Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.15.6411

Analysis of Mammographic Breast Density in a Group of Screening Chinese Women and Breast Cancer Patients  

Liu, Jing (Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Tianjin Medical University)
Liu, Pei-Fang (Department of Breast Imaging, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Ministry of Education, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital)
Li, Jun-Nan (Department of Breast Imaging, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Ministry of Education, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital)
Qing, Chun (Department of Breast Imaging, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Ministry of Education, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital)
Ji, Yu (Department of Breast Imaging, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Ministry of Education, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital)
Hao, Xi-Shan (Chinese Anti-Cancer Association (CACA))
Zhang, Xue-Ning (Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Tianjin Medical University)
Publication Information
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention / v.15, no.15, 2014 , pp. 6411-6414 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: A dense breast not only reduces the sensitivity of mammography but also is a moderate independent risk factor for breast cancer. The percentage of Western women with fat breast tissue is higher aged 40 years or older. To a certain extent, mammography as a first choice of screening imaging method for Western women of this group is reasonable. Hitherto, the frequency and age distribution of mammographic breast density patterns among Chinese women had not been characterized. The purpose of this study was to investigate the frequency and age distribution of mammographic breast density patterns among a group of Chinese screening women and breast cancer patients in order to provide useful information for age-specific guidelines for breast cancer screening in Chinese women. Methods: A retrospective review of a total of 3,394 screening women between August and December 2009 and 2,527 breast cancer patients between July 2011 and June 2012 was conducted. Descriptive analyses were used to examine the association between age and breast density. The significance of differences of breast density between the screening women and the breast cancer patients was examined using nonparametric tests. Results: There was a significant inverse relationship between age and breast density overall (r=-0.37, p< 0.01). Breast density of the breast cancer patients in the subgroups of 40-49 years old was greater compared with that of the screening women, the same in those aged 50-54 years and in those 55 years old or older, less than in the screening group. Conclusions: With regard to the Chinese women younger than 55 years old, the diagnostic efficiency of breast cancer screening imaging examinations may be potentially improved by combining screening mammography with ultrasound.
Keywords
Breast cancer; breast density; Chinese women; age dependence; screening;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA, et al (1995). Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst, 87, 670-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, et al (2003). Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med, 138, 168-75.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Colin C, Prince V, Valette PJ (2013). Can mammographic assessments lead to consider density as a risk factor for breast cancer? Eur J Radiol, 82, 404-11.   DOI
4 Del Carmen MG, Halpern EF, Kopans DB, et al (2007). Mammographic breast density and race. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 188, 1147-50.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 D' Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, Berg WA, et al (2003). Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, BI-RADS: Mammography. 4th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology.
6 Fan L, Zheng Y, Yu KD, et al (2009). Breast cancer in a transitional society over 18 years: trends and present status in Shanghai, China. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 117, 409-16.   DOI
7 Han JG, Jiang YD, Zhang CH, et al (2011). Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of young patients with breast cancer. Breast, 20, 370-2.   DOI
8 Hollenbeck S, Keely P, Seewaldt V (2013). Mammographic density: intersection of science, the law, and clinical practice. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book.
9 Kruk J (2014). Association between vegetable, fruit and carbohydrate intake and breast cancer risk in relation to physical activity. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 15, 4429-36.   과학기술학회마을   DOI
10 Lehman CD, White E, Peacock S, et al (1999). Effect of age and breast density on screening mammograms with false-positive findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 173, 1651-5.   DOI
11 Li J, Zhang BN, Fan JH, et al (2011). A nation-wide multicenter 10-year (1999-2008) retrospective clinical epidemiological study of female breast cancer in China. BMC Cancer, 11, 364.   DOI
12 Lin CH, Liau JY, Lu YS, et al (2009). Molecular subtypes of breast cancer emerging in young women in Taiwan: evidence for more than just westernization as a reason for the disease in Asia. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 18, 1807-14.   DOI
13 Lu C, Schneider MT, Gubbins P, et al (2010). Public financing of health in developing countries: a cross-national systematic analysis. Lancet, 375, 1375-87.   DOI
14 McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I (2006). Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a metaanalysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 15, 1159-69.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Stomper PC, D'Souza DJ, DiNitto PA, et al (1966). Analysis of parenchymal density on mammograms in 1353 women 25-79 years old. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 167, 1261-5.
16 Nie K, Su MY, Chau MK, et al (2010). Age- and race- dependence of the fibroglandular breast density analyzed on 3D MRI. Med Phys, 37, 2770-6.   DOI
17 Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Panizza P, et al (2004). Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 183, 1149-57.   DOI
18 Smith RA, Manassaram-Baptiste D, Brooks D, et al (2014). Cancer Screening in the United States, 2014 A Review of Current American Cancer Society Guidelines and Current Issues in Cancer Screening. CA Cancer J Clin, 64, 30-51.   DOI
19 Wang FL, Chen F, Yin H, et al (2013). Effects of Age, Breast Density and Volume on Breast Cancer Diagnosis: A retrospective comparison of sensitivity of mammography and ultrasonography in China's rural areas. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 2277-82.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Yang L, Parkin DM, Ferlay J, et al (2005). Estimates of cancer incidence in China for 2000 and projections for 2005. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 14, 243-50.
21 Yang L, Li LD, Chen YD, et al (2006). Time trends, estimates and projects for breast cancer incidence and mortality in China. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi, 28, 438-40.
22 Zhang ML, Huang ZZ, Zheng Y (2012). Estimates and prediction on incidence, mortality and prevalence of breast cancer in China, 2008. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi, 33, 1049-51.
23 Asif HM, Sultana S, Akhtar N, et al (2014). Prevalence, risk factors and disease knowledge of breast cancer in Pakistan. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 15, 4411-6.   과학기술학회마을   DOI
24 Zulfiqar MA, Rohazly I, Rahmah MA (2011). Do the majority of Malaysian women have dense breasts on mammogram? Biomed Imaging Interv J, 7, 14.