Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.18.7757

Long Term Outcomes of Laser Conization for High Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Thai Women  

Wongtiraporn, Weerasak (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University)
Laiwejpithaya, Somsak (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University)
Sangkarat, Suthi (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University)
Benjapibal, Mongkol (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University)
Rattanachaiyanont, Manee (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University)
Ruengkhachorn, Irene (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University)
Chaopotong, Pattama (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University)
Laiwejpithaya, Sujera (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University)
Publication Information
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention / v.15, no.18, 2014 , pp. 7757-7761 More about this Journal
Abstract
Aim: To report long term outcomes of laser conization for high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in Thai women. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in patients undergoing laser conization due to abnormal cervical cytology suggesting neoplasia during 1989 to 1994 and having follow-up data until December 2010. Conization was performed under colposcopy using a 0.5-mm $CO_2$ laser beam with power density of $18,000-20,000watts/cm^2$, and the surgical base was vaporized using a low power defocused beam. The follow-up protocol included cervical cytology and colposcopy. Long term outcome measures were failure rate (persistence and recurrence), post-conization status of transformation zone, and obstetric outcomes. Results: Of 104 patients undergoing conization, 71 had therapeutic conization for high grade CIN and were followed up for a median time of 115 (range 12-260) months. There was one case of persistent and one of recurrent disease comprising a failure rate of 2.8%. The post treatment transformation zone was well visualized in 68.3% of 63 patients with an intact uterus. Sixteen patients achieved 25 pregnancies; none had second trimester miscarriage. The obstetric outcomes were unremarkable. Conclusions: Laser conization under colposcopic visualization for the treatment of high grade CIN in Thai women has a low failure rate of 2.8%. The post-conization transformation zone could not be evaluated completely in approximately 30% of cases; therefore the follow-up protocol should include both cytology and colposcopy. Obstetric outcomes are not adversely affected by this therapeutic procedure.
Keywords
Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; laser conization; long term outcomes; Thailand;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Bar-Am A, Daniel Y, Ron IG, et al (2000). Combined colposcopy, loop conization and laser vaporization reduces recurrent abnormal cytology and residual disease in cervical dysplasia. Gynecol Oncol, 78, 47-51.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Baser E, Ozgu E, Erkilinc S, et al (2013). Clinical outcomes of cases with cervical dysplasia absent in cold knife conization specimens. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev, 14, 6693-6..   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Forsmo S, Hansen MH, Jacobsen BK, Qian P (1996). Pregnancy outcome after laser surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 75, 139-43.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Bekassy Z (1997). Long-term follow-up of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia treated with minimal conization by carbondioxide laser. Lasers Surg Med, 20, 461-6.   DOI
5 Dorsey JH, Diggs ES (1979). Microsurgical conization of the cervix by carbondioxide laser. Obstet Gynecol, 54, 565-70.
6 Duggan BD, Felix JC, Muderspach LI, et al (1999). Cold-knife conization versus conization by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a randomized prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 180, 276-82.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Laiwejpithaya S, Rattanachaiyanont M, Benjapibal M, et al (2008). Comparison between Siriraj liquid-based and conventional cytology for detection of abnormal cervicovaginal smears: a split sample study. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev, 9, 575-80.
8 Lu CH, Liu FS, Kuo CJ, et al (2006). Prediction of persistence or recurrence after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III. Obstet Gynecol, 107, 830-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Miller NF, Todd OE (1938). Conization of the cervix. Surg Gyncol Obstet, 67, 265-70.
10 Mitchell MF, Schottenfeld D, Tortolero-Luna G, et al (1998). Colposcopy for the diagnosis of squamous intraepithelial lesion: a meta analysis. Obstet Gynecol, 91, 626-31.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Raio L, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E, et al (1997). Duration of pregnancy after carbon dioxide laser conization of the cervix: influence of cone height. Obstet Gynecol, 90, 978-82.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Sadler L, Saftlas A, Wang W, et al (2004). Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery. JAMA, 291, 2100-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Moss EL, Dhar KK, Byrom J, Jones PW, Redman CW (2009). The diagnostic accuracy of colposcopy in previously treated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Low Genit Tract Dis, 13, 5-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Oyesanya OA, Amerazinghe C, Manning EA (1993). A comparison between loop diathermy conization and coldknife conization for management of cervical dysplasia associated with unsatisfactory colposcopy. Gyneol Oncol, 50, 84-8.
15 Paraskevaidis E, Lolis ED, Koliopoulos G, et al (2000). Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia outcomes after large loop excision with clear margins. Obstet Gynecol, 95, 828-31.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Sagot P, Caroit Y, Winer et al (1995). Obstetrical prognosis for carbon dioxide laser conisation of the uterine cervix. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 58, 53-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Sjoborg KD, Vistad I, Myhr SS, et al (2007). Pregnancy outcome after cervical cone excision: a case control study. Acta obstet Gynecol, 86, 423-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Skjeldestad FE, Hagen B, Lie AK, Isaksen C (1997). Residual and recurrent disease after laser conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol, 90, 428-33.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Ueki M, Okamoto Y, Misaki O, et al (1994). Conservative therapy for microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol, 53, 109-13.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Wuntakal R, Castanon A, Sasieni PD, Hollingworth A (2013). Pregnancy outcomes after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a Single NHS Hospital. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 23, 710-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Ueda M, Ueki K, Kanemura M, et al (2006). Diagnostic and therapeutic laser conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol, 101, 143-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Khuhaprema T, Attasara P, Sriplung H, et al (2012). Cancer in Thailand. Vol. VI, 2004-2006. Bangkok, National Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Service, Ministry of Public Health.
23 Mathevet P, Dargent D, Roy M, Beau G (1994). A randomized study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife cone, laser and LEEP. Gynecol Oncol, 54, 175-9.   DOI   ScienceOn