Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.21.9101

Comparison of Automated Breast Volume Scanning and Hand-Held Ultrasound in the Detection of Breast Cancer: an Analysis of 5,566 Patient Evaluations  

Choi, Woo Jung (Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan)
Cha, Joo Hee (Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan)
Kim, Hak Hee (Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan)
Shin, Hee Jung (Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan)
Kim, Hyunji (Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan)
Chae, Eun Young (Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan)
Hong, Min Ji (Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan)
Publication Information
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention / v.15, no.21, 2014 , pp. 9101-9105 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy and effectiveness of automated breast volume scanning (ABVS) and hand-held ultrasound (HHUS) in the detection of breast cancer in a large population group with a long-term follow-up, and to investigate whether different ultrasound systems may influence the estimation of cancer detection. Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained for this retrospective study, and informed consent was waived. From September 2010 to August 2011, a total of 1,866 ABVS and 3,700 HHUS participants, who underwent these procedures at our institute, were included in this study. Cancers occurring during the study and subsequent follow-up were evaluated. The reference standard was a combination of histology and follow-up imaging (${\geq}12months$). The recall rate, cancer detection yield, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values were calculated with exact 95% confidence intervals. Results: The recall rate was 2.57 per 1,000 (48/1,866) for ABVS and 3.57 per 1,000 (132/3,700) for HHUS, with a significant difference (p=0.048). The cancer detection yield was 3.8 per 1,000 for ABVS and 2.7 per 1,000 for HHUS. The diagnostic accuracy was 97.7% for ABVS and 96.5% for HHUS with statistical significance (p=0.018). The specificity of ABVS and HHUS were 97.8%, 96.7%, respectively (p=0.022). Conclusions: ABVS shows a comparable diagnostic performance to HHUS. ABVS is an effective supplemental tool for mammography in breast cancer detection in a large population.
Keywords
Breast cancer; automated breast volume scanning; ultrasound; screening;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 6  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Berg WA, Zhang Z, Lehrer D, et al (2012). Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA, 307, 1394-404.   DOI
2 Boonlikit S (2013). Comparison of mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography alone for breast cancer screening in asymptomatic women. APJCP, 14, 7731-6.   과학기술학회마을   DOI
3 Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al (2007). Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med, 356, 227-36.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Chang JM, Moon WK, Cho N, Park JS, Kim SJ (2011). Radiologists' performance in the detection of benign and malignant masses with 3D automated breast ultrasound (ABUS). Europ J Radiol, 78, 99-103.   DOI
5 Cho N, Moon WK, Cha JH, et al (2006). Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses: comparison of twodimensional and three-dimensional US. Radiology, 240, 26-32.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Chou Y-H, Tiu C-M, Chen J, Chang R-F (2007). Automated full-field breast ultrasonography: the past and the present. J Med Ultrasound, 15, 31-44.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 D'Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, Berg WA (2003). Mammography. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). 4th ed. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology.
8 Jung KW, Park S, Won YJ, et al (2012). Prediction of cancer incidence and mortality in Korea, 2012. Cancer Res Treat, 44, 25-31.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Kang MH, Park EC, Choi KS, et al (2013). The national cancer screening program for breast cancer in the republic of Korea: is it cost-effective? Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 2059-65.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Kelly KM, Dean J, Comulada WS, Lee SJ (2010a). Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts. Eur Radiology, 20, 734-42.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Kelly KM, Dean J, Lee SJ, Comulada WS (2010b). Breast cancer detection: radiologists' performance using mammography with and without automated whole-breast ultrasound. Eur Radiology, 20, 2557-64.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Kim Y, Jun JK, Choi KS, Lee HY, Park EC (2011). Overview of the National Cancer screening programme and the cancer screening status in Korea. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 12, 725-30.
13 Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH (2002). Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology, 225, 165-75.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Kotsianos-Hermle D, Hiltawsky KM, Wirth S, et al (2009). Analysis of 107 breast lesions with automated 3D ultrasound and comparison with mammography and manual ultrasound. Eur J Radiol, 71, 109-15.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Lin X, Wang J, Han F, Fu J, Li A (2012). Analysis of eighty-one cases with breast lesions using automated breast volume scanner and comparison with handheld ultrasound. Eur J Radiol, 81, 873-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Mendelson EB, Baum JK, Berg WA, Merritt CR, Rubin E (2003). Ultrasound. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BIRADS). 4th ed. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology.
17 Wang FL, Chen F, Yin H, et al (2013). Effects of age, breast density and volume on breast cancer diagnosis: a retrospective comparison of sensitivity of mammography and ultrasonography in China's rural areas. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 2277-82.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Shin HJ, Kim HH, Cha JH, et al (2011). Automated ultrasound of the breast for diagnosis: interobserver agreement on lesion detection and characterization. Am J Radiol, 197, 747-54.
19 Suh M, Choi KS, Lee YY, Park B, Jun JK (2013). Cancer screening in Korea, 2012: results from the Korean national Cancer Screening Survey. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 6459-63.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Tozaki M, Fukuma E (2010). Accuracy of determining preoperative cancer extent measured by automated breast ultrasonography. Jpn J Radiol, 28, 771-3.   DOI
21 Wang ZL, Xu JH, Li JL, Huang Y, Tang J (2012). Comparison of automated breast volume scanning to hand-held ultrasound and mammography. Radiol Med, 117, 1287-93.   DOI
22 Weaver DL, Rosenberg RD, Barlow WE, et al (2006). Pathologic findings from the breast cancer surveillance consortium: population-based outcomes in women undergoing biopsy after screening mammography. Cancer, 106, 732-42.   DOI
23 Yoo KB, Kwon JA, Cho E, et al (2013). Is mammography for breast cancer screening cost-effective in both Western and asian countries?: results of a systematic review. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 4141-9.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Berg WA (2009). Tailored supplemental screening for breast cancer: what now and what next? Am J Radiol, 192, 390-9.
25 Akbari ME, Haghighatkhah H, Shafiee M, et al (2012). Mammography and ultrasonography reports compared with tissue diagnosis-an evidence based study in Iran, 2010. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 13, 1907-10.   과학기술학회마을   DOI
26 Benson SR, Blue J, Judd K, Harman JE (2004). Ultrasound is now better than mammography for the detection of invasive breast cancer. Am J Surg, 188, 381-5.   DOI
27 Berg WA (2007). Beyond standard mammographic screening: mammography at age extremes, ultrasound, and MR imaging. Radiol Clin North Am, 45, 895-906.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, et al (2008). Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA, 299, 2151-63.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, et al (2004). Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology, 233, 830-49.   DOI   ScienceOn