision compared with cervical laservaporisation for the treatment of intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG, 109, 381-5. DOI |
14 | Wright TC Jr, Massad LS, Dunton CJ, et al (2007).2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical screening tests. J Low Genit Tract Dis, 11, 201-22. DOI |
15 | Wright TC Jr, Massad LS, Dunton CJ, et al (2007).2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or adenocarcinoma in situ. J Low Genit Tract Dis, 11, 223-39. DOI ScienceOn |
16 | Reich O, Pickel H, Lahousen M, et al (2001). Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III: long-term outcome after coldknife conization with clear margins. Obstet Gynecol, 97, 428-30. DOI ScienceOn |
17 | Sadler L, Saftlas A, Wang W, et al (2004). Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery. JAMA, 291, 2100-6. DOI ScienceOn |
18 | Wright TC Jr, Richart RM, Ferenczy A, et al (1992). Comparison of specimens removed by CO2 laser conization and the loop electrosurgical excision procedure. Obstet Gynecol, 79, 147-53. |
19 | Shin JW, Rho HS, Park CY (2009). Factors influencing the choice between cold knife conization and loop electrosurgical excisional procedure for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 35, 126-30. DOI ScienceOn |
20 | Sjoborg KD, Vistad I, Myhr SS, et al (2007). Pregnancy outcome after cervical cone excision: a case-control study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 86, 423-8. DOI ScienceOn |
21 | Lodi CT, Michelin MA, Lima MI, et al (2011). Factors associated with recurrence of cervical intraepithelialneoplasia after conization in HIV-infected and noninfected women. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 284, 191-7. DOI |